How unconscious is subliminal perception?

Morten Overgaard, Bert Timmermans

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Ever since the concept of the “unconscious” defragmented one of the last nuclei of certitude in the western world, one of the great mysteries that common knowledge has come to associate with psychology is the idea that much of what goes on in our lives occurs outside of awareness. In other words, what we experience is but the tip of the iceberg: massive amounts of information are processed, have an influence on our behaviour, all the while going unnoticed. But is this the case? It seems indeed that we are not always able to retrace the associative causal chains that lead to a thought or action (though the degree to which this is the case is still being debated) - but according to the way we consciously experience the world, it seems to be both immediate and complete to us. Apart from the fact that we may not be able to perceive the entirety of the external world due to information processing limitations inherent to our physical system, what seems more unsettling is that we may not even be able to experience all that we perceive! Is there some limitation of our own internal system that keeps not only the world, but the way this world is represented in us fundamentally unknowable to ourselves?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science
EditorsShaun Gallagher, Daniel Schmicking
Place of PublicationNetherlands
PublisherSpringer
Pages501-518
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)978-90-481-2646-0
ISBN (Print)978-90-481-2645-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Subliminal Perception
Information Processing
Psychology
Associative
Nucleus
Thought
External World
Certitude
Causal
Common Knowledge
Physical
Mystery

Cite this

Overgaard, M., & Timmermans, B. (2010). How unconscious is subliminal perception? In S. Gallagher, & D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science (pp. 501-518). Netherlands: Springer . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_26

How unconscious is subliminal perception? / Overgaard, Morten; Timmermans, Bert.

Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. ed. / Shaun Gallagher; Daniel Schmicking. Netherlands : Springer , 2010. p. 501-518.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Overgaard, M & Timmermans, B 2010, How unconscious is subliminal perception? in S Gallagher & D Schmicking (eds), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Springer , Netherlands, pp. 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_26
Overgaard M, Timmermans B. How unconscious is subliminal perception? In Gallagher S, Schmicking D, editors, Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Netherlands: Springer . 2010. p. 501-518 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_26
Overgaard, Morten ; Timmermans, Bert. / How unconscious is subliminal perception?. Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. editor / Shaun Gallagher ; Daniel Schmicking. Netherlands : Springer , 2010. pp. 501-518
@inbook{3ac1b424246945e0a5a3512e2a32cf35,
title = "How unconscious is subliminal perception?",
abstract = "Ever since the concept of the “unconscious” defragmented one of the last nuclei of certitude in the western world, one of the great mysteries that common knowledge has come to associate with psychology is the idea that much of what goes on in our lives occurs outside of awareness. In other words, what we experience is but the tip of the iceberg: massive amounts of information are processed, have an influence on our behaviour, all the while going unnoticed. But is this the case? It seems indeed that we are not always able to retrace the associative causal chains that lead to a thought or action (though the degree to which this is the case is still being debated) - but according to the way we consciously experience the world, it seems to be both immediate and complete to us. Apart from the fact that we may not be able to perceive the entirety of the external world due to information processing limitations inherent to our physical system, what seems more unsettling is that we may not even be able to experience all that we perceive! Is there some limitation of our own internal system that keeps not only the world, but the way this world is represented in us fundamentally unknowable to ourselves?",
author = "Morten Overgaard and Bert Timmermans",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_26",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-90-481-2645-3",
pages = "501--518",
editor = "Shaun Gallagher and Daniel Schmicking",
booktitle = "Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science",
publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - How unconscious is subliminal perception?

AU - Overgaard, Morten

AU - Timmermans, Bert

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - Ever since the concept of the “unconscious” defragmented one of the last nuclei of certitude in the western world, one of the great mysteries that common knowledge has come to associate with psychology is the idea that much of what goes on in our lives occurs outside of awareness. In other words, what we experience is but the tip of the iceberg: massive amounts of information are processed, have an influence on our behaviour, all the while going unnoticed. But is this the case? It seems indeed that we are not always able to retrace the associative causal chains that lead to a thought or action (though the degree to which this is the case is still being debated) - but according to the way we consciously experience the world, it seems to be both immediate and complete to us. Apart from the fact that we may not be able to perceive the entirety of the external world due to information processing limitations inherent to our physical system, what seems more unsettling is that we may not even be able to experience all that we perceive! Is there some limitation of our own internal system that keeps not only the world, but the way this world is represented in us fundamentally unknowable to ourselves?

AB - Ever since the concept of the “unconscious” defragmented one of the last nuclei of certitude in the western world, one of the great mysteries that common knowledge has come to associate with psychology is the idea that much of what goes on in our lives occurs outside of awareness. In other words, what we experience is but the tip of the iceberg: massive amounts of information are processed, have an influence on our behaviour, all the while going unnoticed. But is this the case? It seems indeed that we are not always able to retrace the associative causal chains that lead to a thought or action (though the degree to which this is the case is still being debated) - but according to the way we consciously experience the world, it seems to be both immediate and complete to us. Apart from the fact that we may not be able to perceive the entirety of the external world due to information processing limitations inherent to our physical system, what seems more unsettling is that we may not even be able to experience all that we perceive! Is there some limitation of our own internal system that keeps not only the world, but the way this world is represented in us fundamentally unknowable to ourselves?

U2 - 10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_26

DO - 10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_26

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-90-481-2645-3

SP - 501

EP - 518

BT - Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science

A2 - Gallagher, Shaun

A2 - Schmicking, Daniel

PB - Springer

CY - Netherlands

ER -