Habitat monitoring in the wider countryside

a case study on the pursuit of innovation in red deer management

Georgina Maffey, Mark Reed, R. Justin Irvine, Rene Van Der Wal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Policy frameworks for protected areas, such as the EU habitats directive, ensure that environmental monitoring takes place to assess the condition of these sites. However, this monitoring rarely extends to the wider countryside, and there is no obligation for private landowners to detect trends in habitat condition. Using the diffusion of innovations model as an analytical framework we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews to consider the uptake of habitat impact assessment methods throughout a community involved in private land use pursuits in Scotland. It was found that although the community as a whole recognises the benefits of habitat impact assessments there are a number of barriers to their uptake, including the complexity of data gathering and interpretation, and uncertainty around who should be responsible for the conduct of assessments. Analysing the uptake of an innovation at an early stage, rather than retrospectively as is commonly done, highlights the potential for non-adoption and could therefore inform the reinvention of the innovation. In this instance reinvention could lead to more appropriate monitoring methods, which, if taken up, could reduce the need for legislative intervention in situations where both public and private interests need to be considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)779-786
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume128
Early online date13 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

deer
innovation
Innovation
Monitoring
habitat
monitoring
Land use
private land
analytical framework
assessment method
landowner
environmental monitoring
protected area
land use
impact assessment
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • diffusion of innovations
  • red deer management
  • private land
  • habitat monitoring
  • wildlife management

Cite this

Habitat monitoring in the wider countryside : a case study on the pursuit of innovation in red deer management. / Maffey, Georgina; Reed, Mark; Irvine, R. Justin; Van Der Wal, Rene.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 128, 15.10.2013, p. 779-786.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{478fdfdf55a7479981ffa7bc497ef3fd,
title = "Habitat monitoring in the wider countryside: a case study on the pursuit of innovation in red deer management",
abstract = "Policy frameworks for protected areas, such as the EU habitats directive, ensure that environmental monitoring takes place to assess the condition of these sites. However, this monitoring rarely extends to the wider countryside, and there is no obligation for private landowners to detect trends in habitat condition. Using the diffusion of innovations model as an analytical framework we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews to consider the uptake of habitat impact assessment methods throughout a community involved in private land use pursuits in Scotland. It was found that although the community as a whole recognises the benefits of habitat impact assessments there are a number of barriers to their uptake, including the complexity of data gathering and interpretation, and uncertainty around who should be responsible for the conduct of assessments. Analysing the uptake of an innovation at an early stage, rather than retrospectively as is commonly done, highlights the potential for non-adoption and could therefore inform the reinvention of the innovation. In this instance reinvention could lead to more appropriate monitoring methods, which, if taken up, could reduce the need for legislative intervention in situations where both public and private interests need to be considered.",
keywords = "diffusion of innovations, red deer management, private land, habitat monitoring, wildlife management",
author = "Georgina Maffey and Mark Reed and Irvine, {R. Justin} and {Van Der Wal}, Rene",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.022",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
pages = "779--786",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habitat monitoring in the wider countryside

T2 - a case study on the pursuit of innovation in red deer management

AU - Maffey, Georgina

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Irvine, R. Justin

AU - Van Der Wal, Rene

PY - 2013/10/15

Y1 - 2013/10/15

N2 - Policy frameworks for protected areas, such as the EU habitats directive, ensure that environmental monitoring takes place to assess the condition of these sites. However, this monitoring rarely extends to the wider countryside, and there is no obligation for private landowners to detect trends in habitat condition. Using the diffusion of innovations model as an analytical framework we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews to consider the uptake of habitat impact assessment methods throughout a community involved in private land use pursuits in Scotland. It was found that although the community as a whole recognises the benefits of habitat impact assessments there are a number of barriers to their uptake, including the complexity of data gathering and interpretation, and uncertainty around who should be responsible for the conduct of assessments. Analysing the uptake of an innovation at an early stage, rather than retrospectively as is commonly done, highlights the potential for non-adoption and could therefore inform the reinvention of the innovation. In this instance reinvention could lead to more appropriate monitoring methods, which, if taken up, could reduce the need for legislative intervention in situations where both public and private interests need to be considered.

AB - Policy frameworks for protected areas, such as the EU habitats directive, ensure that environmental monitoring takes place to assess the condition of these sites. However, this monitoring rarely extends to the wider countryside, and there is no obligation for private landowners to detect trends in habitat condition. Using the diffusion of innovations model as an analytical framework we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews to consider the uptake of habitat impact assessment methods throughout a community involved in private land use pursuits in Scotland. It was found that although the community as a whole recognises the benefits of habitat impact assessments there are a number of barriers to their uptake, including the complexity of data gathering and interpretation, and uncertainty around who should be responsible for the conduct of assessments. Analysing the uptake of an innovation at an early stage, rather than retrospectively as is commonly done, highlights the potential for non-adoption and could therefore inform the reinvention of the innovation. In this instance reinvention could lead to more appropriate monitoring methods, which, if taken up, could reduce the need for legislative intervention in situations where both public and private interests need to be considered.

KW - diffusion of innovations

KW - red deer management

KW - private land

KW - habitat monitoring

KW - wildlife management

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.022

M3 - Article

VL - 128

SP - 779

EP - 786

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -