In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: trainees' worst and most memorable experiences

P K Myint, C A Rivas, L K Bowker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To examine the personal experiences of higher specialist trainees in Geriatric Medicine (GM) with regard to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) decision making.

SETTING: UK.

PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-five higher trainee members of the British Geriatrics Society (BGS) at the Specialist Registrar (SpR) level.

DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.

METHODS: We distributed a questionnaire examining the various issues around DNAR decision making among the trainee members of the BGS in November 2003. In one of the questions, we asked the participants, 'Briefly describe your worst or most memorable experience of DNAR'. Responses to this question were analysed by thematic schema and are presented.

RESULTS: Overall the response rate was 62% (251/408) after second mailing and 235 of these were at SpR grade. One hundred and ninety-eight participants provided an answer to the above question, providing diverse and often detailed accounts, most of which were negative experiences and which appeared to have had a powerful influence on their ongoing clinical practice. The emerging themes demonstrated areas of conflict between trainees and other doctors as well as patients and relatives.

CONCLUSION: SpR grade geriatricians are exposed to extreme and varied experiences of DNAR decision making in the UK. Efforts to improve support and training in this area should embrace the complexity of the subject.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)865-873
Number of pages9
JournalQJM
Volume103
Issue number11
Early online date24 Jul 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Resuscitation Orders
Decision Making
Geriatrics
Training Support
Resuscitation
Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • adolescent
  • adult
  • age factors
  • aged
  • aged, 80 and over
  • attitude of health personnel
  • cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • decision making
  • education, medical, graduate
  • female
  • geriatrics
  • Great Britain
  • humans
  • male
  • middle aged
  • practice guidelines as topic
  • quality of life
  • resuscitation orders
  • surveys and questionnaires
  • young adult

Cite this

In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation : trainees' worst and most memorable experiences. / Myint, P K; Rivas, C A; Bowker, L K.

In: QJM, Vol. 103, No. 11, 11.2010, p. 865-873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Myint, P K ; Rivas, C A ; Bowker, L K. / In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation : trainees' worst and most memorable experiences. In: QJM. 2010 ; Vol. 103, No. 11. pp. 865-873.
@article{2ec500303a124b8da1de7baa0f9da236,
title = "In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: trainees' worst and most memorable experiences",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To examine the personal experiences of higher specialist trainees in Geriatric Medicine (GM) with regard to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) decision making.SETTING: UK.PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-five higher trainee members of the British Geriatrics Society (BGS) at the Specialist Registrar (SpR) level.DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.METHODS: We distributed a questionnaire examining the various issues around DNAR decision making among the trainee members of the BGS in November 2003. In one of the questions, we asked the participants, 'Briefly describe your worst or most memorable experience of DNAR'. Responses to this question were analysed by thematic schema and are presented.RESULTS: Overall the response rate was 62{\%} (251/408) after second mailing and 235 of these were at SpR grade. One hundred and ninety-eight participants provided an answer to the above question, providing diverse and often detailed accounts, most of which were negative experiences and which appeared to have had a powerful influence on their ongoing clinical practice. The emerging themes demonstrated areas of conflict between trainees and other doctors as well as patients and relatives.CONCLUSION: SpR grade geriatricians are exposed to extreme and varied experiences of DNAR decision making in the UK. Efforts to improve support and training in this area should embrace the complexity of the subject.",
keywords = "adolescent, adult, age factors, aged, aged, 80 and over, attitude of health personnel, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, decision making, education, medical, graduate, female, geriatrics, Great Britain, humans, male, middle aged, practice guidelines as topic, quality of life, resuscitation orders, surveys and questionnaires, young adult",
author = "Myint, {P K} and Rivas, {C A} and Bowker, {L K}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/qjmed/hcq129",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "865--873",
journal = "QJM",
issn = "1460-2725",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

T2 - trainees' worst and most memorable experiences

AU - Myint, P K

AU - Rivas, C A

AU - Bowker, L K

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: To examine the personal experiences of higher specialist trainees in Geriatric Medicine (GM) with regard to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) decision making.SETTING: UK.PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-five higher trainee members of the British Geriatrics Society (BGS) at the Specialist Registrar (SpR) level.DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.METHODS: We distributed a questionnaire examining the various issues around DNAR decision making among the trainee members of the BGS in November 2003. In one of the questions, we asked the participants, 'Briefly describe your worst or most memorable experience of DNAR'. Responses to this question were analysed by thematic schema and are presented.RESULTS: Overall the response rate was 62% (251/408) after second mailing and 235 of these were at SpR grade. One hundred and ninety-eight participants provided an answer to the above question, providing diverse and often detailed accounts, most of which were negative experiences and which appeared to have had a powerful influence on their ongoing clinical practice. The emerging themes demonstrated areas of conflict between trainees and other doctors as well as patients and relatives.CONCLUSION: SpR grade geriatricians are exposed to extreme and varied experiences of DNAR decision making in the UK. Efforts to improve support and training in this area should embrace the complexity of the subject.

AB - BACKGROUND: To examine the personal experiences of higher specialist trainees in Geriatric Medicine (GM) with regard to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and do not attempt resuscitation (DNAR) decision making.SETTING: UK.PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty-five higher trainee members of the British Geriatrics Society (BGS) at the Specialist Registrar (SpR) level.DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey.METHODS: We distributed a questionnaire examining the various issues around DNAR decision making among the trainee members of the BGS in November 2003. In one of the questions, we asked the participants, 'Briefly describe your worst or most memorable experience of DNAR'. Responses to this question were analysed by thematic schema and are presented.RESULTS: Overall the response rate was 62% (251/408) after second mailing and 235 of these were at SpR grade. One hundred and ninety-eight participants provided an answer to the above question, providing diverse and often detailed accounts, most of which were negative experiences and which appeared to have had a powerful influence on their ongoing clinical practice. The emerging themes demonstrated areas of conflict between trainees and other doctors as well as patients and relatives.CONCLUSION: SpR grade geriatricians are exposed to extreme and varied experiences of DNAR decision making in the UK. Efforts to improve support and training in this area should embrace the complexity of the subject.

KW - adolescent

KW - adult

KW - age factors

KW - aged

KW - aged, 80 and over

KW - attitude of health personnel

KW - cardiopulmonary resuscitation

KW - decision making

KW - education, medical, graduate

KW - female

KW - geriatrics

KW - Great Britain

KW - humans

KW - male

KW - middle aged

KW - practice guidelines as topic

KW - quality of life

KW - resuscitation orders

KW - surveys and questionnaires

KW - young adult

U2 - 10.1093/qjmed/hcq129

DO - 10.1093/qjmed/hcq129

M3 - Article

C2 - 20657023

VL - 103

SP - 865

EP - 873

JO - QJM

JF - QJM

SN - 1460-2725

IS - 11

ER -