How people present symptoms to health services

a theory-based content analysis

Barbara Farquharson, Marie Johnston, Carol Bugge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background

How people present symptoms to health services may influence the care they subsequently receive. Leventhal's Commonsense Model of Self-Regulation (CS-SRM) posits that individuals develop cognitive illness representations elaborated around five main components (identity, timeline, cause, consequences, and cure/control), coherence, and emotional representations.

Aim

To examine whether initial presentations to health services consist of the components of illness representation proposed by the CS-SRM.

Design and setting

A CS-SRM-based content analysis of calls to the Scottish national telephone advice service, NHS 24.

Method

A random sample of callers to NHS 24 was identified. A quota sample of 60 consented to participate. Their consultations were transcribed verbatim. Responses to an initial open question regarding the reason for calling were identified and divided into `meaning units'. A coding schedule was developed using Leventhal's definitions of illness representations. Meaning units were coded independently by two researchers.

Results

Fifty-nine eligible initial presentations contained between 1 and 13 coding units, (mean = 4). A total of 230 coding units were available for coding. Overall, 202 (88%) coding units were coded to at least one component of illness representation. All 59 (100%) participants made reference to identity, 26 (44%) to timeline, nine (15%) to cause, eight (14%) to consequences, 22 (37%) to cure/control, and 11 (19%) to the degree of coherence. Emotional representations were identified in six (10%) participants' presentations.

Conclusion

Leventhal's CS-SRM accounts for a large proportion of initial presentations to health services. Most people offer identity plus at least one additional component of illness representation. It may be necessary for clinicians to prompt remaining components to obtain a comprehensive understanding of patients' representations of illness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)267-273
Number of pages7
JournalThe British Journal of General Practice
Volume61
Issue number585
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Health Services
Telephone
Appointments and Schedules
Referral and Consultation
Research Personnel
TimeLine

Keywords

  • consultation
  • symptoms
  • telephone triage

Cite this

How people present symptoms to health services : a theory-based content analysis. / Farquharson, Barbara; Johnston, Marie; Bugge, Carol.

In: The British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 61, No. 585, 04.2011, p. 267-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b4bc84395f524003a2a8c8be08416bd9,
title = "How people present symptoms to health services: a theory-based content analysis",
abstract = "Background How people present symptoms to health services may influence the care they subsequently receive. Leventhal's Commonsense Model of Self-Regulation (CS-SRM) posits that individuals develop cognitive illness representations elaborated around five main components (identity, timeline, cause, consequences, and cure/control), coherence, and emotional representations. Aim To examine whether initial presentations to health services consist of the components of illness representation proposed by the CS-SRM. Design and setting A CS-SRM-based content analysis of calls to the Scottish national telephone advice service, NHS 24. Method A random sample of callers to NHS 24 was identified. A quota sample of 60 consented to participate. Their consultations were transcribed verbatim. Responses to an initial open question regarding the reason for calling were identified and divided into `meaning units'. A coding schedule was developed using Leventhal's definitions of illness representations. Meaning units were coded independently by two researchers. Results Fifty-nine eligible initial presentations contained between 1 and 13 coding units, (mean = 4). A total of 230 coding units were available for coding. Overall, 202 (88{\%}) coding units were coded to at least one component of illness representation. All 59 (100{\%}) participants made reference to identity, 26 (44{\%}) to timeline, nine (15{\%}) to cause, eight (14{\%}) to consequences, 22 (37{\%}) to cure/control, and 11 (19{\%}) to the degree of coherence. Emotional representations were identified in six (10{\%}) participants' presentations. Conclusion Leventhal's CS-SRM accounts for a large proportion of initial presentations to health services. Most people offer identity plus at least one additional component of illness representation. It may be necessary for clinicians to prompt remaining components to obtain a comprehensive understanding of patients' representations of illness.",
keywords = "consultation, symptoms, telephone triage",
author = "Barbara Farquharson and Marie Johnston and Carol Bugge",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.3399/bjgp11X567090",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "267--273",
journal = "The British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "585",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How people present symptoms to health services

T2 - a theory-based content analysis

AU - Farquharson, Barbara

AU - Johnston, Marie

AU - Bugge, Carol

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Background How people present symptoms to health services may influence the care they subsequently receive. Leventhal's Commonsense Model of Self-Regulation (CS-SRM) posits that individuals develop cognitive illness representations elaborated around five main components (identity, timeline, cause, consequences, and cure/control), coherence, and emotional representations. Aim To examine whether initial presentations to health services consist of the components of illness representation proposed by the CS-SRM. Design and setting A CS-SRM-based content analysis of calls to the Scottish national telephone advice service, NHS 24. Method A random sample of callers to NHS 24 was identified. A quota sample of 60 consented to participate. Their consultations were transcribed verbatim. Responses to an initial open question regarding the reason for calling were identified and divided into `meaning units'. A coding schedule was developed using Leventhal's definitions of illness representations. Meaning units were coded independently by two researchers. Results Fifty-nine eligible initial presentations contained between 1 and 13 coding units, (mean = 4). A total of 230 coding units were available for coding. Overall, 202 (88%) coding units were coded to at least one component of illness representation. All 59 (100%) participants made reference to identity, 26 (44%) to timeline, nine (15%) to cause, eight (14%) to consequences, 22 (37%) to cure/control, and 11 (19%) to the degree of coherence. Emotional representations were identified in six (10%) participants' presentations. Conclusion Leventhal's CS-SRM accounts for a large proportion of initial presentations to health services. Most people offer identity plus at least one additional component of illness representation. It may be necessary for clinicians to prompt remaining components to obtain a comprehensive understanding of patients' representations of illness.

AB - Background How people present symptoms to health services may influence the care they subsequently receive. Leventhal's Commonsense Model of Self-Regulation (CS-SRM) posits that individuals develop cognitive illness representations elaborated around five main components (identity, timeline, cause, consequences, and cure/control), coherence, and emotional representations. Aim To examine whether initial presentations to health services consist of the components of illness representation proposed by the CS-SRM. Design and setting A CS-SRM-based content analysis of calls to the Scottish national telephone advice service, NHS 24. Method A random sample of callers to NHS 24 was identified. A quota sample of 60 consented to participate. Their consultations were transcribed verbatim. Responses to an initial open question regarding the reason for calling were identified and divided into `meaning units'. A coding schedule was developed using Leventhal's definitions of illness representations. Meaning units were coded independently by two researchers. Results Fifty-nine eligible initial presentations contained between 1 and 13 coding units, (mean = 4). A total of 230 coding units were available for coding. Overall, 202 (88%) coding units were coded to at least one component of illness representation. All 59 (100%) participants made reference to identity, 26 (44%) to timeline, nine (15%) to cause, eight (14%) to consequences, 22 (37%) to cure/control, and 11 (19%) to the degree of coherence. Emotional representations were identified in six (10%) participants' presentations. Conclusion Leventhal's CS-SRM accounts for a large proportion of initial presentations to health services. Most people offer identity plus at least one additional component of illness representation. It may be necessary for clinicians to prompt remaining components to obtain a comprehensive understanding of patients' representations of illness.

KW - consultation

KW - symptoms

KW - telephone triage

U2 - 10.3399/bjgp11X567090

DO - 10.3399/bjgp11X567090

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 267

EP - 273

JO - The British Journal of General Practice

JF - The British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 585

ER -