Hunted predators: Intrinsic value—Response

Rosie Woodroffe, Stephen M. Redpath

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Our Perspective highlighted the need to base predator management on scientific evidence that is not only technically sound, but also accepted by stakeholders. M. Delibes-Mateos et al. argue that social acceptability alone is insufficient to justify control efforts. We entirely agree. As we explained in our Perspective, controlling populations of predators (and, by extension, other species with strong ecological interactions) can have unintended ecological consequences. Hence, decisions about control efforts should be informed by evidence of the likely impacts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1295
Number of pages1
JournalScience
Volume349
Issue number6254
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hunted predators: Intrinsic value—Response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this