Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries

Prabhath Thanuja Wagaarachchi, Wendy Jane Graham, Gillian Penney, A. McCaw-Binns, K. Yeboah Antwi, Marion Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

90 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of the study described is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of using a criterion-based clinical audit to measure and improve the quality of obstetric care at the district hospital level in developing countries. The focus is on the management of five life-threatening obstetric complications - hemorrhage, eclampsia, genital tract infection, obstructed labor and uterine rupture was audited using a 'before and after' design. The five steps of the audit cycle were followed: establish criteria of good quality care; measure current practice (Review I); feedback findings and set targets; take action to change practice; and re-evaluate practice (Review II). Systematic literature review, panel discussions and pilot work led to the development of 31 audit criteria. Review I included 555 life-threatening complications occurring over 66 hospital-months; Review II included 342 complications over 42 hospital-months, Many common areas for improvement were identified across the four hospitals. Agreed mechanisms for achieving these improvements included clinical protocols, reviews of staffing, and training workshops. Some aspects of clinical monitoring, drug use and record keeping improved significantly between Reviews I and II. Criterion-based clinical audit in four typical district hospitals in Ghana and Jamaica is a feasible and acceptable method for quality assurance and appears to have improved the management of life-threatening obstetric complications. (C) 2001 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-130
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume74
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • criterion-based clinical audit
  • obstetric complications
  • developing countries
  • quality of care

Cite this

Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries. / Wagaarachchi, Prabhath Thanuja; Graham, Wendy Jane; Penney, Gillian; McCaw-Binns, A.; Yeboah Antwi, K.; Hall, Marion.

In: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Vol. 74, 2001, p. 119-130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wagaarachchi, Prabhath Thanuja ; Graham, Wendy Jane ; Penney, Gillian ; McCaw-Binns, A. ; Yeboah Antwi, K. ; Hall, Marion. / Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries. In: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2001 ; Vol. 74. pp. 119-130.
@article{305b5e19afad4dbfb9f21b78aaeea0f1,
title = "Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries",
abstract = "The objective of the study described is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of using a criterion-based clinical audit to measure and improve the quality of obstetric care at the district hospital level in developing countries. The focus is on the management of five life-threatening obstetric complications - hemorrhage, eclampsia, genital tract infection, obstructed labor and uterine rupture was audited using a 'before and after' design. The five steps of the audit cycle were followed: establish criteria of good quality care; measure current practice (Review I); feedback findings and set targets; take action to change practice; and re-evaluate practice (Review II). Systematic literature review, panel discussions and pilot work led to the development of 31 audit criteria. Review I included 555 life-threatening complications occurring over 66 hospital-months; Review II included 342 complications over 42 hospital-months, Many common areas for improvement were identified across the four hospitals. Agreed mechanisms for achieving these improvements included clinical protocols, reviews of staffing, and training workshops. Some aspects of clinical monitoring, drug use and record keeping improved significantly between Reviews I and II. Criterion-based clinical audit in four typical district hospitals in Ghana and Jamaica is a feasible and acceptable method for quality assurance and appears to have improved the management of life-threatening obstetric complications. (C) 2001 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "criterion-based clinical audit, obstetric complications, developing countries, quality of care",
author = "Wagaarachchi, {Prabhath Thanuja} and Graham, {Wendy Jane} and Gillian Penney and A. McCaw-Binns and {Yeboah Antwi}, K. and Marion Hall",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00427-1",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "119--130",
journal = "International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics",
issn = "0020-7292",
publisher = "Wiley",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Holding up a mirror: changing obstetric practice through criterion-based clinical audit in developing countries

AU - Wagaarachchi, Prabhath Thanuja

AU - Graham, Wendy Jane

AU - Penney, Gillian

AU - McCaw-Binns, A.

AU - Yeboah Antwi, K.

AU - Hall, Marion

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The objective of the study described is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of using a criterion-based clinical audit to measure and improve the quality of obstetric care at the district hospital level in developing countries. The focus is on the management of five life-threatening obstetric complications - hemorrhage, eclampsia, genital tract infection, obstructed labor and uterine rupture was audited using a 'before and after' design. The five steps of the audit cycle were followed: establish criteria of good quality care; measure current practice (Review I); feedback findings and set targets; take action to change practice; and re-evaluate practice (Review II). Systematic literature review, panel discussions and pilot work led to the development of 31 audit criteria. Review I included 555 life-threatening complications occurring over 66 hospital-months; Review II included 342 complications over 42 hospital-months, Many common areas for improvement were identified across the four hospitals. Agreed mechanisms for achieving these improvements included clinical protocols, reviews of staffing, and training workshops. Some aspects of clinical monitoring, drug use and record keeping improved significantly between Reviews I and II. Criterion-based clinical audit in four typical district hospitals in Ghana and Jamaica is a feasible and acceptable method for quality assurance and appears to have improved the management of life-threatening obstetric complications. (C) 2001 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.

AB - The objective of the study described is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of using a criterion-based clinical audit to measure and improve the quality of obstetric care at the district hospital level in developing countries. The focus is on the management of five life-threatening obstetric complications - hemorrhage, eclampsia, genital tract infection, obstructed labor and uterine rupture was audited using a 'before and after' design. The five steps of the audit cycle were followed: establish criteria of good quality care; measure current practice (Review I); feedback findings and set targets; take action to change practice; and re-evaluate practice (Review II). Systematic literature review, panel discussions and pilot work led to the development of 31 audit criteria. Review I included 555 life-threatening complications occurring over 66 hospital-months; Review II included 342 complications over 42 hospital-months, Many common areas for improvement were identified across the four hospitals. Agreed mechanisms for achieving these improvements included clinical protocols, reviews of staffing, and training workshops. Some aspects of clinical monitoring, drug use and record keeping improved significantly between Reviews I and II. Criterion-based clinical audit in four typical district hospitals in Ghana and Jamaica is a feasible and acceptable method for quality assurance and appears to have improved the management of life-threatening obstetric complications. (C) 2001 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.

KW - criterion-based clinical audit

KW - obstetric complications

KW - developing countries

KW - quality of care

U2 - 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00427-1

DO - 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00427-1

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 119

EP - 130

JO - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

JF - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

SN - 0020-7292

ER -