How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review

L. E. M. Reid, A. J. F. Crookshanks, M. C. Jones, Z. J. Morrison, N. I. Lone, C. J. Weir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The majority of medical patients presenting to hospital in the UK are cared for in acute medical units (AMUs). Such units are also increasingly present internationally. Care delivery varies across units: this review aims to examine the evidence for how best to deliver AMU care.

Six electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria comprised interventions applied to undifferentiated patients in AMU settings. All studies were quality assessed. A narrative approach was undertaken.

Nine studies, all conducted in the UK or Ireland, evaluated 1.3 million episodes, 3617 patients and 49 staff. There was single study evidence for beneficial effects of: enhanced pharmacy care, a dedicated occupational therapy service, an all-inclusive consultant work pattern, a rapid-access medical clinic and formalized handovers. Two studies found increased consultant presence was associated with reduced mortality; one of these studies found an association with a reduction in 28-day readmissions; and the other found an association with an increased proportion of patients discharged on the day they were admitted. Three studies provide evidence of the beneficial effects of multiple interventions developed from local service reviews.

Overall, the quality of the evidence was limited. This review has identified operationally relevant evidence that increased consultant presence is associated with improved outcomes of care; has highlighted the potential to improve outcomes locally through service reviews; and has demonstrated an important knowledge gap of how best to deliver AMU care. These findings have importance given the challenges acute services currently face.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)515-523
Number of pages9
JournalQJM
Volume111
Issue number8
Early online date4 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Consultants
Literature
Occupational Therapy
Ireland
Databases
Mortality

Cite this

Reid, L. E. M., Crookshanks, A. J. F., Jones, M. C., Morrison, Z. J., Lone, N. I., & Weir, C. J. (2018). How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review. QJM, 111(8), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcx161

How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review. / Reid, L. E. M.; Crookshanks, A. J. F.; Jones, M. C.; Morrison, Z. J.; Lone, N. I.; Weir, C. J.

In: QJM, Vol. 111, No. 8, 08.2018, p. 515-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reid, LEM, Crookshanks, AJF, Jones, MC, Morrison, ZJ, Lone, NI & Weir, CJ 2018, 'How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review', QJM, vol. 111, no. 8, pp. 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcx161
Reid LEM, Crookshanks AJF, Jones MC, Morrison ZJ, Lone NI, Weir CJ. How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review. QJM. 2018 Aug;111(8):515-523. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcx161
Reid, L. E. M. ; Crookshanks, A. J. F. ; Jones, M. C. ; Morrison, Z. J. ; Lone, N. I. ; Weir, C. J. / How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review. In: QJM. 2018 ; Vol. 111, No. 8. pp. 515-523.
@article{fb73ab31fccd4abab627abbf58d432c1,
title = "How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review",
abstract = "The majority of medical patients presenting to hospital in the UK are cared for in acute medical units (AMUs). Such units are also increasingly present internationally. Care delivery varies across units: this review aims to examine the evidence for how best to deliver AMU care.Six electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria comprised interventions applied to undifferentiated patients in AMU settings. All studies were quality assessed. A narrative approach was undertaken.Nine studies, all conducted in the UK or Ireland, evaluated 1.3 million episodes, 3617 patients and 49 staff. There was single study evidence for beneficial effects of: enhanced pharmacy care, a dedicated occupational therapy service, an all-inclusive consultant work pattern, a rapid-access medical clinic and formalized handovers. Two studies found increased consultant presence was associated with reduced mortality; one of these studies found an association with a reduction in 28-day readmissions; and the other found an association with an increased proportion of patients discharged on the day they were admitted. Three studies provide evidence of the beneficial effects of multiple interventions developed from local service reviews.Overall, the quality of the evidence was limited. This review has identified operationally relevant evidence that increased consultant presence is associated with improved outcomes of care; has highlighted the potential to improve outcomes locally through service reviews; and has demonstrated an important knowledge gap of how best to deliver AMU care. These findings have importance given the challenges acute services currently face.",
author = "Reid, {L. E. M.} and Crookshanks, {A. J. F.} and Jones, {M. C.} and Morrison, {Z. J.} and Lone, {N. I.} and Weir, {C. J.}",
note = "Funding This work has been supported by The Scottish Government and the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. CJW was supported in this work by NHS Lothian via the Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1093/qjmed/hcx161",
language = "English",
volume = "111",
pages = "515--523",
journal = "QJM",
issn = "1460-2725",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How is it best to deliver care in acute medical units? A systematic review

AU - Reid, L. E. M.

AU - Crookshanks, A. J. F.

AU - Jones, M. C.

AU - Morrison, Z. J.

AU - Lone, N. I.

AU - Weir, C. J.

N1 - Funding This work has been supported by The Scottish Government and the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. CJW was supported in this work by NHS Lothian via the Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - The majority of medical patients presenting to hospital in the UK are cared for in acute medical units (AMUs). Such units are also increasingly present internationally. Care delivery varies across units: this review aims to examine the evidence for how best to deliver AMU care.Six electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria comprised interventions applied to undifferentiated patients in AMU settings. All studies were quality assessed. A narrative approach was undertaken.Nine studies, all conducted in the UK or Ireland, evaluated 1.3 million episodes, 3617 patients and 49 staff. There was single study evidence for beneficial effects of: enhanced pharmacy care, a dedicated occupational therapy service, an all-inclusive consultant work pattern, a rapid-access medical clinic and formalized handovers. Two studies found increased consultant presence was associated with reduced mortality; one of these studies found an association with a reduction in 28-day readmissions; and the other found an association with an increased proportion of patients discharged on the day they were admitted. Three studies provide evidence of the beneficial effects of multiple interventions developed from local service reviews.Overall, the quality of the evidence was limited. This review has identified operationally relevant evidence that increased consultant presence is associated with improved outcomes of care; has highlighted the potential to improve outcomes locally through service reviews; and has demonstrated an important knowledge gap of how best to deliver AMU care. These findings have importance given the challenges acute services currently face.

AB - The majority of medical patients presenting to hospital in the UK are cared for in acute medical units (AMUs). Such units are also increasingly present internationally. Care delivery varies across units: this review aims to examine the evidence for how best to deliver AMU care.Six electronic databases and grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria comprised interventions applied to undifferentiated patients in AMU settings. All studies were quality assessed. A narrative approach was undertaken.Nine studies, all conducted in the UK or Ireland, evaluated 1.3 million episodes, 3617 patients and 49 staff. There was single study evidence for beneficial effects of: enhanced pharmacy care, a dedicated occupational therapy service, an all-inclusive consultant work pattern, a rapid-access medical clinic and formalized handovers. Two studies found increased consultant presence was associated with reduced mortality; one of these studies found an association with a reduction in 28-day readmissions; and the other found an association with an increased proportion of patients discharged on the day they were admitted. Three studies provide evidence of the beneficial effects of multiple interventions developed from local service reviews.Overall, the quality of the evidence was limited. This review has identified operationally relevant evidence that increased consultant presence is associated with improved outcomes of care; has highlighted the potential to improve outcomes locally through service reviews; and has demonstrated an important knowledge gap of how best to deliver AMU care. These findings have importance given the challenges acute services currently face.

U2 - 10.1093/qjmed/hcx161

DO - 10.1093/qjmed/hcx161

M3 - Article

VL - 111

SP - 515

EP - 523

JO - QJM

JF - QJM

SN - 1460-2725

IS - 8

ER -