How accurate are the references in Emergency Medical Journal?

U Y Raja, J G Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of references in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All references cited in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003 were examined carefully, and the accuracy of the citations was checked against reliable electronic and manual resources. References were categorised as correct or incorrect. The errors were classified as minor if the integrity of the reference was not greatly compromised and major if the error severely detracted from the quality of the reference.

RESULTS: Overall, errors were found in 19% of all citations checked (n = 2561), and in 8% the errors were major and markedly detracted from the quality of the reference.

CONCLUSIONS: Citation errors reflect badly on authors and the publishing journal and may reflect underlying flaws in other areas of the research published. It is hoped that identification of this problem will lead to attempts to improve the accuracy of reference citation in the emergency medicine literature and to an improvement in the credibility of research in our specialty.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)625-626
Number of pages2
JournalEmergency Medicine Journal
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Emergencies
Medicine in Literature
Research

Keywords

  • Bibliography as Topic
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Periodicals as Topic
  • Publishing

Cite this

How accurate are the references in Emergency Medical Journal? / Raja, U Y; Cooper, J G.

In: Emergency Medicine Journal, Vol. 23, No. 8, 08.2006, p. 625-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raja, U Y ; Cooper, J G. / How accurate are the references in Emergency Medical Journal?. In: Emergency Medicine Journal. 2006 ; Vol. 23, No. 8. pp. 625-626.
@article{54b0621b4eb6470a9a7650c96c622ecd,
title = "How accurate are the references in Emergency Medical Journal?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of references in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003.MATERIALS AND METHODS: All references cited in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003 were examined carefully, and the accuracy of the citations was checked against reliable electronic and manual resources. References were categorised as correct or incorrect. The errors were classified as minor if the integrity of the reference was not greatly compromised and major if the error severely detracted from the quality of the reference.RESULTS: Overall, errors were found in 19{\%} of all citations checked (n = 2561), and in 8{\%} the errors were major and markedly detracted from the quality of the reference.CONCLUSIONS: Citation errors reflect badly on authors and the publishing journal and may reflect underlying flaws in other areas of the research published. It is hoped that identification of this problem will lead to attempts to improve the accuracy of reference citation in the emergency medicine literature and to an improvement in the credibility of research in our specialty.",
keywords = "Bibliography as Topic, Emergency Medicine, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing",
author = "Raja, {U Y} and Cooper, {J G}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1136/emj.2004.022103",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "625--626",
journal = "Emergency Medicine Journal",
issn = "1472-0205",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How accurate are the references in Emergency Medical Journal?

AU - Raja, U Y

AU - Cooper, J G

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of references in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003.MATERIALS AND METHODS: All references cited in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003 were examined carefully, and the accuracy of the citations was checked against reliable electronic and manual resources. References were categorised as correct or incorrect. The errors were classified as minor if the integrity of the reference was not greatly compromised and major if the error severely detracted from the quality of the reference.RESULTS: Overall, errors were found in 19% of all citations checked (n = 2561), and in 8% the errors were major and markedly detracted from the quality of the reference.CONCLUSIONS: Citation errors reflect badly on authors and the publishing journal and may reflect underlying flaws in other areas of the research published. It is hoped that identification of this problem will lead to attempts to improve the accuracy of reference citation in the emergency medicine literature and to an improvement in the credibility of research in our specialty.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of references in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003.MATERIALS AND METHODS: All references cited in Emergency Medicine Journal during 2003 were examined carefully, and the accuracy of the citations was checked against reliable electronic and manual resources. References were categorised as correct or incorrect. The errors were classified as minor if the integrity of the reference was not greatly compromised and major if the error severely detracted from the quality of the reference.RESULTS: Overall, errors were found in 19% of all citations checked (n = 2561), and in 8% the errors were major and markedly detracted from the quality of the reference.CONCLUSIONS: Citation errors reflect badly on authors and the publishing journal and may reflect underlying flaws in other areas of the research published. It is hoped that identification of this problem will lead to attempts to improve the accuracy of reference citation in the emergency medicine literature and to an improvement in the credibility of research in our specialty.

KW - Bibliography as Topic

KW - Emergency Medicine

KW - Periodicals as Topic

KW - Publishing

U2 - 10.1136/emj.2004.022103

DO - 10.1136/emj.2004.022103

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 625

EP - 626

JO - Emergency Medicine Journal

JF - Emergency Medicine Journal

SN - 1472-0205

IS - 8

ER -