Implementing health policy

lessons from the Scottish Well Mens policy initiative

Flora Douglas, Edwin Van Teijlingen, Cairns Smith, Mandy Moffat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Little is known about how health professionals translate national government health policy directives into action. This paper examines that process using the so-called Well Men's Services (WMS) policy initiative as a ‘real world’ case study. The WMS were launched by the Scottish Government to address men's health inequalities. Our analysis aimed to develop a deeper understanding of policy implementation as it naturally occurred, used an analytical framework that was developed to reflect the ‘rational planning' principles health professionals are commonly encouraged to use for implementation purposes. Methods and materials: A mixed-methods qualitative enquiry using a data archive generated during the WMS policy evaluation was used to critically analyze (post hoc) the perspectives of national policy makers, and local health and social care professionals about the: (a) ‘policy problem’, (b) interventions intended to address the problem, and (c) anticipated policy outcomes. Results and conclusions: This analysis revealed four key themes: (1) ambiguity regarding the policy problem and means of intervention; (2) behavioral framing of the policy problem and intervention; (3) uncertainty about the policy evidence base and outcomes, and; (4) a focus on intervention as outcome. This study found that mechanistic planning heuristics (as a means of supporting implementation) fails to grapple with the indeterminate nature of population health problems. A new approach to planning and implementing public health interventions is required that recognises the complex and political nature of health problems; the inevitability of imperfect and contested evidence regarding intervention, and, future associated uncertainties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)887-905
Number of pages19
JournalAIMS Public Health
Volume2
Issue number4
Early online date21 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Health Policy
Uncertainty
Health
Men's Health
Health Planning
Federal Government
Administrative Personnel
Public Health
Delivery of Health Care
Population

Keywords

  • policy implementation
  • health inequalities
  • men's health
  • planning frameworks
  • Scotland

Cite this

Implementing health policy : lessons from the Scottish Well Mens policy initiative. / Douglas, Flora; Van Teijlingen, Edwin; Smith, Cairns; Moffat, Mandy.

In: AIMS Public Health, Vol. 2, No. 4, 21.12.2015, p. 887-905.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Douglas, Flora ; Van Teijlingen, Edwin ; Smith, Cairns ; Moffat, Mandy. / Implementing health policy : lessons from the Scottish Well Mens policy initiative. In: AIMS Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 887-905.
@article{4215175edc3f44bca3ff452375da22d4,
title = "Implementing health policy: lessons from the Scottish Well Mens policy initiative",
abstract = "Background: Little is known about how health professionals translate national government health policy directives into action. This paper examines that process using the so-called Well Men's Services (WMS) policy initiative as a ‘real world’ case study. The WMS were launched by the Scottish Government to address men's health inequalities. Our analysis aimed to develop a deeper understanding of policy implementation as it naturally occurred, used an analytical framework that was developed to reflect the ‘rational planning' principles health professionals are commonly encouraged to use for implementation purposes. Methods and materials: A mixed-methods qualitative enquiry using a data archive generated during the WMS policy evaluation was used to critically analyze (post hoc) the perspectives of national policy makers, and local health and social care professionals about the: (a) ‘policy problem’, (b) interventions intended to address the problem, and (c) anticipated policy outcomes. Results and conclusions: This analysis revealed four key themes: (1) ambiguity regarding the policy problem and means of intervention; (2) behavioral framing of the policy problem and intervention; (3) uncertainty about the policy evidence base and outcomes, and; (4) a focus on intervention as outcome. This study found that mechanistic planning heuristics (as a means of supporting implementation) fails to grapple with the indeterminate nature of population health problems. A new approach to planning and implementing public health interventions is required that recognises the complex and political nature of health problems; the inevitability of imperfect and contested evidence regarding intervention, and, future associated uncertainties.",
keywords = "policy implementation, health inequalities, men's health, planning frameworks, Scotland",
author = "Flora Douglas and {Van Teijlingen}, Edwin and Cairns Smith and Mandy Moffat",
note = "Date of Acceptance: 11/12/2015 Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge those participants who gave their time and energy to this study. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers of the article whose helpful critique of our paper at the review stage has played a role in the production of this manuscript.",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "21",
doi = "10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.887",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "887--905",
journal = "AIMS Public Health",
issn = "2327-8994",
publisher = "AIMS Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing health policy

T2 - lessons from the Scottish Well Mens policy initiative

AU - Douglas, Flora

AU - Van Teijlingen, Edwin

AU - Smith, Cairns

AU - Moffat, Mandy

N1 - Date of Acceptance: 11/12/2015 Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge those participants who gave their time and energy to this study. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers of the article whose helpful critique of our paper at the review stage has played a role in the production of this manuscript.

PY - 2015/12/21

Y1 - 2015/12/21

N2 - Background: Little is known about how health professionals translate national government health policy directives into action. This paper examines that process using the so-called Well Men's Services (WMS) policy initiative as a ‘real world’ case study. The WMS were launched by the Scottish Government to address men's health inequalities. Our analysis aimed to develop a deeper understanding of policy implementation as it naturally occurred, used an analytical framework that was developed to reflect the ‘rational planning' principles health professionals are commonly encouraged to use for implementation purposes. Methods and materials: A mixed-methods qualitative enquiry using a data archive generated during the WMS policy evaluation was used to critically analyze (post hoc) the perspectives of national policy makers, and local health and social care professionals about the: (a) ‘policy problem’, (b) interventions intended to address the problem, and (c) anticipated policy outcomes. Results and conclusions: This analysis revealed four key themes: (1) ambiguity regarding the policy problem and means of intervention; (2) behavioral framing of the policy problem and intervention; (3) uncertainty about the policy evidence base and outcomes, and; (4) a focus on intervention as outcome. This study found that mechanistic planning heuristics (as a means of supporting implementation) fails to grapple with the indeterminate nature of population health problems. A new approach to planning and implementing public health interventions is required that recognises the complex and political nature of health problems; the inevitability of imperfect and contested evidence regarding intervention, and, future associated uncertainties.

AB - Background: Little is known about how health professionals translate national government health policy directives into action. This paper examines that process using the so-called Well Men's Services (WMS) policy initiative as a ‘real world’ case study. The WMS were launched by the Scottish Government to address men's health inequalities. Our analysis aimed to develop a deeper understanding of policy implementation as it naturally occurred, used an analytical framework that was developed to reflect the ‘rational planning' principles health professionals are commonly encouraged to use for implementation purposes. Methods and materials: A mixed-methods qualitative enquiry using a data archive generated during the WMS policy evaluation was used to critically analyze (post hoc) the perspectives of national policy makers, and local health and social care professionals about the: (a) ‘policy problem’, (b) interventions intended to address the problem, and (c) anticipated policy outcomes. Results and conclusions: This analysis revealed four key themes: (1) ambiguity regarding the policy problem and means of intervention; (2) behavioral framing of the policy problem and intervention; (3) uncertainty about the policy evidence base and outcomes, and; (4) a focus on intervention as outcome. This study found that mechanistic planning heuristics (as a means of supporting implementation) fails to grapple with the indeterminate nature of population health problems. A new approach to planning and implementing public health interventions is required that recognises the complex and political nature of health problems; the inevitability of imperfect and contested evidence regarding intervention, and, future associated uncertainties.

KW - policy implementation

KW - health inequalities

KW - men's health

KW - planning frameworks

KW - Scotland

U2 - 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.887

DO - 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.887

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 887

EP - 905

JO - AIMS Public Health

JF - AIMS Public Health

SN - 2327-8994

IS - 4

ER -