variation and reasons for non-adherence is key to improving CPG adherence, harmonising clinicallyappropriate and cost-effective care.
Objective To overview approaches to improving guideline adherence, provide urology specific examples of knowledge-practice gaps, and highlight potential solutions informed by implementation science.
Evidence Acquisition Three common approaches to implementation science (the Knowledge-To Action framework, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, and the Behaviour Change Wheel), are summarised.
Evidence Synthesis Three implementation problems in urology are illustrated (underuse of single instillation of intravesical chemotherapy in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, overuse of androgen deprivation therapy in localised prostate cancer, and guideline discordant imaging in prostate cancer).
Research using implementation science approaches to address these implementation problems is discussed.
Conclusion: Urologists, patients, healthcare providers, funders, and other key stakeholders must commit to reliably capturing and reporting data on patient outcomes, practice variations, guideline adherence, and the impact of adherence on outcomes. Leveraging implementation science frameworks is a sound next step towards improving guideline adherence and the associated benefits of evidence-based care.
Patient Summary: Clinical practice guidelines documents are created by expert panels. These documents provide overviews of the evidence for the tests and treatments used in patient care. They also provide recommendations and it is expected that in most circumstances clinicians will follow these recommendations. Sometimes, healthcare professionals can’t or don’t follow these recommendations and it is not always clear why. In this review article we look at some examples of research approaches to addressing this problem of ‘non-adherence’, and we provide some urology specific examples.
|Journal||European Urology Focus|
|Publication status||Accepted/In press - 27 Sep 2021|