Impact of performance in a mandatory postgraduate surgical examination on selection into specialty training

D S G Scrimgeour, J Cleland, A J Lee, G Griffiths, A J McKinley, C Marx, P A Brennan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background The Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination is undertaken by large numbers of trainees in the UK and internationally as a mandatory step within surgical training. Unlike some high‐stakes medical examinations, the MRCS is yet to be validated. A quantitative study was undertaken to assess its predictive validity by investigating the relationship between MRCS (Parts A and B) and national selection interview scores for general and vascular surgery in the UK. Methods Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the linear relationship between each assessment, and linear regression analyses were employed to identify potential independent predictors of the national selection score. All UK medical graduates who attempted the interview in 2011–2015 were included. Results Some 84·4 per cent of the candidates (1231 of 1458) were matched with MRCS data. There was a significant positive correlation between the first attempt score at Part B of the MRCS examination and the national selection score (r = 0·38, P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, 17 per cent of variance in the national selection first attempt score was explained by the Part B MRCS score and number of attempts (change in R2 value of 0·10 and 0·07 respectively; P < 0·001). Candidates who required more than two attempts at Part B were predicted to score 8·1 per cent less than equally matched candidates who passed at their first attempt. Conclusion This study supports validity of the MRCS examination, and indicates its predictive value regarding entry into specialist training.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-74
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Interviews
Surgeons
Blood Vessels
Linear Models
Regression Analysis

Cite this

Impact of performance in a mandatory postgraduate surgical examination on selection into specialty training. / Scrimgeour, D S G; Cleland, J; Lee, A J; Griffiths, G ; McKinley, A J; Marx, C ; Brennan, P A.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 1, No. 3, 30.06.2017, p. 67-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scrimgeour, D S G ; Cleland, J ; Lee, A J ; Griffiths, G ; McKinley, A J ; Marx, C ; Brennan, P A. / Impact of performance in a mandatory postgraduate surgical examination on selection into specialty training. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 67-74.
@article{6a208c819e184301b5d0fcdb1e87bb8c,
title = "Impact of performance in a mandatory postgraduate surgical examination on selection into specialty training",
abstract = "Background The Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination is undertaken by large numbers of trainees in the UK and internationally as a mandatory step within surgical training. Unlike some high‐stakes medical examinations, the MRCS is yet to be validated. A quantitative study was undertaken to assess its predictive validity by investigating the relationship between MRCS (Parts A and B) and national selection interview scores for general and vascular surgery in the UK. Methods Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the linear relationship between each assessment, and linear regression analyses were employed to identify potential independent predictors of the national selection score. All UK medical graduates who attempted the interview in 2011–2015 were included. Results Some 84·4 per cent of the candidates (1231 of 1458) were matched with MRCS data. There was a significant positive correlation between the first attempt score at Part B of the MRCS examination and the national selection score (r = 0·38, P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, 17 per cent of variance in the national selection first attempt score was explained by the Part B MRCS score and number of attempts (change in R2 value of 0·10 and 0·07 respectively; P < 0·001). Candidates who required more than two attempts at Part B were predicted to score 8·1 per cent less than equally matched candidates who passed at their first attempt. Conclusion This study supports validity of the MRCS examination, and indicates its predictive value regarding entry into specialist training.",
author = "Scrimgeour, {D S G} and J Cleland and Lee, {A J} and G Griffiths and McKinley, {A J} and C Marx and Brennan, {P A}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1002/bjs5.7",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "67--74",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "British Journal of Surgery",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of performance in a mandatory postgraduate surgical examination on selection into specialty training

AU - Scrimgeour, D S G

AU - Cleland, J

AU - Lee, A J

AU - Griffiths, G

AU - McKinley, A J

AU - Marx, C

AU - Brennan, P A

PY - 2017/6/30

Y1 - 2017/6/30

N2 - Background The Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination is undertaken by large numbers of trainees in the UK and internationally as a mandatory step within surgical training. Unlike some high‐stakes medical examinations, the MRCS is yet to be validated. A quantitative study was undertaken to assess its predictive validity by investigating the relationship between MRCS (Parts A and B) and national selection interview scores for general and vascular surgery in the UK. Methods Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the linear relationship between each assessment, and linear regression analyses were employed to identify potential independent predictors of the national selection score. All UK medical graduates who attempted the interview in 2011–2015 were included. Results Some 84·4 per cent of the candidates (1231 of 1458) were matched with MRCS data. There was a significant positive correlation between the first attempt score at Part B of the MRCS examination and the national selection score (r = 0·38, P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, 17 per cent of variance in the national selection first attempt score was explained by the Part B MRCS score and number of attempts (change in R2 value of 0·10 and 0·07 respectively; P < 0·001). Candidates who required more than two attempts at Part B were predicted to score 8·1 per cent less than equally matched candidates who passed at their first attempt. Conclusion This study supports validity of the MRCS examination, and indicates its predictive value regarding entry into specialist training.

AB - Background The Intercollegiate Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons (MRCS) examination is undertaken by large numbers of trainees in the UK and internationally as a mandatory step within surgical training. Unlike some high‐stakes medical examinations, the MRCS is yet to be validated. A quantitative study was undertaken to assess its predictive validity by investigating the relationship between MRCS (Parts A and B) and national selection interview scores for general and vascular surgery in the UK. Methods Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the linear relationship between each assessment, and linear regression analyses were employed to identify potential independent predictors of the national selection score. All UK medical graduates who attempted the interview in 2011–2015 were included. Results Some 84·4 per cent of the candidates (1231 of 1458) were matched with MRCS data. There was a significant positive correlation between the first attempt score at Part B of the MRCS examination and the national selection score (r = 0·38, P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, 17 per cent of variance in the national selection first attempt score was explained by the Part B MRCS score and number of attempts (change in R2 value of 0·10 and 0·07 respectively; P < 0·001). Candidates who required more than two attempts at Part B were predicted to score 8·1 per cent less than equally matched candidates who passed at their first attempt. Conclusion This study supports validity of the MRCS examination, and indicates its predictive value regarding entry into specialist training.

U2 - 10.1002/bjs5.7

DO - 10.1002/bjs5.7

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 67

EP - 74

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 3

ER -