‘I knew before I was told’: Breaches, cues and clues in the diagnostic assemblage

Louise Locock, Sarah Nettleton, Susan Kirkpatrick, Sara Ryan, Sue Ziebland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diagnosis can be both a 'diagnostic moment', but also a process over time. This paper uses secondary analysis of narrative interviews on ovarian cancer, antenatal screening and motor neurone disease to explore how people relate assembling procedural, spatial and interactional evidence before the formal diagnostic moment. We offer the idea of a diagnostic assemblage to capture the ways in which individuals connect to and re-order signs and events that come to be associated with their bodies. Building on the empirical work of Poole and Lyne (2000) in the field of breast cancer diagnosis, we identify how patients describe being alerted to their diagnosis, either through 'clues' they report picking up (often inadvertently) or through 'cues', perceived as a more intentional prompt given by a health professional, or an organisational process. For patients, these clues frequently represent a breach in the expected order of their encounter with healthcare. Even seemingly mundane episodes or behaviours take on meanings which health professionals may not themselves anticipate. Our findings speak to an emergent body of work demonstrating that experiences of formal healthcare during the lead-up to diagnosis shape patients' expectations, degree of trust in professionals, and even health outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-92
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume154
Early online date26 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Cues
diagnostic
health professionals
Health
cancer
Delivery of Health Care
narrative interview
Motor Neuron Disease
secondary analysis
Prenatal Diagnosis
Early Detection of Cancer
Ovarian Neoplasms
Interviews
Breast Neoplasms
Disease
Diagnostics
Assemblages
event
health
evidence

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • patient experience
  • qualitative research
  • narrative
  • secondary analysis

Cite this

‘I knew before I was told’ : Breaches, cues and clues in the diagnostic assemblage. / Locock, Louise; Nettleton, Sarah; Kirkpatrick, Susan; Ryan, Sara; Ziebland, Sue.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 154, 01.04.2016, p. 85-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Locock, Louise ; Nettleton, Sarah ; Kirkpatrick, Susan ; Ryan, Sara ; Ziebland, Sue. / ‘I knew before I was told’ : Breaches, cues and clues in the diagnostic assemblage. In: Social Science & Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 154. pp. 85-92.
@article{16ef040f821c4629b88a604ca4bd0aac,
title = "‘I knew before I was told’: Breaches, cues and clues in the diagnostic assemblage",
abstract = "Diagnosis can be both a 'diagnostic moment', but also a process over time. This paper uses secondary analysis of narrative interviews on ovarian cancer, antenatal screening and motor neurone disease to explore how people relate assembling procedural, spatial and interactional evidence before the formal diagnostic moment. We offer the idea of a diagnostic assemblage to capture the ways in which individuals connect to and re-order signs and events that come to be associated with their bodies. Building on the empirical work of Poole and Lyne (2000) in the field of breast cancer diagnosis, we identify how patients describe being alerted to their diagnosis, either through 'clues' they report picking up (often inadvertently) or through 'cues', perceived as a more intentional prompt given by a health professional, or an organisational process. For patients, these clues frequently represent a breach in the expected order of their encounter with healthcare. Even seemingly mundane episodes or behaviours take on meanings which health professionals may not themselves anticipate. Our findings speak to an emergent body of work demonstrating that experiences of formal healthcare during the lead-up to diagnosis shape patients' expectations, degree of trust in professionals, and even health outcomes.",
keywords = "diagnosis, patient experience, qualitative research, narrative, secondary analysis",
author = "Louise Locock and Sarah Nettleton and Susan Kirkpatrick and Sara Ryan and Sue Ziebland",
note = "Acknowledgements: with thanks to A{\'i}ne Kelly, for organising the original workshop hosted at Green Templeton College, Oxford, from which this paper emerged; to all the other workshop participants; to Julie Evans who conducted the ovarian cancer interviews; and to all the people who took part in an interview about their health and illness experiences. We are also grateful for comments from our anonymous peer reviews which considerably strengthened the paper. Funding for the original datasets used came from: the Motor Neurone Disease Association and the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation programme [08/1610/123]; the NHS National Screening Programme; and Cancer Research UK [C7663/A2903]. Louise Locock is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and is a theme lead on the NIHR Oxford Diagnostic Evidence Cooperative. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.037",
language = "English",
volume = "154",
pages = "85--92",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘I knew before I was told’

T2 - Breaches, cues and clues in the diagnostic assemblage

AU - Locock, Louise

AU - Nettleton, Sarah

AU - Kirkpatrick, Susan

AU - Ryan, Sara

AU - Ziebland, Sue

N1 - Acknowledgements: with thanks to Aíne Kelly, for organising the original workshop hosted at Green Templeton College, Oxford, from which this paper emerged; to all the other workshop participants; to Julie Evans who conducted the ovarian cancer interviews; and to all the people who took part in an interview about their health and illness experiences. We are also grateful for comments from our anonymous peer reviews which considerably strengthened the paper. Funding for the original datasets used came from: the Motor Neurone Disease Association and the National Institute for Health Research Service Delivery and Organisation programme [08/1610/123]; the NHS National Screening Programme; and Cancer Research UK [C7663/A2903]. Louise Locock is supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and is a theme lead on the NIHR Oxford Diagnostic Evidence Cooperative. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Diagnosis can be both a 'diagnostic moment', but also a process over time. This paper uses secondary analysis of narrative interviews on ovarian cancer, antenatal screening and motor neurone disease to explore how people relate assembling procedural, spatial and interactional evidence before the formal diagnostic moment. We offer the idea of a diagnostic assemblage to capture the ways in which individuals connect to and re-order signs and events that come to be associated with their bodies. Building on the empirical work of Poole and Lyne (2000) in the field of breast cancer diagnosis, we identify how patients describe being alerted to their diagnosis, either through 'clues' they report picking up (often inadvertently) or through 'cues', perceived as a more intentional prompt given by a health professional, or an organisational process. For patients, these clues frequently represent a breach in the expected order of their encounter with healthcare. Even seemingly mundane episodes or behaviours take on meanings which health professionals may not themselves anticipate. Our findings speak to an emergent body of work demonstrating that experiences of formal healthcare during the lead-up to diagnosis shape patients' expectations, degree of trust in professionals, and even health outcomes.

AB - Diagnosis can be both a 'diagnostic moment', but also a process over time. This paper uses secondary analysis of narrative interviews on ovarian cancer, antenatal screening and motor neurone disease to explore how people relate assembling procedural, spatial and interactional evidence before the formal diagnostic moment. We offer the idea of a diagnostic assemblage to capture the ways in which individuals connect to and re-order signs and events that come to be associated with their bodies. Building on the empirical work of Poole and Lyne (2000) in the field of breast cancer diagnosis, we identify how patients describe being alerted to their diagnosis, either through 'clues' they report picking up (often inadvertently) or through 'cues', perceived as a more intentional prompt given by a health professional, or an organisational process. For patients, these clues frequently represent a breach in the expected order of their encounter with healthcare. Even seemingly mundane episodes or behaviours take on meanings which health professionals may not themselves anticipate. Our findings speak to an emergent body of work demonstrating that experiences of formal healthcare during the lead-up to diagnosis shape patients' expectations, degree of trust in professionals, and even health outcomes.

KW - diagnosis

KW - patient experience

KW - qualitative research

KW - narrative

KW - secondary analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.037

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.037

M3 - Article

VL - 154

SP - 85

EP - 92

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -