Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?

Marta Szulkin, Katie V. Stopher, Josephine M. Pemberton, Jane M. Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Animal ecologists commonly assume that the reduced fitness that often afflicts inbred offspring will inevitably cause selection for inbreeding avoidance. Although early empirical studies often reported inbreeding avoidance, recent studies suggest that animals sometimes show no avoidance or even prefer to mate with relatives. However, current theory is insufficient to predict whether animals should avoid, tolerate, or prefer inbreeding and hence to understand overall inbreeding strategy. Furthermore, quantifying inbreeding strategy is challenging, requiring relatedness among unbiased sets of actual and potential mates to be accurately estimated. Here, we highlight key limitations of current theory and empirical tests, and summarise the advances required to predict, quantify, and understand animal inbreeding strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-211
Number of pages7
JournalTrends in Ecology & Evolution
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date24 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

inbreeding avoidance
animal preferences
inbreeding
tolerance
animal
animals
relatedness
fitness
ecologists

Keywords

  • inbreeding avoidance
  • inbreeding preference
  • inbreeding strategy
  • inclusive fitness
  • mate choice
  • relatedness

Cite this

Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals? / Szulkin, Marta; Stopher, Katie V.; Pemberton, Josephine M.; Reid, Jane M.

In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 28, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 205-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Szulkin, Marta ; Stopher, Katie V. ; Pemberton, Josephine M. ; Reid, Jane M. / Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?. In: Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 205-211.
@article{0bff1e137ad54c25a9423c873afc973d,
title = "Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?",
abstract = "Animal ecologists commonly assume that the reduced fitness that often afflicts inbred offspring will inevitably cause selection for inbreeding avoidance. Although early empirical studies often reported inbreeding avoidance, recent studies suggest that animals sometimes show no avoidance or even prefer to mate with relatives. However, current theory is insufficient to predict whether animals should avoid, tolerate, or prefer inbreeding and hence to understand overall inbreeding strategy. Furthermore, quantifying inbreeding strategy is challenging, requiring relatedness among unbiased sets of actual and potential mates to be accurately estimated. Here, we highlight key limitations of current theory and empirical tests, and summarise the advances required to predict, quantify, and understand animal inbreeding strategies.",
keywords = "inbreeding avoidance, inbreeding preference, inbreeding strategy, inclusive fitness, mate choice, relatedness",
author = "Marta Szulkin and Stopher, {Katie V.} and Pemberton, {Josephine M.} and Reid, {Jane M.}",
note = "We thank Magdalen College, Oxford and an IEF Marie Curie Fellowship (M.S.), NERC (K.V.S.), the Royal Society (J.M.R.), and the ERC (J.M.P.) for funding and Deborah Charlesworth, Lukas Keller Ashleigh Griffin, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.016",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "205--211",
journal = "Trends in Ecology & Evolution",
issn = "0169-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals?

AU - Szulkin, Marta

AU - Stopher, Katie V.

AU - Pemberton, Josephine M.

AU - Reid, Jane M.

N1 - We thank Magdalen College, Oxford and an IEF Marie Curie Fellowship (M.S.), NERC (K.V.S.), the Royal Society (J.M.R.), and the ERC (J.M.P.) for funding and Deborah Charlesworth, Lukas Keller Ashleigh Griffin, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Animal ecologists commonly assume that the reduced fitness that often afflicts inbred offspring will inevitably cause selection for inbreeding avoidance. Although early empirical studies often reported inbreeding avoidance, recent studies suggest that animals sometimes show no avoidance or even prefer to mate with relatives. However, current theory is insufficient to predict whether animals should avoid, tolerate, or prefer inbreeding and hence to understand overall inbreeding strategy. Furthermore, quantifying inbreeding strategy is challenging, requiring relatedness among unbiased sets of actual and potential mates to be accurately estimated. Here, we highlight key limitations of current theory and empirical tests, and summarise the advances required to predict, quantify, and understand animal inbreeding strategies.

AB - Animal ecologists commonly assume that the reduced fitness that often afflicts inbred offspring will inevitably cause selection for inbreeding avoidance. Although early empirical studies often reported inbreeding avoidance, recent studies suggest that animals sometimes show no avoidance or even prefer to mate with relatives. However, current theory is insufficient to predict whether animals should avoid, tolerate, or prefer inbreeding and hence to understand overall inbreeding strategy. Furthermore, quantifying inbreeding strategy is challenging, requiring relatedness among unbiased sets of actual and potential mates to be accurately estimated. Here, we highlight key limitations of current theory and empirical tests, and summarise the advances required to predict, quantify, and understand animal inbreeding strategies.

KW - inbreeding avoidance

KW - inbreeding preference

KW - inbreeding strategy

KW - inclusive fitness

KW - mate choice

KW - relatedness

U2 - 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.016

DO - 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.016

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 28

SP - 205

EP - 211

JO - Trends in Ecology & Evolution

JF - Trends in Ecology & Evolution

SN - 0169-5347

IS - 4

ER -