Horkheimer, Religion, and the Normative Grounds of Critical Theory

Christopher Craig Brittain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This essay examines how the legacy of Marx’s emancipatory commitments continues to be intertwined with his critique of religion. This is illustrated with reference to Raymond Geuss‘s claim that Marxism’s political failure is related its lack of an adequate moral theory, a view that leads him to suggest that Marxism needs to function more like a “pseudoreligion.” These issues are analysed by drawing from Max Horkheimer’s writing on Christianity, which imply that materialist critical theory will be resourced by attention to particular historical expressions of religion. The paper argues that such an approach requires a distinction between two strands of Marx’s critique of religion – an “eliminationist” and a “descriptive functionalist” perspective – and involves privileging the second strand over the first. The implication is not that religion resolves the question of the ground of Marxism’s normative critique; rather, what is advanced is view that the critical theory can be supported and resourced by a critique of the “religion of everyday life.”
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-280
Number of pages22
JournalAnalyse & Kritik
Volume37
Issue number1-2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

critical theory
Religion
Marxism
Christianity
everyday life
Max Horkheimer
Critical Theory
commitment
lack
Critique of Religion

Keywords

  • Critical Theory
  • Horkheimer
  • Marxism

Cite this

Horkheimer, Religion, and the Normative Grounds of Critical Theory. / Brittain, Christopher Craig.

In: Analyse & Kritik, Vol. 37, No. 1-2, 2015, p. 259-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brittain, CC 2015, 'Horkheimer, Religion, and the Normative Grounds of Critical Theory', Analyse & Kritik, vol. 37, no. 1-2, pp. 259-280.
Brittain, Christopher Craig. / Horkheimer, Religion, and the Normative Grounds of Critical Theory. In: Analyse & Kritik. 2015 ; Vol. 37, No. 1-2. pp. 259-280.
@article{658cee3d1a4d4a44a2868ebf2d4ada5a,
title = "Horkheimer, Religion, and the Normative Grounds of Critical Theory",
abstract = "This essay examines how the legacy of Marx’s emancipatory commitments continues to be intertwined with his critique of religion. This is illustrated with reference to Raymond Geuss‘s claim that Marxism’s political failure is related its lack of an adequate moral theory, a view that leads him to suggest that Marxism needs to function more like a “pseudoreligion.” These issues are analysed by drawing from Max Horkheimer’s writing on Christianity, which imply that materialist critical theory will be resourced by attention to particular historical expressions of religion. The paper argues that such an approach requires a distinction between two strands of Marx’s critique of religion – an “eliminationist” and a “descriptive functionalist” perspective – and involves privileging the second strand over the first. The implication is not that religion resolves the question of the ground of Marxism’s normative critique; rather, what is advanced is view that the critical theory can be supported and resourced by a critique of the “religion of everyday life.”",
keywords = "Critical Theory, Horkheimer, Marxism",
author = "Brittain, {Christopher Craig}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "259--280",
journal = "Analyse & Kritik",
issn = "0171-5860",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Horkheimer, Religion, and the Normative Grounds of Critical Theory

AU - Brittain, Christopher Craig

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This essay examines how the legacy of Marx’s emancipatory commitments continues to be intertwined with his critique of religion. This is illustrated with reference to Raymond Geuss‘s claim that Marxism’s political failure is related its lack of an adequate moral theory, a view that leads him to suggest that Marxism needs to function more like a “pseudoreligion.” These issues are analysed by drawing from Max Horkheimer’s writing on Christianity, which imply that materialist critical theory will be resourced by attention to particular historical expressions of religion. The paper argues that such an approach requires a distinction between two strands of Marx’s critique of religion – an “eliminationist” and a “descriptive functionalist” perspective – and involves privileging the second strand over the first. The implication is not that religion resolves the question of the ground of Marxism’s normative critique; rather, what is advanced is view that the critical theory can be supported and resourced by a critique of the “religion of everyday life.”

AB - This essay examines how the legacy of Marx’s emancipatory commitments continues to be intertwined with his critique of religion. This is illustrated with reference to Raymond Geuss‘s claim that Marxism’s political failure is related its lack of an adequate moral theory, a view that leads him to suggest that Marxism needs to function more like a “pseudoreligion.” These issues are analysed by drawing from Max Horkheimer’s writing on Christianity, which imply that materialist critical theory will be resourced by attention to particular historical expressions of religion. The paper argues that such an approach requires a distinction between two strands of Marx’s critique of religion – an “eliminationist” and a “descriptive functionalist” perspective – and involves privileging the second strand over the first. The implication is not that religion resolves the question of the ground of Marxism’s normative critique; rather, what is advanced is view that the critical theory can be supported and resourced by a critique of the “religion of everyday life.”

KW - Critical Theory

KW - Horkheimer

KW - Marxism

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 259

EP - 280

JO - Analyse & Kritik

JF - Analyse & Kritik

SN - 0171-5860

IS - 1-2

ER -