Escherichia coli O157: Burger bug or environmental pathogen?

Norval James Colin Strachan, Geoffrey Martin Dunn, M. E. Locking, T. M. Reid, Iain D Ogden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The three main pathways of Escherichia coli O157 infection are foodborne, environmental (including direct contact with animals and their faeces and contaminated water supplies) or person to person contact. The disease is often nicknamed the 'burger bug' but it appears that environmental risk factors may be more important. In this study we use four techniques (outbreak analysis, case-control studies, disease mapping and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)) to determine whether burgers or environmental pathways present the greater risk in Scotland. Analysis of E. coli 0157 outbreaks in Scotland from 1994 to 2003 associated with either meat or dairy foods, or with environmental transmission shows that approximately 40% [M1] of these outbreaks were foodborne, 54% were environmental and 6% involved both transmission routes. However, the largest outbreaks tend to be foodborne accounting for 83% of outbreak cases. Case-control studies indicate strong risk associations with environmental exposure in Scotland, the UK as a whole and the USA, but burgers appear to be more of a risk in the USA. Canadian, Scottish and Swedish disease mapping studies found positive association with indicators of cattle density. In Grampian (North-East Scotland) we found that there was a positive association with cattle and sheep density (divided by human population density) as well as percentage of population on private water supplies. We found 63% of cases in rural postcodes compared with 37% urban after correcting for population differences suggesting that at least 26% of cases may be classified as environmental. QMRA showed that on average, the risk was 100 times greater when visiting a pasture than eating a burger in Grampian. However, it is difficult to determine which pathway actually causes most illnesses as it is unknown how many burgers are consumed daily and what is the frequency of human visits to pasture. The implementation of hygienic food processing post-1996 Central Scotland outbreak and the preference for 'well done' burgers may account for this food being a relatively low risk thus making the 'burger bug' term less appropriate in the UK. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-137
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Food Microbiology
Volume112
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • quantitative microbiological risk assessment
  • epidemiology
  • disease mapping
  • Escherichia coli O157
  • infectious diseases
  • environmental pathogens
  • foodborne pathogens
  • QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT
  • HEMOLYTIC-UREMIC-SYNDROME
  • SCOUT CAMP
  • INFECTION
  • OUTBREAK
  • SCOTLAND
  • CATTLE
  • HAMBURGERS
  • PREVALENCE
  • PREVENTION

Cite this

Escherichia coli O157: Burger bug or environmental pathogen? / Strachan, Norval James Colin; Dunn, Geoffrey Martin; Locking, M. E.; Reid, T. M.; Ogden, Iain D.

In: International Journal of Food Microbiology, Vol. 112, No. 2, 11.2006, p. 129-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{16d0dd0ae46c4e09a60e6857fadee1bc,
title = "Escherichia coli O157: Burger bug or environmental pathogen?",
abstract = "The three main pathways of Escherichia coli O157 infection are foodborne, environmental (including direct contact with animals and their faeces and contaminated water supplies) or person to person contact. The disease is often nicknamed the 'burger bug' but it appears that environmental risk factors may be more important. In this study we use four techniques (outbreak analysis, case-control studies, disease mapping and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)) to determine whether burgers or environmental pathways present the greater risk in Scotland. Analysis of E. coli 0157 outbreaks in Scotland from 1994 to 2003 associated with either meat or dairy foods, or with environmental transmission shows that approximately 40{\%} [M1] of these outbreaks were foodborne, 54{\%} were environmental and 6{\%} involved both transmission routes. However, the largest outbreaks tend to be foodborne accounting for 83{\%} of outbreak cases. Case-control studies indicate strong risk associations with environmental exposure in Scotland, the UK as a whole and the USA, but burgers appear to be more of a risk in the USA. Canadian, Scottish and Swedish disease mapping studies found positive association with indicators of cattle density. In Grampian (North-East Scotland) we found that there was a positive association with cattle and sheep density (divided by human population density) as well as percentage of population on private water supplies. We found 63{\%} of cases in rural postcodes compared with 37{\%} urban after correcting for population differences suggesting that at least 26{\%} of cases may be classified as environmental. QMRA showed that on average, the risk was 100 times greater when visiting a pasture than eating a burger in Grampian. However, it is difficult to determine which pathway actually causes most illnesses as it is unknown how many burgers are consumed daily and what is the frequency of human visits to pasture. The implementation of hygienic food processing post-1996 Central Scotland outbreak and the preference for 'well done' burgers may account for this food being a relatively low risk thus making the 'burger bug' term less appropriate in the UK. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "quantitative microbiological risk assessment, epidemiology, disease mapping, Escherichia coli O157, infectious diseases, environmental pathogens, foodborne pathogens, QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT, HEMOLYTIC-UREMIC-SYNDROME, SCOUT CAMP, INFECTION, OUTBREAK, SCOTLAND, CATTLE, HAMBURGERS, PREVALENCE, PREVENTION",
author = "Strachan, {Norval James Colin} and Dunn, {Geoffrey Martin} and Locking, {M. E.} and Reid, {T. M.} and Ogden, {Iain D}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.06.021",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "129--137",
journal = "International Journal of Food Microbiology",
issn = "0168-1605",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Escherichia coli O157: Burger bug or environmental pathogen?

AU - Strachan, Norval James Colin

AU - Dunn, Geoffrey Martin

AU - Locking, M. E.

AU - Reid, T. M.

AU - Ogden, Iain D

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - The three main pathways of Escherichia coli O157 infection are foodborne, environmental (including direct contact with animals and their faeces and contaminated water supplies) or person to person contact. The disease is often nicknamed the 'burger bug' but it appears that environmental risk factors may be more important. In this study we use four techniques (outbreak analysis, case-control studies, disease mapping and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)) to determine whether burgers or environmental pathways present the greater risk in Scotland. Analysis of E. coli 0157 outbreaks in Scotland from 1994 to 2003 associated with either meat or dairy foods, or with environmental transmission shows that approximately 40% [M1] of these outbreaks were foodborne, 54% were environmental and 6% involved both transmission routes. However, the largest outbreaks tend to be foodborne accounting for 83% of outbreak cases. Case-control studies indicate strong risk associations with environmental exposure in Scotland, the UK as a whole and the USA, but burgers appear to be more of a risk in the USA. Canadian, Scottish and Swedish disease mapping studies found positive association with indicators of cattle density. In Grampian (North-East Scotland) we found that there was a positive association with cattle and sheep density (divided by human population density) as well as percentage of population on private water supplies. We found 63% of cases in rural postcodes compared with 37% urban after correcting for population differences suggesting that at least 26% of cases may be classified as environmental. QMRA showed that on average, the risk was 100 times greater when visiting a pasture than eating a burger in Grampian. However, it is difficult to determine which pathway actually causes most illnesses as it is unknown how many burgers are consumed daily and what is the frequency of human visits to pasture. The implementation of hygienic food processing post-1996 Central Scotland outbreak and the preference for 'well done' burgers may account for this food being a relatively low risk thus making the 'burger bug' term less appropriate in the UK. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - The three main pathways of Escherichia coli O157 infection are foodborne, environmental (including direct contact with animals and their faeces and contaminated water supplies) or person to person contact. The disease is often nicknamed the 'burger bug' but it appears that environmental risk factors may be more important. In this study we use four techniques (outbreak analysis, case-control studies, disease mapping and quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)) to determine whether burgers or environmental pathways present the greater risk in Scotland. Analysis of E. coli 0157 outbreaks in Scotland from 1994 to 2003 associated with either meat or dairy foods, or with environmental transmission shows that approximately 40% [M1] of these outbreaks were foodborne, 54% were environmental and 6% involved both transmission routes. However, the largest outbreaks tend to be foodborne accounting for 83% of outbreak cases. Case-control studies indicate strong risk associations with environmental exposure in Scotland, the UK as a whole and the USA, but burgers appear to be more of a risk in the USA. Canadian, Scottish and Swedish disease mapping studies found positive association with indicators of cattle density. In Grampian (North-East Scotland) we found that there was a positive association with cattle and sheep density (divided by human population density) as well as percentage of population on private water supplies. We found 63% of cases in rural postcodes compared with 37% urban after correcting for population differences suggesting that at least 26% of cases may be classified as environmental. QMRA showed that on average, the risk was 100 times greater when visiting a pasture than eating a burger in Grampian. However, it is difficult to determine which pathway actually causes most illnesses as it is unknown how many burgers are consumed daily and what is the frequency of human visits to pasture. The implementation of hygienic food processing post-1996 Central Scotland outbreak and the preference for 'well done' burgers may account for this food being a relatively low risk thus making the 'burger bug' term less appropriate in the UK. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - quantitative microbiological risk assessment

KW - epidemiology

KW - disease mapping

KW - Escherichia coli O157

KW - infectious diseases

KW - environmental pathogens

KW - foodborne pathogens

KW - QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT

KW - HEMOLYTIC-UREMIC-SYNDROME

KW - SCOUT CAMP

KW - INFECTION

KW - OUTBREAK

KW - SCOTLAND

KW - CATTLE

KW - HAMBURGERS

KW - PREVALENCE

KW - PREVENTION

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.06.021

DO - 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.06.021

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 129

EP - 137

JO - International Journal of Food Microbiology

JF - International Journal of Food Microbiology

SN - 0168-1605

IS - 2

ER -