How Historical is the History of Religions?

Robert A. Segal*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

How historical the history of religions is has long been debated. This chapter details Skinner's approach to history of political thought. Skinner distinguishes three kinds of historical questions that can be asked of the works of political thinkers. Textualists do so for two seemingly opposed reasons. One, the meaning they seek does not go beyond what the author has stated in the work. And two, that meaning is not limited to the times in which the author lived. Skinner distinguishes even this kind of intent from the meaning, which would be the theme of the tragedy. Eliade is right to assume a symmetry between explanation and interpretation. A Freudian explanation of the cause of religion does pre-suppose a Freudian interpretation of the meaning of it. In his History of Religious Ideas, which is virtually a foil to Patterns, Eliade focuses on individual religions rather than on religion per se.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTheory and Method in the Study of Religion
Subtitle of host publicationTwenty Five Years On
EditorsAaron W. Hughes
PublisherBrill
Pages29-43
Number of pages15
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9789004257573
ISBN (Print)9789004256019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Sep 2013

Publication series

NameSupplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion
PublisherBrill
Volume1
ISSN (Print)2214-3270

Fingerprint

Religion
History of Religion
Mircea Eliade
History
History of Political Thought
Thinkers
Symmetry
Causes
Tragedy
Sigmund Freud

Keywords

  • Eliade
  • Skinner
  • Freudian
  • History of Religious Ideas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Segal, R. A. (2013). How Historical is the History of Religions? In A. W. Hughes (Ed.), Theory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty Five Years On (Vol. 1, pp. 29-43). (Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion; Vol. 1). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004257573_005

How Historical is the History of Religions? / Segal, Robert A.

Theory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty Five Years On. ed. / Aaron W. Hughes. Vol. 1 Brill, 2013. p. 29-43 (Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion; Vol. 1).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Segal, RA 2013, How Historical is the History of Religions? in AW Hughes (ed.), Theory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty Five Years On. vol. 1, Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, vol. 1, Brill, pp. 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004257573_005
Segal RA. How Historical is the History of Religions? In Hughes AW, editor, Theory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty Five Years On. Vol. 1. Brill. 2013. p. 29-43. (Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004257573_005
Segal, Robert A. / How Historical is the History of Religions?. Theory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty Five Years On. editor / Aaron W. Hughes. Vol. 1 Brill, 2013. pp. 29-43 (Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion).
@inbook{60edf7b336dc44228b0c8e1ff1437bf2,
title = "How Historical is the History of Religions?",
abstract = "How historical the history of religions is has long been debated. This chapter details Skinner's approach to history of political thought. Skinner distinguishes three kinds of historical questions that can be asked of the works of political thinkers. Textualists do so for two seemingly opposed reasons. One, the meaning they seek does not go beyond what the author has stated in the work. And two, that meaning is not limited to the times in which the author lived. Skinner distinguishes even this kind of intent from the meaning, which would be the theme of the tragedy. Eliade is right to assume a symmetry between explanation and interpretation. A Freudian explanation of the cause of religion does pre-suppose a Freudian interpretation of the meaning of it. In his History of Religious Ideas, which is virtually a foil to Patterns, Eliade focuses on individual religions rather than on religion per se.",
keywords = "Eliade, Skinner, Freudian, History of Religious Ideas",
author = "Segal, {Robert A.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1163/9789004257573_005",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789004256019",
volume = "1",
series = "Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion",
publisher = "Brill",
pages = "29--43",
editor = "Hughes, {Aaron W.}",
booktitle = "Theory and Method in the Study of Religion",
address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - How Historical is the History of Religions?

AU - Segal, Robert A.

PY - 2013/9/25

Y1 - 2013/9/25

N2 - How historical the history of religions is has long been debated. This chapter details Skinner's approach to history of political thought. Skinner distinguishes three kinds of historical questions that can be asked of the works of political thinkers. Textualists do so for two seemingly opposed reasons. One, the meaning they seek does not go beyond what the author has stated in the work. And two, that meaning is not limited to the times in which the author lived. Skinner distinguishes even this kind of intent from the meaning, which would be the theme of the tragedy. Eliade is right to assume a symmetry between explanation and interpretation. A Freudian explanation of the cause of religion does pre-suppose a Freudian interpretation of the meaning of it. In his History of Religious Ideas, which is virtually a foil to Patterns, Eliade focuses on individual religions rather than on religion per se.

AB - How historical the history of religions is has long been debated. This chapter details Skinner's approach to history of political thought. Skinner distinguishes three kinds of historical questions that can be asked of the works of political thinkers. Textualists do so for two seemingly opposed reasons. One, the meaning they seek does not go beyond what the author has stated in the work. And two, that meaning is not limited to the times in which the author lived. Skinner distinguishes even this kind of intent from the meaning, which would be the theme of the tragedy. Eliade is right to assume a symmetry between explanation and interpretation. A Freudian explanation of the cause of religion does pre-suppose a Freudian interpretation of the meaning of it. In his History of Religious Ideas, which is virtually a foil to Patterns, Eliade focuses on individual religions rather than on religion per se.

KW - Eliade

KW - Skinner

KW - Freudian

KW - History of Religious Ideas

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943607441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/9789004257573_005

DO - 10.1163/9789004257573_005

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789004256019

VL - 1

T3 - Supplements to Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

SP - 29

EP - 43

BT - Theory and Method in the Study of Religion

A2 - Hughes, Aaron W.

PB - Brill

ER -