How do policy advisors and practitioners prioritise the protection of children from secondhand smoke exposure in a country with advanced tobacco control policy?

Deborah Doreen Ritchie, Amanda Amos, April Shaw, Rachel O'Donnell, Sean Semple, Steve Turner, Claudia Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract


Objectives The aim is to extend understanding of the policy and practice discourses that inform the development of national tobacco control policy to protect children from secondhand smoke exposure (SHSE) in the home, particularly in a country with successful implementation of smoke-free public places legislation. The Scottish experience will contribute to the tobacco control community, particularly those countries at a similar level of tobacco control, as normalising discourses about protecting children from SHSE are becoming more widespread.


Design Case study design using qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) with policy makers, health and childcare practitioners during which they were presented with the findings of the Reducing Families' Exposure to Secondhand Smoke (REFRESH) intervention and discussed the implications for their policy and practice priorities.


Setting Scotland, UK


Participants Qualitative interviews and FGs were conducted with 30 policy makers and practitioners who were purposively recruited.


Results Participants accepted the harm of SHSE to children; however, action is limited by political expedience due to—the perception of a shift of the public health priority from smoking to alcohol, current financial constraints, more immediate child protection concerns and continuing unresolved ethical arguments.


Conclusions In a country, such as Scotland, with advanced tobacco control strategies, there continue to be challenges to policy and practice development in the more contentious arena of the home. Children's SHSE in their homes is unequivocally accepted as an important health priority, but it is not currently perceived to be a top public health priority in Scotland.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-76
Number of pages7
JournalTobacco Control
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date16 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Tobacco Smoke Pollution
nicotine
Tobacco
Health Priorities
Scotland
qualitative interview
Focus Groups
Administrative Personnel
public health
Public Health
discourse
Interviews
child protection
health
Policy Making
smoking
Legislation
Group
Smoke
legislation

Keywords

  • Children
  • Protection
  • Secondhand smoke
  • tobacco control policy

Cite this

How do policy advisors and practitioners prioritise the protection of children from secondhand smoke exposure in a country with advanced tobacco control policy? / Ritchie, Deborah Doreen; Amos, Amanda; Shaw, April; O'Donnell, Rachel; Semple, Sean; Turner, Steve; Martin, Claudia.

In: Tobacco Control, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2015, p. 70-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ritchie, Deborah Doreen ; Amos, Amanda ; Shaw, April ; O'Donnell, Rachel ; Semple, Sean ; Turner, Steve ; Martin, Claudia. / How do policy advisors and practitioners prioritise the protection of children from secondhand smoke exposure in a country with advanced tobacco control policy?. In: Tobacco Control. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 70-76.
@article{24ac35cfb7844a54852b8d9e64a99f83,
title = "How do policy advisors and practitioners prioritise the protection of children from secondhand smoke exposure in a country with advanced tobacco control policy?",
abstract = "Objectives The aim is to extend understanding of the policy and practice discourses that inform the development of national tobacco control policy to protect children from secondhand smoke exposure (SHSE) in the home, particularly in a country with successful implementation of smoke-free public places legislation. The Scottish experience will contribute to the tobacco control community, particularly those countries at a similar level of tobacco control, as normalising discourses about protecting children from SHSE are becoming more widespread. Design Case study design using qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) with policy makers, health and childcare practitioners during which they were presented with the findings of the Reducing Families' Exposure to Secondhand Smoke (REFRESH) intervention and discussed the implications for their policy and practice priorities. Setting Scotland, UK Participants Qualitative interviews and FGs were conducted with 30 policy makers and practitioners who were purposively recruited. Results Participants accepted the harm of SHSE to children; however, action is limited by political expedience due to—the perception of a shift of the public health priority from smoking to alcohol, current financial constraints, more immediate child protection concerns and continuing unresolved ethical arguments. Conclusions In a country, such as Scotland, with advanced tobacco control strategies, there continue to be challenges to policy and practice development in the more contentious arena of the home. Children's SHSE in their homes is unequivocally accepted as an important health priority, but it is not currently perceived to be a top public health priority in Scotland.",
keywords = "Children, Protection, Secondhand smoke, tobacco control policy",
author = "Ritchie, {Deborah Doreen} and Amanda Amos and April Shaw and Rachel O'Donnell and Sean Semple and Steve Turner and Claudia Martin",
note = "Acknowledgements We are grateful to all the participants who took part in this study.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050936",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "70--76",
journal = "Tobacco Control",
issn = "0964-4563",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do policy advisors and practitioners prioritise the protection of children from secondhand smoke exposure in a country with advanced tobacco control policy?

AU - Ritchie, Deborah Doreen

AU - Amos, Amanda

AU - Shaw, April

AU - O'Donnell, Rachel

AU - Semple, Sean

AU - Turner, Steve

AU - Martin, Claudia

N1 - Acknowledgements We are grateful to all the participants who took part in this study.

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Objectives The aim is to extend understanding of the policy and practice discourses that inform the development of national tobacco control policy to protect children from secondhand smoke exposure (SHSE) in the home, particularly in a country with successful implementation of smoke-free public places legislation. The Scottish experience will contribute to the tobacco control community, particularly those countries at a similar level of tobacco control, as normalising discourses about protecting children from SHSE are becoming more widespread. Design Case study design using qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) with policy makers, health and childcare practitioners during which they were presented with the findings of the Reducing Families' Exposure to Secondhand Smoke (REFRESH) intervention and discussed the implications for their policy and practice priorities. Setting Scotland, UK Participants Qualitative interviews and FGs were conducted with 30 policy makers and practitioners who were purposively recruited. Results Participants accepted the harm of SHSE to children; however, action is limited by political expedience due to—the perception of a shift of the public health priority from smoking to alcohol, current financial constraints, more immediate child protection concerns and continuing unresolved ethical arguments. Conclusions In a country, such as Scotland, with advanced tobacco control strategies, there continue to be challenges to policy and practice development in the more contentious arena of the home. Children's SHSE in their homes is unequivocally accepted as an important health priority, but it is not currently perceived to be a top public health priority in Scotland.

AB - Objectives The aim is to extend understanding of the policy and practice discourses that inform the development of national tobacco control policy to protect children from secondhand smoke exposure (SHSE) in the home, particularly in a country with successful implementation of smoke-free public places legislation. The Scottish experience will contribute to the tobacco control community, particularly those countries at a similar level of tobacco control, as normalising discourses about protecting children from SHSE are becoming more widespread. Design Case study design using qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) with policy makers, health and childcare practitioners during which they were presented with the findings of the Reducing Families' Exposure to Secondhand Smoke (REFRESH) intervention and discussed the implications for their policy and practice priorities. Setting Scotland, UK Participants Qualitative interviews and FGs were conducted with 30 policy makers and practitioners who were purposively recruited. Results Participants accepted the harm of SHSE to children; however, action is limited by political expedience due to—the perception of a shift of the public health priority from smoking to alcohol, current financial constraints, more immediate child protection concerns and continuing unresolved ethical arguments. Conclusions In a country, such as Scotland, with advanced tobacco control strategies, there continue to be challenges to policy and practice development in the more contentious arena of the home. Children's SHSE in their homes is unequivocally accepted as an important health priority, but it is not currently perceived to be a top public health priority in Scotland.

KW - Children

KW - Protection

KW - Secondhand smoke

KW - tobacco control policy

U2 - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050936

DO - 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050936

M3 - Article

C2 - 23956059

VL - 24

SP - 70

EP - 76

JO - Tobacco Control

JF - Tobacco Control

SN - 0964-4563

IS - 1

ER -