Hunted predators

Intrinsic value—Response

Rosie Woodroffe, Stephen M. Redpath

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Our Perspective highlighted the need to base predator management on scientific evidence that is not only technically sound, but also accepted by stakeholders. M. Delibes-Mateos et al. argue that social acceptability alone is insufficient to justify control efforts. We entirely agree. As we explained in our Perspective, controlling populations of predators (and, by extension, other species with strong ecological interactions) can have unintended ecological consequences. Hence, decisions about control efforts should be informed by evidence of the likely impacts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1295
Number of pages1
JournalScience
Volume349
Issue number6254
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hunted predators : Intrinsic value—Response. / Woodroffe, Rosie; Redpath, Stephen M.

In: Science, Vol. 349, No. 6254, 18.09.2015, p. 1295.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Woodroffe, Rosie ; Redpath, Stephen M. / Hunted predators : Intrinsic value—Response. In: Science. 2015 ; Vol. 349, No. 6254. pp. 1295.
@article{c956a9c264bb48f7b6db4fd3ec781fe4,
title = "Hunted predators: Intrinsic value—Response",
abstract = "Our Perspective highlighted the need to base predator management on scientific evidence that is not only technically sound, but also accepted by stakeholders. M. Delibes-Mateos et al. argue that social acceptability alone is insufficient to justify control efforts. We entirely agree. As we explained in our Perspective, controlling populations of predators (and, by extension, other species with strong ecological interactions) can have unintended ecological consequences. Hence, decisions about control efforts should be informed by evidence of the likely impacts.",
author = "Rosie Woodroffe and Redpath, {Stephen M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1126/science.349.6254.1295",
language = "English",
volume = "349",
pages = "1295",
journal = "Science",
issn = "0036-8075",
publisher = "AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE",
number = "6254",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hunted predators

T2 - Intrinsic value—Response

AU - Woodroffe, Rosie

AU - Redpath, Stephen M.

PY - 2015/9/18

Y1 - 2015/9/18

N2 - Our Perspective highlighted the need to base predator management on scientific evidence that is not only technically sound, but also accepted by stakeholders. M. Delibes-Mateos et al. argue that social acceptability alone is insufficient to justify control efforts. We entirely agree. As we explained in our Perspective, controlling populations of predators (and, by extension, other species with strong ecological interactions) can have unintended ecological consequences. Hence, decisions about control efforts should be informed by evidence of the likely impacts.

AB - Our Perspective highlighted the need to base predator management on scientific evidence that is not only technically sound, but also accepted by stakeholders. M. Delibes-Mateos et al. argue that social acceptability alone is insufficient to justify control efforts. We entirely agree. As we explained in our Perspective, controlling populations of predators (and, by extension, other species with strong ecological interactions) can have unintended ecological consequences. Hence, decisions about control efforts should be informed by evidence of the likely impacts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941966252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1126/science.349.6254.1295

DO - 10.1126/science.349.6254.1295

M3 - Letter

VL - 349

SP - 1295

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6254

ER -