Human rights, limited competence and limited partnerships: Salvesen v Riddell

Malcolm MacDonald Combe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Discusses the significance of the Inner House decision in Salvesen v Riddell on whether the provisions of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 s.72, dealing with protections for tenants in limited partnership arrangements, breached an agricultural landlord's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 and was not within the competence of the Scottish Parliament.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)193-200
Number of pages8
JournalScots Law Times
Volume32
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Competence
  • Human rights
  • Landlords' rights
  • Limited partnerships
  • Scotland
  • Scottish Parliament
  • Tenancies

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Human rights, limited competence and limited partnerships: Salvesen v Riddell'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this