Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer

Neil Crawford Campbell, Alison Margaret Elliott, Linda Sharp, Lewis Duthie Ritchie, J. Cassidy, Julian Little

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95% confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment. (C) 2002 Cancer Research UK.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-590
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume87
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • lung neoplasms
  • colorectal neoplasms
  • delivery of healthcare
  • socioeconomic factors rural population urban population
  • urban differences
  • diagnosis
  • stage
  • areas

Cite this

Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. / Campbell, Neil Crawford; Elliott, Alison Margaret; Sharp, Linda; Ritchie, Lewis Duthie; Cassidy, J.; Little, Julian.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 87, No. 6, 2002, p. 585-590.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Campbell, Neil Crawford ; Elliott, Alison Margaret ; Sharp, Linda ; Ritchie, Lewis Duthie ; Cassidy, J. ; Little, Julian. / Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2002 ; Vol. 87, No. 6. pp. 585-590.
@article{231fe3fdadf8455cab39cc1b86fd9ff4,
title = "Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer",
abstract = "For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95{\%} confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95{\%} confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment. (C) 2002 Cancer Research UK.",
keywords = "lung neoplasms, colorectal neoplasms, delivery of healthcare, socioeconomic factors rural population urban population, urban differences, diagnosis, stage, areas",
author = "Campbell, {Neil Crawford} and Elliott, {Alison Margaret} and Linda Sharp and Ritchie, {Lewis Duthie} and J. Cassidy and Julian Little",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "585--590",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer

AU - Campbell, Neil Crawford

AU - Elliott, Alison Margaret

AU - Sharp, Linda

AU - Ritchie, Lewis Duthie

AU - Cassidy, J.

AU - Little, Julian

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95% confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment. (C) 2002 Cancer Research UK.

AB - For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95% confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment. (C) 2002 Cancer Research UK.

KW - lung neoplasms

KW - colorectal neoplasms

KW - delivery of healthcare

KW - socioeconomic factors rural population urban population

KW - urban differences

KW - diagnosis

KW - stage

KW - areas

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 585

EP - 590

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 6

ER -