How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK

Katrin Prager* (Corresponding Author), Pierre Labarthe (Corresponding Author), Monica Caggiano, Altea Lorenzo-Arribas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Farm advisory services have returned to both the academic and the political agenda. Commercialisation charging a fee for an advisory service is a trend observed not only in private advisory organisations, but to some extent also in public and other types of organisations. This paper explores how commercialisation of farm advice impacts on the quality of services. Based on key informant interviews and a unique data set from a survey of 227 advisory organisations across four European countries, both the front-office and the back-office dimension were investigated. The paper compares private organisations that draw income from charging for their services with non-private organisations (public, non-governmental and farmer-based organisations). We found that the private organisations are typically small and medium size enterprises that employ fewer advisors than non-private organisations. Their services are more personalised, that is, they have a higher proportion of 1:1 advice and they have a lower ratio of farms per advisor. With regard to the back office dimension, they differ little from non-private organisations in terms of training their advisors but have considerably lower levels of investment in research and development, and tend to rely on peer-to-peer networks and cooperation with other private consultancies and public authorities. We conclude that commercialised advice has several advantages but favours affluent clients. It is essential for commercial advisory services to be complemented with other services that reach different types of farmers, and that public support is available to improve the knowledge flows between public research and private organisations. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-344
Number of pages16
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume52
Early online date12 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2016

Keywords

  • Commercialisation
  • Privatisation
  • Extension
  • Agricultural advisory services
  • Europe

Cite this

How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK. / Prager, Katrin (Corresponding Author); Labarthe, Pierre (Corresponding Author); Caggiano, Monica; Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 52, 03.2016, p. 329-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a13df983c7ad4c7c988f7ed2cb35615a,
title = "How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK",
abstract = "Farm advisory services have returned to both the academic and the political agenda. Commercialisation charging a fee for an advisory service is a trend observed not only in private advisory organisations, but to some extent also in public and other types of organisations. This paper explores how commercialisation of farm advice impacts on the quality of services. Based on key informant interviews and a unique data set from a survey of 227 advisory organisations across four European countries, both the front-office and the back-office dimension were investigated. The paper compares private organisations that draw income from charging for their services with non-private organisations (public, non-governmental and farmer-based organisations). We found that the private organisations are typically small and medium size enterprises that employ fewer advisors than non-private organisations. Their services are more personalised, that is, they have a higher proportion of 1:1 advice and they have a lower ratio of farms per advisor. With regard to the back office dimension, they differ little from non-private organisations in terms of training their advisors but have considerably lower levels of investment in research and development, and tend to rely on peer-to-peer networks and cooperation with other private consultancies and public authorities. We conclude that commercialised advice has several advantages but favours affluent clients. It is essential for commercial advisory services to be complemented with other services that reach different types of farmers, and that public support is available to improve the knowledge flows between public research and private organisations. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.",
keywords = "Commercialisation, Privatisation, Extension, Agricultural advisory services, Europe",
author = "Katrin Prager and Pierre Labarthe and Monica Caggiano and Altea Lorenzo-Arribas",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.024",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "329--344",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK

AU - Prager, Katrin

AU - Labarthe, Pierre

AU - Caggiano, Monica

AU - Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea

PY - 2016/3

Y1 - 2016/3

N2 - Farm advisory services have returned to both the academic and the political agenda. Commercialisation charging a fee for an advisory service is a trend observed not only in private advisory organisations, but to some extent also in public and other types of organisations. This paper explores how commercialisation of farm advice impacts on the quality of services. Based on key informant interviews and a unique data set from a survey of 227 advisory organisations across four European countries, both the front-office and the back-office dimension were investigated. The paper compares private organisations that draw income from charging for their services with non-private organisations (public, non-governmental and farmer-based organisations). We found that the private organisations are typically small and medium size enterprises that employ fewer advisors than non-private organisations. Their services are more personalised, that is, they have a higher proportion of 1:1 advice and they have a lower ratio of farms per advisor. With regard to the back office dimension, they differ little from non-private organisations in terms of training their advisors but have considerably lower levels of investment in research and development, and tend to rely on peer-to-peer networks and cooperation with other private consultancies and public authorities. We conclude that commercialised advice has several advantages but favours affluent clients. It is essential for commercial advisory services to be complemented with other services that reach different types of farmers, and that public support is available to improve the knowledge flows between public research and private organisations. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

AB - Farm advisory services have returned to both the academic and the political agenda. Commercialisation charging a fee for an advisory service is a trend observed not only in private advisory organisations, but to some extent also in public and other types of organisations. This paper explores how commercialisation of farm advice impacts on the quality of services. Based on key informant interviews and a unique data set from a survey of 227 advisory organisations across four European countries, both the front-office and the back-office dimension were investigated. The paper compares private organisations that draw income from charging for their services with non-private organisations (public, non-governmental and farmer-based organisations). We found that the private organisations are typically small and medium size enterprises that employ fewer advisors than non-private organisations. Their services are more personalised, that is, they have a higher proportion of 1:1 advice and they have a lower ratio of farms per advisor. With regard to the back office dimension, they differ little from non-private organisations in terms of training their advisors but have considerably lower levels of investment in research and development, and tend to rely on peer-to-peer networks and cooperation with other private consultancies and public authorities. We conclude that commercialised advice has several advantages but favours affluent clients. It is essential for commercial advisory services to be complemented with other services that reach different types of farmers, and that public support is available to improve the knowledge flows between public research and private organisations. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

KW - Commercialisation

KW - Privatisation

KW - Extension

KW - Agricultural advisory services

KW - Europe

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.024

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.024

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 329

EP - 344

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

ER -