Identifying the Performance Criteria for Appraisal of Colposcopists: Benchmarking Delphi

S Thangaratinam (Corresponding Author), P W Walker, T Freeman-Wang, D Luesley, Margaret Eleanor Cruickshank, C Redman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background Colposcopy forms an essential part of National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). With an increased emphasis on accountability and improved performance, there is a need to identify the performance criteria that are essential to be satisfied by the colposcopists at the time of appraisal.

    Objective To identify the performance criteria essential for appraisal of colposcopists by two-generational Delphi survey.

    Design Delphi survey.

    Setting Annual British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology conference (BSCCP 2005, Edinburgh, UK).

    Population Four hundred and ninety-nine delegates attending the above conference.

    Method A two-generational Delphi survey was undertaken to identify the criteria needed for appraisal. The participants were asked to rate the relevance of quality items that might be considered necessary for appraisal of performance of colposcopists. After the first round, the results were presented, and the respondents were given the chance to reflect on their response and change it if necessary.

    Main outcome measures Criteria considered to be essential for appraisal of colposcopists in areas of training, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects and communication.

    Results In the first round, 306/499 (61%) participants returned the completed questionnaire. Sixty percent (187/306) of participants returned their questionnaire in the second round. In addition to BSCCP certification, four other criteria were identified, which were quality of recorded findings, biopsy rate when atypia noted, proportion of biopsies histologically adequate and proportion of normal initial posttreatment follow-up smears.

    Conclusion This Delphi survey has been the first to identify criteria to be used in the annual appraisal of professionals. It has resulted in a number of criteria that could be considered for the appraisal and possible revalidation of colposcopists practising in UK.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1288-1291
    Number of pages3
    JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
    Volume114
    Issue number10
    Early online date12 Sep 2007
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

    Fingerprint

    Benchmarking
    Biopsy
    Colposcopy
    Social Responsibility
    Certification
    National Health Programs
    Surveys and Questionnaires
    Communication
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Population

    Keywords

    • colposcopy
    • benchmarking

    Cite this

    Identifying the Performance Criteria for Appraisal of Colposcopists : Benchmarking Delphi. / Thangaratinam, S (Corresponding Author); Walker, P W; Freeman-Wang, T; Luesley, D; Cruickshank, Margaret Eleanor; Redman, C.

    In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 114, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 1288-1291.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Thangaratinam, S ; Walker, P W ; Freeman-Wang, T ; Luesley, D ; Cruickshank, Margaret Eleanor ; Redman, C. / Identifying the Performance Criteria for Appraisal of Colposcopists : Benchmarking Delphi. In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2007 ; Vol. 114, No. 10. pp. 1288-1291.
    @article{5cf6ec11273d4e7c842d1877831eae80,
    title = "Identifying the Performance Criteria for Appraisal of Colposcopists: Benchmarking Delphi",
    abstract = "Background Colposcopy forms an essential part of National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). With an increased emphasis on accountability and improved performance, there is a need to identify the performance criteria that are essential to be satisfied by the colposcopists at the time of appraisal. Objective To identify the performance criteria essential for appraisal of colposcopists by two-generational Delphi survey. Design Delphi survey. Setting Annual British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology conference (BSCCP 2005, Edinburgh, UK). Population Four hundred and ninety-nine delegates attending the above conference. Method A two-generational Delphi survey was undertaken to identify the criteria needed for appraisal. The participants were asked to rate the relevance of quality items that might be considered necessary for appraisal of performance of colposcopists. After the first round, the results were presented, and the respondents were given the chance to reflect on their response and change it if necessary. Main outcome measures Criteria considered to be essential for appraisal of colposcopists in areas of training, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects and communication. Results In the first round, 306/499 (61{\%}) participants returned the completed questionnaire. Sixty percent (187/306) of participants returned their questionnaire in the second round. In addition to BSCCP certification, four other criteria were identified, which were quality of recorded findings, biopsy rate when atypia noted, proportion of biopsies histologically adequate and proportion of normal initial posttreatment follow-up smears. Conclusion This Delphi survey has been the first to identify criteria to be used in the annual appraisal of professionals. It has resulted in a number of criteria that could be considered for the appraisal and possible revalidation of colposcopists practising in UK.",
    keywords = "colposcopy, benchmarking",
    author = "S Thangaratinam and Walker, {P W} and T Freeman-Wang and D Luesley and Cruickshank, {Margaret Eleanor} and C Redman",
    year = "2007",
    month = "10",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01442.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "114",
    pages = "1288--1291",
    journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
    issn = "1470-0328",
    publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
    number = "10",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Identifying the Performance Criteria for Appraisal of Colposcopists

    T2 - Benchmarking Delphi

    AU - Thangaratinam, S

    AU - Walker, P W

    AU - Freeman-Wang, T

    AU - Luesley, D

    AU - Cruickshank, Margaret Eleanor

    AU - Redman, C

    PY - 2007/10

    Y1 - 2007/10

    N2 - Background Colposcopy forms an essential part of National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). With an increased emphasis on accountability and improved performance, there is a need to identify the performance criteria that are essential to be satisfied by the colposcopists at the time of appraisal. Objective To identify the performance criteria essential for appraisal of colposcopists by two-generational Delphi survey. Design Delphi survey. Setting Annual British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology conference (BSCCP 2005, Edinburgh, UK). Population Four hundred and ninety-nine delegates attending the above conference. Method A two-generational Delphi survey was undertaken to identify the criteria needed for appraisal. The participants were asked to rate the relevance of quality items that might be considered necessary for appraisal of performance of colposcopists. After the first round, the results were presented, and the respondents were given the chance to reflect on their response and change it if necessary. Main outcome measures Criteria considered to be essential for appraisal of colposcopists in areas of training, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects and communication. Results In the first round, 306/499 (61%) participants returned the completed questionnaire. Sixty percent (187/306) of participants returned their questionnaire in the second round. In addition to BSCCP certification, four other criteria were identified, which were quality of recorded findings, biopsy rate when atypia noted, proportion of biopsies histologically adequate and proportion of normal initial posttreatment follow-up smears. Conclusion This Delphi survey has been the first to identify criteria to be used in the annual appraisal of professionals. It has resulted in a number of criteria that could be considered for the appraisal and possible revalidation of colposcopists practising in UK.

    AB - Background Colposcopy forms an essential part of National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). With an increased emphasis on accountability and improved performance, there is a need to identify the performance criteria that are essential to be satisfied by the colposcopists at the time of appraisal. Objective To identify the performance criteria essential for appraisal of colposcopists by two-generational Delphi survey. Design Delphi survey. Setting Annual British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology conference (BSCCP 2005, Edinburgh, UK). Population Four hundred and ninety-nine delegates attending the above conference. Method A two-generational Delphi survey was undertaken to identify the criteria needed for appraisal. The participants were asked to rate the relevance of quality items that might be considered necessary for appraisal of performance of colposcopists. After the first round, the results were presented, and the respondents were given the chance to reflect on their response and change it if necessary. Main outcome measures Criteria considered to be essential for appraisal of colposcopists in areas of training, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects and communication. Results In the first round, 306/499 (61%) participants returned the completed questionnaire. Sixty percent (187/306) of participants returned their questionnaire in the second round. In addition to BSCCP certification, four other criteria were identified, which were quality of recorded findings, biopsy rate when atypia noted, proportion of biopsies histologically adequate and proportion of normal initial posttreatment follow-up smears. Conclusion This Delphi survey has been the first to identify criteria to be used in the annual appraisal of professionals. It has resulted in a number of criteria that could be considered for the appraisal and possible revalidation of colposcopists practising in UK.

    KW - colposcopy

    KW - benchmarking

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01442.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01442.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 114

    SP - 1288

    EP - 1291

    JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    SN - 1470-0328

    IS - 10

    ER -