Hospital volume does not influence long term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer

A. M. Thompson, T. Rapson, Fiona Jane Gilbert, K. G. Park, Scottish Audit Gastric Oesophageal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Guidelines suggest that surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer should be conducted in large cancer centres. This national study examined the relationship between hospital volume and outcome in Scotland.

Methods: This was a prospective, population-based study of 3293 consecutive patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 1999. Some 1302 patients underwent surgery and were followed for 5 years after operation.

Results: The 5-year adjusted overall survival rate for the 3293 patients was 18.7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 17.2 to 20.2) per cent and that after surgical resection was 39.6 (95 per cent c.i. 36.3 to 43.0) per cent. Death within 1 year after surgical resection was associated with a postoperative complication (odds ratio (OR) 2.5 (95 per cent c.i. 1.6 to 3.8); P < 0.001) or resection margin involvement by tumour (OR 7.2 (95 per cent c.i. 1.1 to 47.5); P = 0.042) after adjustment for age, sex and tumour location. There was no relationship between hospital volume and postoperative morbidity or mortality, nor between survival and volume of patients either for hospital of diagnosis or hospital of surgery.

Conclusion: This population-based study of oesophageal and gastric cancer suggests that the link between hospital volume and long-term survival for patients undergoing surgery requires re-evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)578-584
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume94
Issue number5
Early online date5 Apr 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Keywords

  • randomized controlled-trial
  • postoperative mortality
  • gastroesophageal cancer
  • chemotherapy
  • carcinoma
  • resection
  • adenocarcinoma
  • morbidity
  • stomach
  • cohort

Cite this

Thompson, A. M., Rapson, T., Gilbert, F. J., Park, K. G., & Scottish Audit Gastric Oesophageal (2007). Hospital volume does not influence long term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer. British Journal of Surgery, 94(5), 578-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5729

Hospital volume does not influence long term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer. / Thompson, A. M.; Rapson, T.; Gilbert, Fiona Jane; Park, K. G.; Scottish Audit Gastric Oesophageal.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 94, No. 5, 05.2007, p. 578-584.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thompson, AM, Rapson, T, Gilbert, FJ, Park, KG & Scottish Audit Gastric Oesophageal 2007, 'Hospital volume does not influence long term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer', British Journal of Surgery, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 578-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5729
Thompson, A. M. ; Rapson, T. ; Gilbert, Fiona Jane ; Park, K. G. ; Scottish Audit Gastric Oesophageal. / Hospital volume does not influence long term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 94, No. 5. pp. 578-584.
@article{68f472a643f7423fb1a37733af80f7f6,
title = "Hospital volume does not influence long term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer",
abstract = "Background: Guidelines suggest that surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer should be conducted in large cancer centres. This national study examined the relationship between hospital volume and outcome in Scotland.Methods: This was a prospective, population-based study of 3293 consecutive patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 1999. Some 1302 patients underwent surgery and were followed for 5 years after operation.Results: The 5-year adjusted overall survival rate for the 3293 patients was 18.7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 17.2 to 20.2) per cent and that after surgical resection was 39.6 (95 per cent c.i. 36.3 to 43.0) per cent. Death within 1 year after surgical resection was associated with a postoperative complication (odds ratio (OR) 2.5 (95 per cent c.i. 1.6 to 3.8); P < 0.001) or resection margin involvement by tumour (OR 7.2 (95 per cent c.i. 1.1 to 47.5); P = 0.042) after adjustment for age, sex and tumour location. There was no relationship between hospital volume and postoperative morbidity or mortality, nor between survival and volume of patients either for hospital of diagnosis or hospital of surgery.Conclusion: This population-based study of oesophageal and gastric cancer suggests that the link between hospital volume and long-term survival for patients undergoing surgery requires re-evaluation.",
keywords = "randomized controlled-trial, postoperative mortality, gastroesophageal cancer, chemotherapy, carcinoma, resection, adenocarcinoma, morbidity, stomach, cohort",
author = "Thompson, {A. M.} and T. Rapson and Gilbert, {Fiona Jane} and Park, {K. G.} and {Scottish Audit Gastric Oesophageal}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.5729",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "578--584",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "British Journal of Surgery",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hospital volume does not influence long term survival of patients undergoing surgery for oesophageal or gastric cancer

AU - Thompson, A. M.

AU - Rapson, T.

AU - Gilbert, Fiona Jane

AU - Park, K. G.

AU - Scottish Audit Gastric Oesophageal

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Background: Guidelines suggest that surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer should be conducted in large cancer centres. This national study examined the relationship between hospital volume and outcome in Scotland.Methods: This was a prospective, population-based study of 3293 consecutive patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 1999. Some 1302 patients underwent surgery and were followed for 5 years after operation.Results: The 5-year adjusted overall survival rate for the 3293 patients was 18.7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 17.2 to 20.2) per cent and that after surgical resection was 39.6 (95 per cent c.i. 36.3 to 43.0) per cent. Death within 1 year after surgical resection was associated with a postoperative complication (odds ratio (OR) 2.5 (95 per cent c.i. 1.6 to 3.8); P < 0.001) or resection margin involvement by tumour (OR 7.2 (95 per cent c.i. 1.1 to 47.5); P = 0.042) after adjustment for age, sex and tumour location. There was no relationship between hospital volume and postoperative morbidity or mortality, nor between survival and volume of patients either for hospital of diagnosis or hospital of surgery.Conclusion: This population-based study of oesophageal and gastric cancer suggests that the link between hospital volume and long-term survival for patients undergoing surgery requires re-evaluation.

AB - Background: Guidelines suggest that surgery for oesophageal and gastric cancer should be conducted in large cancer centres. This national study examined the relationship between hospital volume and outcome in Scotland.Methods: This was a prospective, population-based study of 3293 consecutive patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 1999. Some 1302 patients underwent surgery and were followed for 5 years after operation.Results: The 5-year adjusted overall survival rate for the 3293 patients was 18.7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 17.2 to 20.2) per cent and that after surgical resection was 39.6 (95 per cent c.i. 36.3 to 43.0) per cent. Death within 1 year after surgical resection was associated with a postoperative complication (odds ratio (OR) 2.5 (95 per cent c.i. 1.6 to 3.8); P < 0.001) or resection margin involvement by tumour (OR 7.2 (95 per cent c.i. 1.1 to 47.5); P = 0.042) after adjustment for age, sex and tumour location. There was no relationship between hospital volume and postoperative morbidity or mortality, nor between survival and volume of patients either for hospital of diagnosis or hospital of surgery.Conclusion: This population-based study of oesophageal and gastric cancer suggests that the link between hospital volume and long-term survival for patients undergoing surgery requires re-evaluation.

KW - randomized controlled-trial

KW - postoperative mortality

KW - gastroesophageal cancer

KW - chemotherapy

KW - carcinoma

KW - resection

KW - adenocarcinoma

KW - morbidity

KW - stomach

KW - cohort

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.5729

DO - 10.1002/bjs.5729

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 578

EP - 584

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 5

ER -