Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges

Lindsay C. Stringer, Mark Reed, Andrew J. Dougill, Mary K. Seely, Martin Rokitzki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) emphasizes the need for public participation in land degradation assessment and rehabilitation. While participatory approaches are supported by a growing body of research and practice, meaningfully involving the people affected by land degradation is far from straightforward. This paper investigates the challenge of using the UNCCD as a guide to influence community participation in policy-making and practice at national and local levels by analyzing experiences from three southern African countries. We show that the UNCCD represents a useful normative framework for addressing degradation problems, but that the participatory ethos is difficult to enact at the national level. Whilst there is increasing evidence that combining local and scientific knowledge using participatory mechanisms can deliver the benefits that the Convention strives to achieve, communication between researchers and practitioners, and those involved in implementing the UNCCD at the national level needs to be strengthened. Broad lessons and best practices in incorporating participatory practices into policy development are elucidated. Our case studies show that a range of mixed-method, interdisciplinary approaches can enable policy-makers and practitioners to meaningfully engage those who are affected by land degradation in its definition, assessment and rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)198-211
Number of pages14
JournalNatural Resources Forum
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007

Keywords

  • UNCCD
  • participation
  • land degradation
  • Swaziland
  • Botswana
  • Namibia
  • Africa
  • social-ecological-systems
  • combating desertification
  • community-action
  • Kalahari
  • science
  • management
  • understandings
  • resilience

Cite this

Stringer, L. C., Reed, M., Dougill, A. J., Seely, M. K., & Rokitzki, M. (2007). Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges. Natural Resources Forum, 31(3), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00154.x

Implementing the UNCCD : Participatory challenges. / Stringer, Lindsay C.; Reed, Mark; Dougill, Andrew J.; Seely, Mary K.; Rokitzki, Martin.

In: Natural Resources Forum, Vol. 31, No. 3, 08.2007, p. 198-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stringer, LC, Reed, M, Dougill, AJ, Seely, MK & Rokitzki, M 2007, 'Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges' Natural Resources Forum, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00154.x
Stringer LC, Reed M, Dougill AJ, Seely MK, Rokitzki M. Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges. Natural Resources Forum. 2007 Aug;31(3):198-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00154.x
Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Reed, Mark ; Dougill, Andrew J. ; Seely, Mary K. ; Rokitzki, Martin. / Implementing the UNCCD : Participatory challenges. In: Natural Resources Forum. 2007 ; Vol. 31, No. 3. pp. 198-211.
@article{dee9677acc734602bc7297c04f1d6d3b,
title = "Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges",
abstract = "The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) emphasizes the need for public participation in land degradation assessment and rehabilitation. While participatory approaches are supported by a growing body of research and practice, meaningfully involving the people affected by land degradation is far from straightforward. This paper investigates the challenge of using the UNCCD as a guide to influence community participation in policy-making and practice at national and local levels by analyzing experiences from three southern African countries. We show that the UNCCD represents a useful normative framework for addressing degradation problems, but that the participatory ethos is difficult to enact at the national level. Whilst there is increasing evidence that combining local and scientific knowledge using participatory mechanisms can deliver the benefits that the Convention strives to achieve, communication between researchers and practitioners, and those involved in implementing the UNCCD at the national level needs to be strengthened. Broad lessons and best practices in incorporating participatory practices into policy development are elucidated. Our case studies show that a range of mixed-method, interdisciplinary approaches can enable policy-makers and practitioners to meaningfully engage those who are affected by land degradation in its definition, assessment and rehabilitation.",
keywords = "UNCCD, participation, land degradation, Swaziland, Botswana, Namibia, Africa, social-ecological-systems, combating desertification, community-action, Kalahari, science, management, understandings, resilience",
author = "Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Mark Reed and Dougill, {Andrew J.} and Seely, {Mary K.} and Martin Rokitzki",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00154.x",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "198--211",
journal = "Natural Resources Forum",
issn = "0165-0203",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing the UNCCD

T2 - Participatory challenges

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Dougill, Andrew J.

AU - Seely, Mary K.

AU - Rokitzki, Martin

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) emphasizes the need for public participation in land degradation assessment and rehabilitation. While participatory approaches are supported by a growing body of research and practice, meaningfully involving the people affected by land degradation is far from straightforward. This paper investigates the challenge of using the UNCCD as a guide to influence community participation in policy-making and practice at national and local levels by analyzing experiences from three southern African countries. We show that the UNCCD represents a useful normative framework for addressing degradation problems, but that the participatory ethos is difficult to enact at the national level. Whilst there is increasing evidence that combining local and scientific knowledge using participatory mechanisms can deliver the benefits that the Convention strives to achieve, communication between researchers and practitioners, and those involved in implementing the UNCCD at the national level needs to be strengthened. Broad lessons and best practices in incorporating participatory practices into policy development are elucidated. Our case studies show that a range of mixed-method, interdisciplinary approaches can enable policy-makers and practitioners to meaningfully engage those who are affected by land degradation in its definition, assessment and rehabilitation.

AB - The United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) emphasizes the need for public participation in land degradation assessment and rehabilitation. While participatory approaches are supported by a growing body of research and practice, meaningfully involving the people affected by land degradation is far from straightforward. This paper investigates the challenge of using the UNCCD as a guide to influence community participation in policy-making and practice at national and local levels by analyzing experiences from three southern African countries. We show that the UNCCD represents a useful normative framework for addressing degradation problems, but that the participatory ethos is difficult to enact at the national level. Whilst there is increasing evidence that combining local and scientific knowledge using participatory mechanisms can deliver the benefits that the Convention strives to achieve, communication between researchers and practitioners, and those involved in implementing the UNCCD at the national level needs to be strengthened. Broad lessons and best practices in incorporating participatory practices into policy development are elucidated. Our case studies show that a range of mixed-method, interdisciplinary approaches can enable policy-makers and practitioners to meaningfully engage those who are affected by land degradation in its definition, assessment and rehabilitation.

KW - UNCCD

KW - participation

KW - land degradation

KW - Swaziland

KW - Botswana

KW - Namibia

KW - Africa

KW - social-ecological-systems

KW - combating desertification

KW - community-action

KW - Kalahari

KW - science

KW - management

KW - understandings

KW - resilience

U2 - 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00154.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00154.x

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 198

EP - 211

JO - Natural Resources Forum

JF - Natural Resources Forum

SN - 0165-0203

IS - 3

ER -