Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments

Tom C. Cameron, Daniel O'Sullivan, Alan Reynolds, Joseph P. Hicks, Stuart B. Piertney, Tim G. Benton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitation or environmental variation has the greatest influence on the stability of population dynamics, with consequences for variation in yield and extinction risk. Theoretical studies however have shown that harvesting can increase or decrease population variability depending on environmental variation, and requested controlled empirical studies to test predictions. Here, we use an invertebrate model species in experimental microcosms to explore the interaction between selective harvesting and environmental variation in food availability in affecting the variability of stage-structured animal populations over 20 generations. In a constant food environment, harvesting adults had negligible impact on population variability or population size, but in the variable food environments, harvesting adults increased population variability and reduced its size. The impact of harvesting on population variability differed between proportional and threshold harvesting, between randomly and periodically varying environments, and at different points of the time series. Our study suggests that predicting the responses to selective harvesting is sensitive to the demographic structures and processes that emerge in environments with different patterns of environmental variation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4179-4191
Number of pages13
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume6
Issue number12
Early online date24 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Fingerprint

population dynamics
extinction risk
food
theoretical study
food availability
microcosm
population size
invertebrate
time series
time series analysis
animals
extinction
demographic statistics
climate
invertebrates
climate change
prediction
animal population
testing
test

Keywords

  • Age-truncation
  • Density dependence
  • Environment
  • Harvesting
  • Microcosm
  • Mortality
  • Population dynamics
  • Predation
  • Seasonality
  • Stage-structure
  • Threshold
  • Variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Cameron, T. C., O'Sullivan, D., Reynolds, A., Hicks, J. P., Piertney, S. B., & Benton, T. G. (2016). Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments. Ecology and Evolution, 6(12), 4179-4191. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164

Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments. / Cameron, Tom C.; O'Sullivan, Daniel; Reynolds, Alan; Hicks, Joseph P.; Piertney, Stuart B.; Benton, Tim G.

In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 6, No. 12, 06.2016, p. 4179-4191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cameron, TC, O'Sullivan, D, Reynolds, A, Hicks, JP, Piertney, SB & Benton, TG 2016, 'Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments' Ecology and Evolution, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4179-4191. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164
Cameron, Tom C. ; O'Sullivan, Daniel ; Reynolds, Alan ; Hicks, Joseph P. ; Piertney, Stuart B. ; Benton, Tim G. / Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments. In: Ecology and Evolution. 2016 ; Vol. 6, No. 12. pp. 4179-4191.
@article{db1b4f3e8a0f4a7f9dc24fc7e4849fed,
title = "Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments",
abstract = "The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitation or environmental variation has the greatest influence on the stability of population dynamics, with consequences for variation in yield and extinction risk. Theoretical studies however have shown that harvesting can increase or decrease population variability depending on environmental variation, and requested controlled empirical studies to test predictions. Here, we use an invertebrate model species in experimental microcosms to explore the interaction between selective harvesting and environmental variation in food availability in affecting the variability of stage-structured animal populations over 20 generations. In a constant food environment, harvesting adults had negligible impact on population variability or population size, but in the variable food environments, harvesting adults increased population variability and reduced its size. The impact of harvesting on population variability differed between proportional and threshold harvesting, between randomly and periodically varying environments, and at different points of the time series. Our study suggests that predicting the responses to selective harvesting is sensitive to the demographic structures and processes that emerge in environments with different patterns of environmental variation.",
keywords = "Age-truncation, Density dependence, Environment, Harvesting, Microcosm, Mortality, Population dynamics, Predation, Seasonality, Stage-structure, Threshold, Variability",
author = "Cameron, {Tom C.} and Daniel O'Sullivan and Alan Reynolds and Hicks, {Joseph P.} and Piertney, {Stuart B.} and Benton, {Tim G.}",
note = "Acknowledgments This work was funded by NERC grant NE/C510467/1 (T. G. Benton and S. B. Piertney) and a University of Leeds Faculty Postdoctoral Fellowship (T. C. Cameron). Data Accessibility The original time series and body size data from these experiments are available to download from DRYAD entry number http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bq135.",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1002/ece3.2164",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "4179--4191",
journal = "Ecology and Evolution",
issn = "2045-7758",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments

AU - Cameron, Tom C.

AU - O'Sullivan, Daniel

AU - Reynolds, Alan

AU - Hicks, Joseph P.

AU - Piertney, Stuart B.

AU - Benton, Tim G.

N1 - Acknowledgments This work was funded by NERC grant NE/C510467/1 (T. G. Benton and S. B. Piertney) and a University of Leeds Faculty Postdoctoral Fellowship (T. C. Cameron). Data Accessibility The original time series and body size data from these experiments are available to download from DRYAD entry number http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bq135.

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitation or environmental variation has the greatest influence on the stability of population dynamics, with consequences for variation in yield and extinction risk. Theoretical studies however have shown that harvesting can increase or decrease population variability depending on environmental variation, and requested controlled empirical studies to test predictions. Here, we use an invertebrate model species in experimental microcosms to explore the interaction between selective harvesting and environmental variation in food availability in affecting the variability of stage-structured animal populations over 20 generations. In a constant food environment, harvesting adults had negligible impact on population variability or population size, but in the variable food environments, harvesting adults increased population variability and reduced its size. The impact of harvesting on population variability differed between proportional and threshold harvesting, between randomly and periodically varying environments, and at different points of the time series. Our study suggests that predicting the responses to selective harvesting is sensitive to the demographic structures and processes that emerge in environments with different patterns of environmental variation.

AB - The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitation or environmental variation has the greatest influence on the stability of population dynamics, with consequences for variation in yield and extinction risk. Theoretical studies however have shown that harvesting can increase or decrease population variability depending on environmental variation, and requested controlled empirical studies to test predictions. Here, we use an invertebrate model species in experimental microcosms to explore the interaction between selective harvesting and environmental variation in food availability in affecting the variability of stage-structured animal populations over 20 generations. In a constant food environment, harvesting adults had negligible impact on population variability or population size, but in the variable food environments, harvesting adults increased population variability and reduced its size. The impact of harvesting on population variability differed between proportional and threshold harvesting, between randomly and periodically varying environments, and at different points of the time series. Our study suggests that predicting the responses to selective harvesting is sensitive to the demographic structures and processes that emerge in environments with different patterns of environmental variation.

KW - Age-truncation

KW - Density dependence

KW - Environment

KW - Harvesting

KW - Microcosm

KW - Mortality

KW - Population dynamics

KW - Predation

KW - Seasonality

KW - Stage-structure

KW - Threshold

KW - Variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971222246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ece3.2164

DO - 10.1002/ece3.2164

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 4179

EP - 4191

JO - Ecology and Evolution

JF - Ecology and Evolution

SN - 2045-7758

IS - 12

ER -