Identifying the selective pressures underlying offspring sex-ratio adjustments: a case study in a wild seabird

Thomas Merkling, Jorg Welcker, A. J. Mark Hewison, Scott A. Hatch, Alexander S. Kitaysky, John R. Speakman, Etienne Danchin, Pierrick Blanchard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sex allocation theory predicts that parents should bias offspring sex according to the costs and benefits associated with producing either sex in a given context. Accurately interpreting sex-ratio biases, therefore, requires a precise identification of these selective pressures. However, such information is generally lacking. This may partly explain the inconsistency in reported sex allocation patterns, especially in vertebrates. We present data from a long-term feeding experiment in black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) that allowed us to increase investment capacity for some breeding pairs. Previous findings showed that these pairs then overproduced sons compared with control parents. Here, our aim was to test the underlying assumptions of the 2 appropriate sex allocation models for our context: the "cost of reproduction hypothesis" and the "Trivers-Willard hypothesis." The former assumes a sex difference in rearing costs, whereas the latter assumes a difference in fitness returns. 1) Independent of feeding treatment, rearing sons was energetically more demanding for parents (as revealed by higher energy expenditure and higher baseline corticosterone levels) than rearing daughters, thereby corroborating the underlying assumption of the "cost of reproduction hypothesis." 2) Evidence supporting the assumptions of the "Trivers-Willard hypothesis" was less convincing. Overall, our results suggest that drivers of parental sex allocation decisions are probably more related to offspring sex-specific energetic costs than to their future reproductive success in our study species. Assessing the adaptive value of sex-ratio biases requires precise investigation of the assumptions underlying theoretical models, particularly as long as the mechanisms involved in sex-ratio manipulation remain largely unknown.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)916-925
Number of pages10
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Volume26
Issue number3
Early online date5 Apr 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

Keywords

  • corticosterone
  • cost of reproduction hypothesis
  • daily energy expenditure
  • investment capacity
  • Trivers-Willard hypothesis
  • black-legged kittiwakes
  • daily energy-expenditure
  • doubly labeled water
  • rissa-tridactyla
  • food availability
  • fitness consequences
  • population processes
  • Seychelles warblers
  • parental investment
  • maternal investment

Cite this

Merkling, T., Welcker, J., Hewison, A. J. M., Hatch, S. A., Kitaysky, A. S., Speakman, J. R., ... Blanchard, P. (2015). Identifying the selective pressures underlying offspring sex-ratio adjustments: a case study in a wild seabird. Behavioral Ecology, 26(3), 916-925. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv032

Identifying the selective pressures underlying offspring sex-ratio adjustments : a case study in a wild seabird. / Merkling, Thomas; Welcker, Jorg; Hewison, A. J. Mark; Hatch, Scott A.; Kitaysky, Alexander S.; Speakman, John R.; Danchin, Etienne; Blanchard, Pierrick.

In: Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 916-925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Merkling, T, Welcker, J, Hewison, AJM, Hatch, SA, Kitaysky, AS, Speakman, JR, Danchin, E & Blanchard, P 2015, 'Identifying the selective pressures underlying offspring sex-ratio adjustments: a case study in a wild seabird' Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 916-925. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv032
Merkling, Thomas ; Welcker, Jorg ; Hewison, A. J. Mark ; Hatch, Scott A. ; Kitaysky, Alexander S. ; Speakman, John R. ; Danchin, Etienne ; Blanchard, Pierrick. / Identifying the selective pressures underlying offspring sex-ratio adjustments : a case study in a wild seabird. In: Behavioral Ecology. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 916-925.
@article{3d9947a790f84f55804880c0a3637018,
title = "Identifying the selective pressures underlying offspring sex-ratio adjustments: a case study in a wild seabird",
abstract = "Sex allocation theory predicts that parents should bias offspring sex according to the costs and benefits associated with producing either sex in a given context. Accurately interpreting sex-ratio biases, therefore, requires a precise identification of these selective pressures. However, such information is generally lacking. This may partly explain the inconsistency in reported sex allocation patterns, especially in vertebrates. We present data from a long-term feeding experiment in black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) that allowed us to increase investment capacity for some breeding pairs. Previous findings showed that these pairs then overproduced sons compared with control parents. Here, our aim was to test the underlying assumptions of the 2 appropriate sex allocation models for our context: the {"}cost of reproduction hypothesis{"} and the {"}Trivers-Willard hypothesis.{"} The former assumes a sex difference in rearing costs, whereas the latter assumes a difference in fitness returns. 1) Independent of feeding treatment, rearing sons was energetically more demanding for parents (as revealed by higher energy expenditure and higher baseline corticosterone levels) than rearing daughters, thereby corroborating the underlying assumption of the {"}cost of reproduction hypothesis.{"} 2) Evidence supporting the assumptions of the {"}Trivers-Willard hypothesis{"} was less convincing. Overall, our results suggest that drivers of parental sex allocation decisions are probably more related to offspring sex-specific energetic costs than to their future reproductive success in our study species. Assessing the adaptive value of sex-ratio biases requires precise investigation of the assumptions underlying theoretical models, particularly as long as the mechanisms involved in sex-ratio manipulation remain largely unknown.",
keywords = "corticosterone, cost of reproduction hypothesis, daily energy expenditure, investment capacity, Trivers-Willard hypothesis, black-legged kittiwakes, daily energy-expenditure, doubly labeled water, rissa-tridactyla, food availability, fitness consequences, population processes, Seychelles warblers, parental investment, maternal investment",
author = "Thomas Merkling and Jorg Welcker and Hewison, {A. J. Mark} and Hatch, {Scott A.} and Kitaysky, {Alexander S.} and Speakman, {John R.} and Etienne Danchin and Pierrick Blanchard",
note = "FUNDING This work was supported by the North Pacific Research Board (Project No. 320, BEST-BSIERP Projects B74, B67, and B77 to A.S.K.), the Research Council of Norway (project 197192/V40 to J.W.), by a grant from the Institut Polaire Fran{\cc}ais Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV “Programme 1162 SexCoMonArc” to E.D. and P.B.), and by the French Laboratory of Excellence project “TULIP” (ANR-10-LABX-41; ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02).",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/beheco/arv032",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "916--925",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology",
issn = "1045-2249",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying the selective pressures underlying offspring sex-ratio adjustments

T2 - a case study in a wild seabird

AU - Merkling, Thomas

AU - Welcker, Jorg

AU - Hewison, A. J. Mark

AU - Hatch, Scott A.

AU - Kitaysky, Alexander S.

AU - Speakman, John R.

AU - Danchin, Etienne

AU - Blanchard, Pierrick

N1 - FUNDING This work was supported by the North Pacific Research Board (Project No. 320, BEST-BSIERP Projects B74, B67, and B77 to A.S.K.), the Research Council of Norway (project 197192/V40 to J.W.), by a grant from the Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV “Programme 1162 SexCoMonArc” to E.D. and P.B.), and by the French Laboratory of Excellence project “TULIP” (ANR-10-LABX-41; ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02).

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Sex allocation theory predicts that parents should bias offspring sex according to the costs and benefits associated with producing either sex in a given context. Accurately interpreting sex-ratio biases, therefore, requires a precise identification of these selective pressures. However, such information is generally lacking. This may partly explain the inconsistency in reported sex allocation patterns, especially in vertebrates. We present data from a long-term feeding experiment in black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) that allowed us to increase investment capacity for some breeding pairs. Previous findings showed that these pairs then overproduced sons compared with control parents. Here, our aim was to test the underlying assumptions of the 2 appropriate sex allocation models for our context: the "cost of reproduction hypothesis" and the "Trivers-Willard hypothesis." The former assumes a sex difference in rearing costs, whereas the latter assumes a difference in fitness returns. 1) Independent of feeding treatment, rearing sons was energetically more demanding for parents (as revealed by higher energy expenditure and higher baseline corticosterone levels) than rearing daughters, thereby corroborating the underlying assumption of the "cost of reproduction hypothesis." 2) Evidence supporting the assumptions of the "Trivers-Willard hypothesis" was less convincing. Overall, our results suggest that drivers of parental sex allocation decisions are probably more related to offspring sex-specific energetic costs than to their future reproductive success in our study species. Assessing the adaptive value of sex-ratio biases requires precise investigation of the assumptions underlying theoretical models, particularly as long as the mechanisms involved in sex-ratio manipulation remain largely unknown.

AB - Sex allocation theory predicts that parents should bias offspring sex according to the costs and benefits associated with producing either sex in a given context. Accurately interpreting sex-ratio biases, therefore, requires a precise identification of these selective pressures. However, such information is generally lacking. This may partly explain the inconsistency in reported sex allocation patterns, especially in vertebrates. We present data from a long-term feeding experiment in black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) that allowed us to increase investment capacity for some breeding pairs. Previous findings showed that these pairs then overproduced sons compared with control parents. Here, our aim was to test the underlying assumptions of the 2 appropriate sex allocation models for our context: the "cost of reproduction hypothesis" and the "Trivers-Willard hypothesis." The former assumes a sex difference in rearing costs, whereas the latter assumes a difference in fitness returns. 1) Independent of feeding treatment, rearing sons was energetically more demanding for parents (as revealed by higher energy expenditure and higher baseline corticosterone levels) than rearing daughters, thereby corroborating the underlying assumption of the "cost of reproduction hypothesis." 2) Evidence supporting the assumptions of the "Trivers-Willard hypothesis" was less convincing. Overall, our results suggest that drivers of parental sex allocation decisions are probably more related to offspring sex-specific energetic costs than to their future reproductive success in our study species. Assessing the adaptive value of sex-ratio biases requires precise investigation of the assumptions underlying theoretical models, particularly as long as the mechanisms involved in sex-ratio manipulation remain largely unknown.

KW - corticosterone

KW - cost of reproduction hypothesis

KW - daily energy expenditure

KW - investment capacity

KW - Trivers-Willard hypothesis

KW - black-legged kittiwakes

KW - daily energy-expenditure

KW - doubly labeled water

KW - rissa-tridactyla

KW - food availability

KW - fitness consequences

KW - population processes

KW - Seychelles warblers

KW - parental investment

KW - maternal investment

U2 - 10.1093/beheco/arv032

DO - 10.1093/beheco/arv032

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 916

EP - 925

JO - Behavioral Ecology

JF - Behavioral Ecology

SN - 1045-2249

IS - 3

ER -