Abstract
Interceptive timing (IntT) is a fundamental ability underpinning numerous actions (e.g. ball catching), but its development and relationship with other cognitive functions remains poorly understood. Piaget (1955) suggested that children need to learn the physical rules that govern their environment before they can represent abstract concepts such as number and time. Thus, learning how objects move in space and time may underpin the development of related abstract representations (i.e. mathematics). To test this hypothesis, we captured objective measures of IntT in 309 primary school children (4-11 years), alongside ‘general motor skill’ and ‘national standardized academic attainment’ scores. Bayesian estimation showed that IntT (but not general motor capability) uniquely predicted mathematical ability even after controlling for age, reading and writing attainment. This finding highlights that interceptive timing is distinct from other motor skills with specificity in predicting childhood mathematical ability independent of other forms of attainment and motor capability.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1334-1345 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Psychological Science |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 10 Jul 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2018 |
Keywords
- Interceptive Timing
- Mathematics
- Reading
- Writing
- Education
- Posture
- Fine motor
- gross motor
- educational neuroscience
- open data