Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability

Christian Schader, Adrian Muller, Nadia El-Hage Scialabba, Judith Hecht, Anne Isensee, Karl-Heinz Erb, Pete Smith, Harinder P S Makkar, Peter Klocke, Florian Leiber, Patrizia Schwegler, Matthias Stolze, Urs Niggli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

71 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Increasing efficiency in livestock production and reducing the share of animal products in human consumption are two strategies to curb the adverse environmental impacts of the livestock sector. Here, we explore the room for sustainable livestock production by modelling the impacts and constraints of a third strategy in which livestock feed components that compete with direct human food crop production are reduced. Thus, in the outmost scenario, animals are fed only from grassland and by-products from food production. We show that this strategy could provide sufficient food (equal amounts of human-digestible energy and a similar protein/calorie ratio as in the reference scenario for 2050) and reduce environmental impacts compared with the reference scenario (in the most extreme case of zero human-edible concentrate feed: greenhouse gas emissions -18%; arable land occupation -26%, N-surplus -46%; P-surplus -40%; non-renewable energy use -36%, pesticide use intensity -22%, freshwater use -21%, soil erosion potential -12%). These results occur despite the fact that environmental efficiency of livestock production is reduced compared with the reference scenario, which is the consequence of the grassland-based feed for ruminants and the less optimal feeding rations based on by-products for non-ruminants. This apparent contradiction results from considerable reductions of animal products in human diets (protein intake per capita from livestock products reduced by 71%). We show that such a strategy focusing on feed components which do not compete with direct human food consumption offers a viable complement to strategies focusing on increased efficiency in production or reduced shares of animal products in consumption.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20150891
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume12
Issue number113
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Livestock
Farms
Sustainable development
Food
Animals
Byproducts
Environmental impact
Proteins
Curbs
Ruminants
Nutrition
Pesticides
Fresh Water
Gas emissions
Greenhouse gases
Crops
Erosion
Soil
Gases
Diet

Cite this

Schader, C., Muller, A., Scialabba, N. E-H., Hecht, J., Isensee, A., Erb, K-H., ... Niggli, U. (2015). Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12(113), [20150891]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0891

Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. / Schader, Christian; Muller, Adrian; Scialabba, Nadia El-Hage; Hecht, Judith; Isensee, Anne; Erb, Karl-Heinz; Smith, Pete; Makkar, Harinder P S; Klocke, Peter; Leiber, Florian; Schwegler, Patrizia; Stolze, Matthias; Niggli, Urs.

In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface, Vol. 12, No. 113, 20150891, 16.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schader, C, Muller, A, Scialabba, NE-H, Hecht, J, Isensee, A, Erb, K-H, Smith, P, Makkar, HPS, Klocke, P, Leiber, F, Schwegler, P, Stolze, M & Niggli, U 2015, 'Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability', Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 12, no. 113, 20150891. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0891
Schader, Christian ; Muller, Adrian ; Scialabba, Nadia El-Hage ; Hecht, Judith ; Isensee, Anne ; Erb, Karl-Heinz ; Smith, Pete ; Makkar, Harinder P S ; Klocke, Peter ; Leiber, Florian ; Schwegler, Patrizia ; Stolze, Matthias ; Niggli, Urs. / Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability. In: Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 113.
@article{12da5150376e4b2cbad0d3ecfeccc3eb,
title = "Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability",
abstract = "Increasing efficiency in livestock production and reducing the share of animal products in human consumption are two strategies to curb the adverse environmental impacts of the livestock sector. Here, we explore the room for sustainable livestock production by modelling the impacts and constraints of a third strategy in which livestock feed components that compete with direct human food crop production are reduced. Thus, in the outmost scenario, animals are fed only from grassland and by-products from food production. We show that this strategy could provide sufficient food (equal amounts of human-digestible energy and a similar protein/calorie ratio as in the reference scenario for 2050) and reduce environmental impacts compared with the reference scenario (in the most extreme case of zero human-edible concentrate feed: greenhouse gas emissions -18{\%}; arable land occupation -26{\%}, N-surplus -46{\%}; P-surplus -40{\%}; non-renewable energy use -36{\%}, pesticide use intensity -22{\%}, freshwater use -21{\%}, soil erosion potential -12{\%}). These results occur despite the fact that environmental efficiency of livestock production is reduced compared with the reference scenario, which is the consequence of the grassland-based feed for ruminants and the less optimal feeding rations based on by-products for non-ruminants. This apparent contradiction results from considerable reductions of animal products in human diets (protein intake per capita from livestock products reduced by 71{\%}). We show that such a strategy focusing on feed components which do not compete with direct human food consumption offers a viable complement to strategies focusing on increased efficiency in production or reduced shares of animal products in consumption.",
author = "Christian Schader and Adrian Muller and Scialabba, {Nadia El-Hage} and Judith Hecht and Anne Isensee and Karl-Heinz Erb and Pete Smith and Makkar, {Harinder P S} and Peter Klocke and Florian Leiber and Patrizia Schwegler and Matthias Stolze and Urs Niggli",
note = "Funding Christian Schader, Adrian Muller, Nadia El-Hage Scialabba, Judith Hecht, Anne Isensee, Harinder P.S. Makkar, Peter Klocke, Florian Leiber, Matthias Stolze, Urs Niggli thank FAO for funding this research. K.E. gratefully acknowledges funding from ERC-2010-Stg-263522 LUISE. Additional data and method details are provided in the supplementary materials. The contribution of P.S. is supported by funding from the Belmont Forum-FACCE-JPI Project ‘Delivering Food on Limited Land’ (DEVIL), with the UK contribution supported by NERC (NE/M021327/1).",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1098/rsif.2015.0891",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of the Royal Society Interface",
issn = "1742-5689",
publisher = "Royal Society of London",
number = "113",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impacts of feeding less food-competing feedstuffs to livestock on global food system sustainability

AU - Schader, Christian

AU - Muller, Adrian

AU - Scialabba, Nadia El-Hage

AU - Hecht, Judith

AU - Isensee, Anne

AU - Erb, Karl-Heinz

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Makkar, Harinder P S

AU - Klocke, Peter

AU - Leiber, Florian

AU - Schwegler, Patrizia

AU - Stolze, Matthias

AU - Niggli, Urs

N1 - Funding Christian Schader, Adrian Muller, Nadia El-Hage Scialabba, Judith Hecht, Anne Isensee, Harinder P.S. Makkar, Peter Klocke, Florian Leiber, Matthias Stolze, Urs Niggli thank FAO for funding this research. K.E. gratefully acknowledges funding from ERC-2010-Stg-263522 LUISE. Additional data and method details are provided in the supplementary materials. The contribution of P.S. is supported by funding from the Belmont Forum-FACCE-JPI Project ‘Delivering Food on Limited Land’ (DEVIL), with the UK contribution supported by NERC (NE/M021327/1).

PY - 2015/12/16

Y1 - 2015/12/16

N2 - Increasing efficiency in livestock production and reducing the share of animal products in human consumption are two strategies to curb the adverse environmental impacts of the livestock sector. Here, we explore the room for sustainable livestock production by modelling the impacts and constraints of a third strategy in which livestock feed components that compete with direct human food crop production are reduced. Thus, in the outmost scenario, animals are fed only from grassland and by-products from food production. We show that this strategy could provide sufficient food (equal amounts of human-digestible energy and a similar protein/calorie ratio as in the reference scenario for 2050) and reduce environmental impacts compared with the reference scenario (in the most extreme case of zero human-edible concentrate feed: greenhouse gas emissions -18%; arable land occupation -26%, N-surplus -46%; P-surplus -40%; non-renewable energy use -36%, pesticide use intensity -22%, freshwater use -21%, soil erosion potential -12%). These results occur despite the fact that environmental efficiency of livestock production is reduced compared with the reference scenario, which is the consequence of the grassland-based feed for ruminants and the less optimal feeding rations based on by-products for non-ruminants. This apparent contradiction results from considerable reductions of animal products in human diets (protein intake per capita from livestock products reduced by 71%). We show that such a strategy focusing on feed components which do not compete with direct human food consumption offers a viable complement to strategies focusing on increased efficiency in production or reduced shares of animal products in consumption.

AB - Increasing efficiency in livestock production and reducing the share of animal products in human consumption are two strategies to curb the adverse environmental impacts of the livestock sector. Here, we explore the room for sustainable livestock production by modelling the impacts and constraints of a third strategy in which livestock feed components that compete with direct human food crop production are reduced. Thus, in the outmost scenario, animals are fed only from grassland and by-products from food production. We show that this strategy could provide sufficient food (equal amounts of human-digestible energy and a similar protein/calorie ratio as in the reference scenario for 2050) and reduce environmental impacts compared with the reference scenario (in the most extreme case of zero human-edible concentrate feed: greenhouse gas emissions -18%; arable land occupation -26%, N-surplus -46%; P-surplus -40%; non-renewable energy use -36%, pesticide use intensity -22%, freshwater use -21%, soil erosion potential -12%). These results occur despite the fact that environmental efficiency of livestock production is reduced compared with the reference scenario, which is the consequence of the grassland-based feed for ruminants and the less optimal feeding rations based on by-products for non-ruminants. This apparent contradiction results from considerable reductions of animal products in human diets (protein intake per capita from livestock products reduced by 71%). We show that such a strategy focusing on feed components which do not compete with direct human food consumption offers a viable complement to strategies focusing on increased efficiency in production or reduced shares of animal products in consumption.

U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2015.0891

DO - 10.1098/rsif.2015.0891

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface

SN - 1742-5689

IS - 113

M1 - 20150891

ER -