Harbour porpoise responses to pile-driving diminish over time

Isla M Graham (Corresponding Author), Nathan D. Merchant, Adrian Farcas, Tim R Candido Barton, Barbara Cheney, Saliza Bono, Paul M Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Estimating impacts of offshore windfarm construction on marine mammals requires data on displacement in relation to different noise levels and sources. Using echolocation detectors and noise recorders, we investigated harbour porpoise behavioural responses to piling noise during the 10-month foundation installation of a North Sea windfarm. Current UK guidance assumes total displacement within 26 km of pile driving. In contrast, we recorded a 50 % probability of response within 7.4 km (95 % CI = 5.7 – 9.4) at the first location piled, decreasing to 1.3 km (95 % CI = 0.2 – 2.8) by the final location; representing 28 % (95 % CI = 21 – 35) and 18 % (95 % CI = 13 – 23) displacement of individuals within 26 km. Distance proved as good a predictor of responses as audiogram weighted received levels, presenting a more practicable variable for environmental assessments. Critically, acoustic deterrent device (ADD) use and vessel activity increased response levels. Policy and management to minimise impacts of renewables on cetaceans have concentrated on pile-driving noise. Our results highlight the need to consider trade-offs between efforts to reduce far-field behavioural disturbance and near-field injury through ADD use.
Original languageEnglish
Article number190335
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Volume6
Issue number6
Early online date26 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

pile driving
porpoise
harbor
acoustics
echolocation
cetacean
marine mammal
behavioral response
environmental assessment
vessel
disturbance
deterrent

Keywords

  • acoustic disturbance
  • anthropogenic noise
  • behavioural response
  • environmental risk assessment
  • marine mammal conservation
  • Environmental risk assessment
  • Marine mammal conservation
  • Behavioural response
  • Acoustic disturbance
  • Anthropogenic noise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Harbour porpoise responses to pile-driving diminish over time. / Graham, Isla M (Corresponding Author); Merchant, Nathan D.; Farcas, Adrian; Candido Barton, Tim R; Cheney, Barbara; Bono, Saliza ; Thompson, Paul M.

In: Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 6, No. 6, 190335, 06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Graham, Isla M ; Merchant, Nathan D. ; Farcas, Adrian ; Candido Barton, Tim R ; Cheney, Barbara ; Bono, Saliza ; Thompson, Paul M. / Harbour porpoise responses to pile-driving diminish over time. In: Royal Society Open Science. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 6.
@article{64ef483d836943f1960c333851d1a108,
title = "Harbour porpoise responses to pile-driving diminish over time",
abstract = "Estimating impacts of offshore windfarm construction on marine mammals requires data on displacement in relation to different noise levels and sources. Using echolocation detectors and noise recorders, we investigated harbour porpoise behavioural responses to piling noise during the 10-month foundation installation of a North Sea windfarm. Current UK guidance assumes total displacement within 26 km of pile driving. In contrast, we recorded a 50 {\%} probability of response within 7.4 km (95 {\%} CI = 5.7 – 9.4) at the first location piled, decreasing to 1.3 km (95 {\%} CI = 0.2 – 2.8) by the final location; representing 28 {\%} (95 {\%} CI = 21 – 35) and 18 {\%} (95 {\%} CI = 13 – 23) displacement of individuals within 26 km. Distance proved as good a predictor of responses as audiogram weighted received levels, presenting a more practicable variable for environmental assessments. Critically, acoustic deterrent device (ADD) use and vessel activity increased response levels. Policy and management to minimise impacts of renewables on cetaceans have concentrated on pile-driving noise. Our results highlight the need to consider trade-offs between efforts to reduce far-field behavioural disturbance and near-field injury through ADD use.",
keywords = "acoustic disturbance, anthropogenic noise, behavioural response, environmental risk assessment, marine mammal conservation, Environmental risk assessment, Marine mammal conservation, Behavioural response, Acoustic disturbance, Anthropogenic noise",
author = "Graham, {Isla M} and Merchant, {Nathan D.} and Adrian Farcas and {Candido Barton}, {Tim R} and Barbara Cheney and Saliza Bono and Thompson, {Paul M}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1098/rsos.190335",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
journal = "Royal Society Open Science",
issn = "2054-5703",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harbour porpoise responses to pile-driving diminish over time

AU - Graham, Isla M

AU - Merchant, Nathan D.

AU - Farcas, Adrian

AU - Candido Barton, Tim R

AU - Cheney, Barbara

AU - Bono, Saliza

AU - Thompson, Paul M

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Estimating impacts of offshore windfarm construction on marine mammals requires data on displacement in relation to different noise levels and sources. Using echolocation detectors and noise recorders, we investigated harbour porpoise behavioural responses to piling noise during the 10-month foundation installation of a North Sea windfarm. Current UK guidance assumes total displacement within 26 km of pile driving. In contrast, we recorded a 50 % probability of response within 7.4 km (95 % CI = 5.7 – 9.4) at the first location piled, decreasing to 1.3 km (95 % CI = 0.2 – 2.8) by the final location; representing 28 % (95 % CI = 21 – 35) and 18 % (95 % CI = 13 – 23) displacement of individuals within 26 km. Distance proved as good a predictor of responses as audiogram weighted received levels, presenting a more practicable variable for environmental assessments. Critically, acoustic deterrent device (ADD) use and vessel activity increased response levels. Policy and management to minimise impacts of renewables on cetaceans have concentrated on pile-driving noise. Our results highlight the need to consider trade-offs between efforts to reduce far-field behavioural disturbance and near-field injury through ADD use.

AB - Estimating impacts of offshore windfarm construction on marine mammals requires data on displacement in relation to different noise levels and sources. Using echolocation detectors and noise recorders, we investigated harbour porpoise behavioural responses to piling noise during the 10-month foundation installation of a North Sea windfarm. Current UK guidance assumes total displacement within 26 km of pile driving. In contrast, we recorded a 50 % probability of response within 7.4 km (95 % CI = 5.7 – 9.4) at the first location piled, decreasing to 1.3 km (95 % CI = 0.2 – 2.8) by the final location; representing 28 % (95 % CI = 21 – 35) and 18 % (95 % CI = 13 – 23) displacement of individuals within 26 km. Distance proved as good a predictor of responses as audiogram weighted received levels, presenting a more practicable variable for environmental assessments. Critically, acoustic deterrent device (ADD) use and vessel activity increased response levels. Policy and management to minimise impacts of renewables on cetaceans have concentrated on pile-driving noise. Our results highlight the need to consider trade-offs between efforts to reduce far-field behavioural disturbance and near-field injury through ADD use.

KW - acoustic disturbance

KW - anthropogenic noise

KW - behavioural response

KW - environmental risk assessment

KW - marine mammal conservation

KW - Environmental risk assessment

KW - Marine mammal conservation

KW - Behavioural response

KW - Acoustic disturbance

KW - Anthropogenic noise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068229510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.190335

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/harbour-porpoise-responses-piledriving-diminish-time-1

U2 - 10.1098/rsos.190335

DO - 10.1098/rsos.190335

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Royal Society Open Science

JF - Royal Society Open Science

SN - 2054-5703

IS - 6

M1 - 190335

ER -