Improving the validation of finite element models with quantitative full-field strain comparisons

F Gröning, J A Bright, M J Fagan, P O'Higgins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The techniques used to validate finite element (FE) models against experimental results have changed little during the last decades, even though the traditional approach of using single point measurements from strain gauges has major limitations: the strain distribution across the surface is not captured and the accurate determination of strain gauge positions on the model surface is difficult if the 3D surface topography of the bone surface is not measured. The full-field strain measurement technique of digital speckle pattern interferometry (DSPI) can overcome these problems, but the potential of this technique has not yet been fully exploited in validation studies. Here we explore new ways of quantifying and visualising the variation in strain magnitudes and orientations within and between repeated DSPI measurements as well as between the DSPI measurements and FEA results. We show that our approach provides a much more comprehensive and accurate validation than traditional methods. The measurement repeatability and the correspondence between measured and predicted strains vary to a great degree within and between measurement areas. The two models used in this study predict the measured strain directions and magnitudes surprisingly well considering that homogeneous and isotropic mechanical properties were assigned to the models. However, the full-field comparisons also reveal some discrepancies between measured and predicted strains that are most probably caused by inaccuracies in the models' geometries and the degree of simplification of the modelled material properties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1498-1506
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume45
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2012

Fingerprint

Interferometry
Speckle
Strain gages
Validation Studies
Theoretical Models
Strain measurement
Bone and Bones
Surface topography
Materials properties
Bone
Finite element method
Mechanical properties
Geometry

Keywords

  • bite force
  • computer simulation
  • dental stress analysis
  • elastic modulus
  • finite element analysis
  • humans
  • mandible
  • models, biological
  • reproducibility of results
  • sensitivity and specificity

Cite this

Improving the validation of finite element models with quantitative full-field strain comparisons. / Gröning, F; Bright, J A; Fagan, M J; O'Higgins, P.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 45, No. 8, 11.05.2012, p. 1498-1506.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gröning, F ; Bright, J A ; Fagan, M J ; O'Higgins, P. / Improving the validation of finite element models with quantitative full-field strain comparisons. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2012 ; Vol. 45, No. 8. pp. 1498-1506.
@article{3df05dbec32e4d90bff60704232796d1,
title = "Improving the validation of finite element models with quantitative full-field strain comparisons",
abstract = "The techniques used to validate finite element (FE) models against experimental results have changed little during the last decades, even though the traditional approach of using single point measurements from strain gauges has major limitations: the strain distribution across the surface is not captured and the accurate determination of strain gauge positions on the model surface is difficult if the 3D surface topography of the bone surface is not measured. The full-field strain measurement technique of digital speckle pattern interferometry (DSPI) can overcome these problems, but the potential of this technique has not yet been fully exploited in validation studies. Here we explore new ways of quantifying and visualising the variation in strain magnitudes and orientations within and between repeated DSPI measurements as well as between the DSPI measurements and FEA results. We show that our approach provides a much more comprehensive and accurate validation than traditional methods. The measurement repeatability and the correspondence between measured and predicted strains vary to a great degree within and between measurement areas. The two models used in this study predict the measured strain directions and magnitudes surprisingly well considering that homogeneous and isotropic mechanical properties were assigned to the models. However, the full-field comparisons also reveal some discrepancies between measured and predicted strains that are most probably caused by inaccuracies in the models' geometries and the degree of simplification of the modelled material properties.",
keywords = "bite force, computer simulation, dental stress analysis, elastic modulus, finite element analysis, humans, mandible, models, biological, reproducibility of results, sensitivity and specificity",
author = "F Gr{\"o}ning and Bright, {J A} and Fagan, {M J} and P O'Higgins",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.009",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "1498--1506",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the validation of finite element models with quantitative full-field strain comparisons

AU - Gröning, F

AU - Bright, J A

AU - Fagan, M J

AU - O'Higgins, P

N1 - Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2012/5/11

Y1 - 2012/5/11

N2 - The techniques used to validate finite element (FE) models against experimental results have changed little during the last decades, even though the traditional approach of using single point measurements from strain gauges has major limitations: the strain distribution across the surface is not captured and the accurate determination of strain gauge positions on the model surface is difficult if the 3D surface topography of the bone surface is not measured. The full-field strain measurement technique of digital speckle pattern interferometry (DSPI) can overcome these problems, but the potential of this technique has not yet been fully exploited in validation studies. Here we explore new ways of quantifying and visualising the variation in strain magnitudes and orientations within and between repeated DSPI measurements as well as between the DSPI measurements and FEA results. We show that our approach provides a much more comprehensive and accurate validation than traditional methods. The measurement repeatability and the correspondence between measured and predicted strains vary to a great degree within and between measurement areas. The two models used in this study predict the measured strain directions and magnitudes surprisingly well considering that homogeneous and isotropic mechanical properties were assigned to the models. However, the full-field comparisons also reveal some discrepancies between measured and predicted strains that are most probably caused by inaccuracies in the models' geometries and the degree of simplification of the modelled material properties.

AB - The techniques used to validate finite element (FE) models against experimental results have changed little during the last decades, even though the traditional approach of using single point measurements from strain gauges has major limitations: the strain distribution across the surface is not captured and the accurate determination of strain gauge positions on the model surface is difficult if the 3D surface topography of the bone surface is not measured. The full-field strain measurement technique of digital speckle pattern interferometry (DSPI) can overcome these problems, but the potential of this technique has not yet been fully exploited in validation studies. Here we explore new ways of quantifying and visualising the variation in strain magnitudes and orientations within and between repeated DSPI measurements as well as between the DSPI measurements and FEA results. We show that our approach provides a much more comprehensive and accurate validation than traditional methods. The measurement repeatability and the correspondence between measured and predicted strains vary to a great degree within and between measurement areas. The two models used in this study predict the measured strain directions and magnitudes surprisingly well considering that homogeneous and isotropic mechanical properties were assigned to the models. However, the full-field comparisons also reveal some discrepancies between measured and predicted strains that are most probably caused by inaccuracies in the models' geometries and the degree of simplification of the modelled material properties.

KW - bite force

KW - computer simulation

KW - dental stress analysis

KW - elastic modulus

KW - finite element analysis

KW - humans

KW - mandible

KW - models, biological

KW - reproducibility of results

KW - sensitivity and specificity

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.009

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 1498

EP - 1506

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 8

ER -