Implicit self-comparisons against others could bias quality of life assessments

Peter Fayers, Anne Louise Langston, Clare Robertson, PRISM Trial Grp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To explore how patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) and global health status are affected by use of differing personal reference frames. We hypothesized that implicit comparisons against self at an earlier time, against healthy peers, or against ill patients would greatly affect patients' response values.

Study Design and Setting: Patients in a randomized trial for treatment of Paget's disease completed annual HRQL questionnaires. Supplementary questions were appended, asking the patients whether they were aware of having made implicit comparisons.

Results: The majority of patients reported considering themselves a year ago (31% at baseline), themselves before becoming ill (23%), or other healthy people (24%), with similar proportions during follow-up. Mean HRQL scores varied substantially according to the declared frame of reference, with differences as big as 19% of the scale score, or a standardized mean effect size of 0.74 standard deviations.

Conclusion: Reported reference frames were associated with effects of similar magnitude to the differences in HRQL that are regarded as clinically important. This may be of particular concern in trials that randomize patients to management in different settings, such as treatment at home/in hospital, or surgery/chemotherapy and might bias or obscure HRQL differences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1034-1039
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume60
Issue number10
Early online date25 Jul 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2007

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • self-reported health
  • self-rated health
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • reference frames
  • response shift
  • rated health
  • mortality
  • care
  • oncology
  • age

Cite this

Implicit self-comparisons against others could bias quality of life assessments. / Fayers, Peter; Langston, Anne Louise; Robertson, Clare; PRISM Trial Grp.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 60, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 1034-1039.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4982bb94530540d59e4be328c42a4237,
title = "Implicit self-comparisons against others could bias quality of life assessments",
abstract = "Objectives: To explore how patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) and global health status are affected by use of differing personal reference frames. We hypothesized that implicit comparisons against self at an earlier time, against healthy peers, or against ill patients would greatly affect patients' response values. Study Design and Setting: Patients in a randomized trial for treatment of Paget's disease completed annual HRQL questionnaires. Supplementary questions were appended, asking the patients whether they were aware of having made implicit comparisons. Results: The majority of patients reported considering themselves a year ago (31{\%} at baseline), themselves before becoming ill (23{\%}), or other healthy people (24{\%}), with similar proportions during follow-up. Mean HRQL scores varied substantially according to the declared frame of reference, with differences as big as 19{\%} of the scale score, or a standardized mean effect size of 0.74 standard deviations. Conclusion: Reported reference frames were associated with effects of similar magnitude to the differences in HRQL that are regarded as clinically important. This may be of particular concern in trials that randomize patients to management in different settings, such as treatment at home/in hospital, or surgery/chemotherapy and might bias or obscure HRQL differences.",
keywords = "quality of life, self-reported health, self-rated health, patient-reported outcomes, reference frames, response shift, rated health, mortality, care, oncology, age",
author = "Peter Fayers and Langston, {Anne Louise} and Clare Robertson and {PRISM Trial Grp}",
note = "Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge the Arthritis Research Campaign, the National Association for the Relief of Paget’s Disease, and The Alliance for Better Bone Health (Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Aventis) for grant support of the PRISM trial. The Health Services Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Department of Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding body. We also wish to acknowledge the support of the PRISM Trial Group.",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.005",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "1034--1039",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implicit self-comparisons against others could bias quality of life assessments

AU - Fayers, Peter

AU - Langston, Anne Louise

AU - Robertson, Clare

AU - PRISM Trial Grp

N1 - Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge the Arthritis Research Campaign, the National Association for the Relief of Paget’s Disease, and The Alliance for Better Bone Health (Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Aventis) for grant support of the PRISM trial. The Health Services Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Department of Health. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding body. We also wish to acknowledge the support of the PRISM Trial Group.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - Objectives: To explore how patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) and global health status are affected by use of differing personal reference frames. We hypothesized that implicit comparisons against self at an earlier time, against healthy peers, or against ill patients would greatly affect patients' response values. Study Design and Setting: Patients in a randomized trial for treatment of Paget's disease completed annual HRQL questionnaires. Supplementary questions were appended, asking the patients whether they were aware of having made implicit comparisons. Results: The majority of patients reported considering themselves a year ago (31% at baseline), themselves before becoming ill (23%), or other healthy people (24%), with similar proportions during follow-up. Mean HRQL scores varied substantially according to the declared frame of reference, with differences as big as 19% of the scale score, or a standardized mean effect size of 0.74 standard deviations. Conclusion: Reported reference frames were associated with effects of similar magnitude to the differences in HRQL that are regarded as clinically important. This may be of particular concern in trials that randomize patients to management in different settings, such as treatment at home/in hospital, or surgery/chemotherapy and might bias or obscure HRQL differences.

AB - Objectives: To explore how patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) and global health status are affected by use of differing personal reference frames. We hypothesized that implicit comparisons against self at an earlier time, against healthy peers, or against ill patients would greatly affect patients' response values. Study Design and Setting: Patients in a randomized trial for treatment of Paget's disease completed annual HRQL questionnaires. Supplementary questions were appended, asking the patients whether they were aware of having made implicit comparisons. Results: The majority of patients reported considering themselves a year ago (31% at baseline), themselves before becoming ill (23%), or other healthy people (24%), with similar proportions during follow-up. Mean HRQL scores varied substantially according to the declared frame of reference, with differences as big as 19% of the scale score, or a standardized mean effect size of 0.74 standard deviations. Conclusion: Reported reference frames were associated with effects of similar magnitude to the differences in HRQL that are regarded as clinically important. This may be of particular concern in trials that randomize patients to management in different settings, such as treatment at home/in hospital, or surgery/chemotherapy and might bias or obscure HRQL differences.

KW - quality of life

KW - self-reported health

KW - self-rated health

KW - patient-reported outcomes

KW - reference frames

KW - response shift

KW - rated health

KW - mortality

KW - care

KW - oncology

KW - age

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.005

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 1034

EP - 1039

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 10

ER -