How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation

Louise Locock, Catherine M. Montgomery* (Corresponding Author), Stephen Parkin, Alison Chisholm, Jennifer Bostock, Sue Dopson, Melanie Gager, Elizabeth Gibbons, Chris Graham, Jenny King, Angela Martin, John Powell, Sue Ziebland

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives

Improving patient experience is widely regarded as a key component of health care quality. However, while a considerable amount of data are collected about patient experience, there are concerns this information is not always used to improve care. This study explored whether and how frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement.

Methods

We conducted a year-long ethnographic case study evaluation, including 299 hours of observations and 95 interviews, of how frontline staff in six medical wards at different hospital sites in the United Kingdom used patient experience data for improvement.

Results

In every site, staff undertook quality improvement projects using a range of data sources. Teams of health care practitioners and ancillary staff engaged collectively in a process of sense-making using formal and informal sources of patient experience data. While survey data were popular, 'soft' intelligence - such as patients' stories, informal comments and observations - also informed staff's improvement plans, without always being recognized as data. Teams with staff from different professional backgrounds and grades tended to make more progress than less diverse teams, being able to draw on a wider net of practical, organizational and social resources, support and skills, which we describe as team-based capital.

Conclusions

Organizational recognition, or rejection, of specific forms of patient experience intelligence as 'data' affects whether staff feel the data are actionable. Teams combining a diverse range of staff generated higher levels of 'team-based capital' for quality improvement than those adopting a single disciplinary approach. This may be a key mechanism for achieving person-centred improvement in health care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-161
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Health Services Research & Policy
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date14 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • learning community
  • patient experience data
  • team-based capital
  • QUALITY
  • CHALLENGES
  • FEEDBACK
  • SOFT INTELLIGENCE

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Locock, L., Montgomery, C. M., Parkin, S., Chisholm, A., Bostock, J., Dopson, S., Gager, M., Gibbons, E., Graham, C., King, J., Martin, A., Powell, J., & Ziebland, S. (2020). How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 25(3), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819619888675