Historical Memory in Post-Cold War Europe

Csilla Kiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines European memory and memory politics. Taking as my starting point the deepening divisions between the “old” and “new” members of the European Union since the 2004 and 2007 enlargements, I investigate whether differences in official memory concerning World War II on the one hand and communism on the other should be regarded as permanent. Using examples from the development of West-European postwar memory-regimes and comparing them to the current state in postcommunist Europe I suggest that with respect to historical memory the two parts of Europe underwent similar developments, crises and debates, thus making eventual convergence and consensus possible. However, there are various factors that complicate progress in this area: postcommunist countries have to contend not only with their wartime history but also with the experience of communism, which latter colours the assessment of the former.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-432
Number of pages14
JournalThe European Legacy: Towards New Paradigms
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2014

Fingerprint

Cold War
Historical Memory
Communism
History
Wartime
Enlargement
European Union
Second World War

Cite this

Historical Memory in Post-Cold War Europe. / Kiss, Csilla.

In: The European Legacy: Towards New Paradigms, Vol. 19, No. 4, 22.05.2014, p. 419-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kiss, Csilla. / Historical Memory in Post-Cold War Europe. In: The European Legacy: Towards New Paradigms. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 419-432.
@article{6c397d50b2824d8f8a8a1548566e974d,
title = "Historical Memory in Post-Cold War Europe",
abstract = "This article examines European memory and memory politics. Taking as my starting point the deepening divisions between the “old” and “new” members of the European Union since the 2004 and 2007 enlargements, I investigate whether differences in official memory concerning World War II on the one hand and communism on the other should be regarded as permanent. Using examples from the development of West-European postwar memory-regimes and comparing them to the current state in postcommunist Europe I suggest that with respect to historical memory the two parts of Europe underwent similar developments, crises and debates, thus making eventual convergence and consensus possible. However, there are various factors that complicate progress in this area: postcommunist countries have to contend not only with their wartime history but also with the experience of communism, which latter colours the assessment of the former.",
author = "Csilla Kiss",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/10848770.2014.919189",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "419--432",
journal = "The European Legacy: Towards New Paradigms",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Historical Memory in Post-Cold War Europe

AU - Kiss, Csilla

PY - 2014/5/22

Y1 - 2014/5/22

N2 - This article examines European memory and memory politics. Taking as my starting point the deepening divisions between the “old” and “new” members of the European Union since the 2004 and 2007 enlargements, I investigate whether differences in official memory concerning World War II on the one hand and communism on the other should be regarded as permanent. Using examples from the development of West-European postwar memory-regimes and comparing them to the current state in postcommunist Europe I suggest that with respect to historical memory the two parts of Europe underwent similar developments, crises and debates, thus making eventual convergence and consensus possible. However, there are various factors that complicate progress in this area: postcommunist countries have to contend not only with their wartime history but also with the experience of communism, which latter colours the assessment of the former.

AB - This article examines European memory and memory politics. Taking as my starting point the deepening divisions between the “old” and “new” members of the European Union since the 2004 and 2007 enlargements, I investigate whether differences in official memory concerning World War II on the one hand and communism on the other should be regarded as permanent. Using examples from the development of West-European postwar memory-regimes and comparing them to the current state in postcommunist Europe I suggest that with respect to historical memory the two parts of Europe underwent similar developments, crises and debates, thus making eventual convergence and consensus possible. However, there are various factors that complicate progress in this area: postcommunist countries have to contend not only with their wartime history but also with the experience of communism, which latter colours the assessment of the former.

U2 - 10.1080/10848770.2014.919189

DO - 10.1080/10848770.2014.919189

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 419

EP - 432

JO - The European Legacy: Towards New Paradigms

JF - The European Legacy: Towards New Paradigms

IS - 4

ER -