Human rights, limited competence and limited partnerships

Salvesen v Riddell

Malcolm MacDonald Combe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Discusses the significance of the Inner House decision in Salvesen v Riddell on whether the provisions of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 s.72, dealing with protections for tenants in limited partnership arrangements, breached an agricultural landlord's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 and was not within the competence of the Scottish Parliament.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-200
Number of pages8
JournalScots Law Times
Volume32
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

limited partnership
ECHR
landlord
parliament
human rights
act

Keywords

  • Competence
  • Human rights
  • Landlords' rights
  • Limited partnerships
  • Scotland
  • Scottish Parliament
  • Tenancies

Cite this

Human rights, limited competence and limited partnerships : Salvesen v Riddell. / Combe, Malcolm MacDonald.

In: Scots Law Times, Vol. 32, 2012, p. 193-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Combe, Malcolm MacDonald. / Human rights, limited competence and limited partnerships : Salvesen v Riddell. In: Scots Law Times. 2012 ; Vol. 32. pp. 193-200.
@article{95fc13dfea8145e299421a0521259194,
title = "Human rights, limited competence and limited partnerships: Salvesen v Riddell",
abstract = "Discusses the significance of the Inner House decision in Salvesen v Riddell on whether the provisions of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 s.72, dealing with protections for tenants in limited partnership arrangements, breached an agricultural landlord's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 and was not within the competence of the Scottish Parliament.",
keywords = "Competence, Human rights, Landlords' rights, Limited partnerships, Scotland, Scottish Parliament, Tenancies",
author = "Combe, {Malcolm MacDonald}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "193--200",
journal = "Scots Law Times",
issn = "0036-908X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human rights, limited competence and limited partnerships

T2 - Salvesen v Riddell

AU - Combe, Malcolm MacDonald

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Discusses the significance of the Inner House decision in Salvesen v Riddell on whether the provisions of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 s.72, dealing with protections for tenants in limited partnership arrangements, breached an agricultural landlord's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 and was not within the competence of the Scottish Parliament.

AB - Discusses the significance of the Inner House decision in Salvesen v Riddell on whether the provisions of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 s.72, dealing with protections for tenants in limited partnership arrangements, breached an agricultural landlord's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 and was not within the competence of the Scottish Parliament.

KW - Competence

KW - Human rights

KW - Landlords' rights

KW - Limited partnerships

KW - Scotland

KW - Scottish Parliament

KW - Tenancies

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 193

EP - 200

JO - Scots Law Times

JF - Scots Law Times

SN - 0036-908X

ER -