If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail

Traditional versus participatory model building

Christina Prell, Klaus Hubacek, Mark Reed, Claire Quinn, Nanlin Jin, Joe Holden, Tim Burt, Mike Kirby, Jan Sendzimir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The modelling of complex, dynamic and uncertain socioenvironmental systems requires close collaboration between research disciplines and stakeholders at all levels, for if such models are representations of aspects of reality, how can it be possible to build them without inputs from people who interact with the systems in reality? This paper reflects on findings of case study research involving stakeholders in knowledge creation through conceptual and formal model building to support upland water catchment management. The uncertainty, multiple scales and conflicting understandings of stakeholders inherent in natural resource management necessitate a strong focus on participatory processes in integrated modelling. This leads to the recognition that problems and solutions should be identified by the stakeholders themselves, emphasising the intersection and complementarity of lay and expert knowledge. Stakeholders in this context comprise varied groups such as land managers ( e. g. grouse moor managers and sheep farmers), water companies and water users, tourists, residents, policy-makers and researchers. Models are used at multiple stages to help formulate problems, create and compare conceptual understanding, and explore implications. This requires the involvement of stakeholders early in the problem formulation and research process to help answer the 'right' questions and provide 'relevant' outputs. This poses a number of interesting new challenges for the organisation of research. In contrast to traditional approaches of matching model components to expertise in the research team, modelling expertise must adapt to answer the questions and priorities that emerge from stakeholder engagement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-282
Number of pages20
JournalInterdisciplinary Science Reviews
Volume32
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2007

Keywords

  • carbon
  • stakeholder
  • management
  • explanations
  • integration
  • vegetation
  • scenario
  • erosion
  • Britain
  • system

Cite this

Prell, C., Hubacek, K., Reed, M., Quinn, C., Jin, N., Holden, J., ... Sendzimir, J. (2007). If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: Traditional versus participatory model building. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(3), 263-282.

If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail : Traditional versus participatory model building. / Prell, Christina; Hubacek, Klaus; Reed, Mark; Quinn, Claire; Jin, Nanlin; Holden, Joe; Burt, Tim; Kirby, Mike; Sendzimir, Jan.

In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 263-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prell, C, Hubacek, K, Reed, M, Quinn, C, Jin, N, Holden, J, Burt, T, Kirby, M & Sendzimir, J 2007, 'If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: Traditional versus participatory model building', Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 263-282.
Prell, Christina ; Hubacek, Klaus ; Reed, Mark ; Quinn, Claire ; Jin, Nanlin ; Holden, Joe ; Burt, Tim ; Kirby, Mike ; Sendzimir, Jan. / If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail : Traditional versus participatory model building. In: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 2007 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 263-282.
@article{abcf369c24524107832171947d3944ce,
title = "If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail: Traditional versus participatory model building",
abstract = "The modelling of complex, dynamic and uncertain socioenvironmental systems requires close collaboration between research disciplines and stakeholders at all levels, for if such models are representations of aspects of reality, how can it be possible to build them without inputs from people who interact with the systems in reality? This paper reflects on findings of case study research involving stakeholders in knowledge creation through conceptual and formal model building to support upland water catchment management. The uncertainty, multiple scales and conflicting understandings of stakeholders inherent in natural resource management necessitate a strong focus on participatory processes in integrated modelling. This leads to the recognition that problems and solutions should be identified by the stakeholders themselves, emphasising the intersection and complementarity of lay and expert knowledge. Stakeholders in this context comprise varied groups such as land managers ( e. g. grouse moor managers and sheep farmers), water companies and water users, tourists, residents, policy-makers and researchers. Models are used at multiple stages to help formulate problems, create and compare conceptual understanding, and explore implications. This requires the involvement of stakeholders early in the problem formulation and research process to help answer the 'right' questions and provide 'relevant' outputs. This poses a number of interesting new challenges for the organisation of research. In contrast to traditional approaches of matching model components to expertise in the research team, modelling expertise must adapt to answer the questions and priorities that emerge from stakeholder engagement.",
keywords = "carbon, stakeholder, management, explanations, integration, vegetation, scenario, erosion, Britain, system",
author = "Christina Prell and Klaus Hubacek and Mark Reed and Claire Quinn and Nanlin Jin and Joe Holden and Tim Burt and Mike Kirby and Jan Sendzimir",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "263--282",
journal = "Interdisciplinary Science Reviews",
issn = "0308-0188",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - If you have a hammer everything looks like a nail

T2 - Traditional versus participatory model building

AU - Prell, Christina

AU - Hubacek, Klaus

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Quinn, Claire

AU - Jin, Nanlin

AU - Holden, Joe

AU - Burt, Tim

AU - Kirby, Mike

AU - Sendzimir, Jan

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - The modelling of complex, dynamic and uncertain socioenvironmental systems requires close collaboration between research disciplines and stakeholders at all levels, for if such models are representations of aspects of reality, how can it be possible to build them without inputs from people who interact with the systems in reality? This paper reflects on findings of case study research involving stakeholders in knowledge creation through conceptual and formal model building to support upland water catchment management. The uncertainty, multiple scales and conflicting understandings of stakeholders inherent in natural resource management necessitate a strong focus on participatory processes in integrated modelling. This leads to the recognition that problems and solutions should be identified by the stakeholders themselves, emphasising the intersection and complementarity of lay and expert knowledge. Stakeholders in this context comprise varied groups such as land managers ( e. g. grouse moor managers and sheep farmers), water companies and water users, tourists, residents, policy-makers and researchers. Models are used at multiple stages to help formulate problems, create and compare conceptual understanding, and explore implications. This requires the involvement of stakeholders early in the problem formulation and research process to help answer the 'right' questions and provide 'relevant' outputs. This poses a number of interesting new challenges for the organisation of research. In contrast to traditional approaches of matching model components to expertise in the research team, modelling expertise must adapt to answer the questions and priorities that emerge from stakeholder engagement.

AB - The modelling of complex, dynamic and uncertain socioenvironmental systems requires close collaboration between research disciplines and stakeholders at all levels, for if such models are representations of aspects of reality, how can it be possible to build them without inputs from people who interact with the systems in reality? This paper reflects on findings of case study research involving stakeholders in knowledge creation through conceptual and formal model building to support upland water catchment management. The uncertainty, multiple scales and conflicting understandings of stakeholders inherent in natural resource management necessitate a strong focus on participatory processes in integrated modelling. This leads to the recognition that problems and solutions should be identified by the stakeholders themselves, emphasising the intersection and complementarity of lay and expert knowledge. Stakeholders in this context comprise varied groups such as land managers ( e. g. grouse moor managers and sheep farmers), water companies and water users, tourists, residents, policy-makers and researchers. Models are used at multiple stages to help formulate problems, create and compare conceptual understanding, and explore implications. This requires the involvement of stakeholders early in the problem formulation and research process to help answer the 'right' questions and provide 'relevant' outputs. This poses a number of interesting new challenges for the organisation of research. In contrast to traditional approaches of matching model components to expertise in the research team, modelling expertise must adapt to answer the questions and priorities that emerge from stakeholder engagement.

KW - carbon

KW - stakeholder

KW - management

KW - explanations

KW - integration

KW - vegetation

KW - scenario

KW - erosion

KW - Britain

KW - system

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 263

EP - 282

JO - Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

JF - Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

SN - 0308-0188

IS - 3

ER -