Identification of Stage-Specific Breast Markers Using Quantitative Proteomics

Sadr-ul Shaheed, Nitin Rustogi, Andrew Scally, Julie Wilson, Helene Thygesen, Maria A. Loizidou, Andreas Hadjisavvas, Andrew Hanby, Valerie Speirs, Paul Loadman, Richard Linforth, Kyriacos Kyriacou, Chris W. Sutton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Matched healthy and diseased tissues from breast cancer patients were analyzed by quantitative proteomics. By comparing proteomic profiles of fibroadenoma (benign tumors, three patients), DCIS (noninvasive cancer, three patients), and invasive ductal carcinoma (four patients), we identified protein alterations that correlated with breast cancer progression. Three 8-plex iTRAQ experiments generated an average of 826 protein identifications, of which 402 were common. After excluding those originating from blood, 59 proteins were significantly changed in tumor compared with normal tissues, with the majority associated with invasive carcinomas. Bioinformatics analysis identified relationships between proteins in this subset including roles in redox regulation, lipid transport, protein folding, and proteasomal degradation, with a substantial number increased in expression due to Myc oncogene activation. Three target proteins, cofilin-1 and p23 (increased in invasive carcinoma) and membrane copper amine oxidase 3 (decreased in invasive carcinoma), were subjected to further validation. All three were observed in phenotype-specific breast cancer cell lines, normal (nontransformed) breast cell lines, and primary breast epithelial cells by Western blotting, but only cofilin-1 and p23 were detected by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry analysis. All three proteins were detected by both analytical approaches in matched tissue biopsies emulating the response observed with proteomics analysis. Tissue microarray analysis (361 patients) indicated cofilin-1 staining positively correlating with tumor grade and p23 staining with ER positive status; both therefore merit further investigation as potential biomarkers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5696-5708
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Proteome Research
Volume12
Issue number12
Early online date9 Oct 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

We thank the Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation (grants 0406/10, 0609/04, and 0311/07), Europa Donna Cyprus, and MarfinLaiki Bank for supporting this research, Yorkshire Cancer Research for the support of S.-ul S., C.S., P.L., A.H., and V.S. (BPP049 and B209PG). We are grateful to Dr. Pauline Carder, pathologist; Dr. V. Makris, general surgeon; Dr. C. Oxynou and Dr. I. Zouvani, histopathologists; Dr. Y. Markou, medical oncologist; and Dr. M. Daniel, radiation oncologist for their expertise and for helping with patient recruitment. We also thank the patients for their participation and without whom this work would not be possible. Thanks to Mike Shires at the Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology for preparation and analysis of TMA samples.

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • DCIS
  • fibroadenoma
  • invasive carcinoma
  • iTRAQ
  • mass spectrometry
  • proteomics
  • tissue microarray
  • Western blotting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of Stage-Specific Breast Markers Using Quantitative Proteomics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this