Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility

Nishat Babu*, Kenneth De Roeck, Nicolas Raineri

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    47 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The implications of corporate hypocrisy for corporate social responsibility (CSR) at the employee level of analysis remain largely unexplored. Drawing on attribution theory and the sensemaking perspective of CSR, we develop a model that highlights the negative effects of corporate hypocrisy on employees' voluntary contribution to their firm's social responsibility program (employee social responsibility, or ESR), as mediated by symbolic CSR attributions. Moreover, by incorporating the CSR sensitivity framework, we develop a more nuanced model that acknowledges the role of task significance in strengthening the aforementioned relationship. The results from our cross-lagged study first suggest that corporate hypocrisy negatively affects ESR through the intermediary role of symbolic CSR attributions. Second, the findings reveal that task significance moderates the relationship between corporate hypocrisy and ESR, such that both the direct and indirect effects are stronger for employees whose jobs are higher in task significance. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)376-384
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Business Research
    Volume114
    Early online date15 Aug 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

    Bibliographical note

    Funding
    This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

    Keywords

    • Attribution theory
    • Corporate hypocrisy
    • Employee social responsibility
    • Sensemaking
    • Symbolic CSR
    • Task significance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this