Inbreeding parents should invest more resources in fewer offspring

A. Bradley Duthie, Aline M. Lee, Jane M. Reid

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Inbreeding increases parent-offspring relatedness and commonly reduces offspring viability, shaping selection on reproductive interactions involving relatives and associated parental investment (PI). Nevertheless, theories predicting selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance and selection for optimal PI have only been considered separately, precluding prediction of optimal PI and associated reproductive strategy given inbreeding. We unify inbreeding and PI theory, demonstrating that optimal PI increases when a female's inbreeding decreases the viability of her offspring. Inbreeding females should therefore produce fewer offspring due to the fundamental trade-off between offspring number and PI. Accordingly, selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance changes when females can adjust PI with the degree that they inbreed. In contrast, optimal PI does not depend on whether a focal female is herself inbred. However, inbreeding causes optimal PI to increase given strict monogamy and associated biparental investment compared to female-only investment. Our model implies that understanding evolutionary dynamics of inbreeding strategy, inbreeding depression, and PI requires joint consideration of the expression of each in relation to the other. Overall, we demonstrate that existing PI and inbreeding theories represent special cases of a more general theory, implying that intrinsic links between inbreeding and PI affect evolution of behaviour and intra-familial conflict.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20161845
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
Volume283
Issue number1843
Early online date23 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

parental investment
Inbreeding
inbreeding
resource
inbreeding avoidance
viability
monogamy
inbreeding depression
relatedness
reproductive strategy
trade-off

Keywords

  • inbreeding
  • inclusive fitness
  • mate choice
  • parental investment
  • relatedness
  • reproductive strategy

Cite this

Inbreeding parents should invest more resources in fewer offspring. / Duthie, A. Bradley; Lee, Aline M.; Reid, Jane M.

In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 283, No. 1843, 20161845, 30.11.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1c799471feaf47a79fa393ad2ce005bd,
title = "Inbreeding parents should invest more resources in fewer offspring",
abstract = "Inbreeding increases parent-offspring relatedness and commonly reduces offspring viability, shaping selection on reproductive interactions involving relatives and associated parental investment (PI). Nevertheless, theories predicting selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance and selection for optimal PI have only been considered separately, precluding prediction of optimal PI and associated reproductive strategy given inbreeding. We unify inbreeding and PI theory, demonstrating that optimal PI increases when a female's inbreeding decreases the viability of her offspring. Inbreeding females should therefore produce fewer offspring due to the fundamental trade-off between offspring number and PI. Accordingly, selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance changes when females can adjust PI with the degree that they inbreed. In contrast, optimal PI does not depend on whether a focal female is herself inbred. However, inbreeding causes optimal PI to increase given strict monogamy and associated biparental investment compared to female-only investment. Our model implies that understanding evolutionary dynamics of inbreeding strategy, inbreeding depression, and PI requires joint consideration of the expression of each in relation to the other. Overall, we demonstrate that existing PI and inbreeding theories represent special cases of a more general theory, implying that intrinsic links between inbreeding and PI affect evolution of behaviour and intra-familial conflict.",
keywords = "inbreeding, inclusive fitness, mate choice, parental investment, relatedness, reproductive strategy",
author = "Duthie, {A. Bradley} and Lee, {Aline M.} and Reid, {Jane M.}",
note = "This work was funded by a European Research Council Starting Grant to J.M.R",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1098/rspb.2016.1845",
language = "English",
volume = "283",
journal = "Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8452",
publisher = "ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY",
number = "1843",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inbreeding parents should invest more resources in fewer offspring

AU - Duthie, A. Bradley

AU - Lee, Aline M.

AU - Reid, Jane M.

N1 - This work was funded by a European Research Council Starting Grant to J.M.R

PY - 2016/11/30

Y1 - 2016/11/30

N2 - Inbreeding increases parent-offspring relatedness and commonly reduces offspring viability, shaping selection on reproductive interactions involving relatives and associated parental investment (PI). Nevertheless, theories predicting selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance and selection for optimal PI have only been considered separately, precluding prediction of optimal PI and associated reproductive strategy given inbreeding. We unify inbreeding and PI theory, demonstrating that optimal PI increases when a female's inbreeding decreases the viability of her offspring. Inbreeding females should therefore produce fewer offspring due to the fundamental trade-off between offspring number and PI. Accordingly, selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance changes when females can adjust PI with the degree that they inbreed. In contrast, optimal PI does not depend on whether a focal female is herself inbred. However, inbreeding causes optimal PI to increase given strict monogamy and associated biparental investment compared to female-only investment. Our model implies that understanding evolutionary dynamics of inbreeding strategy, inbreeding depression, and PI requires joint consideration of the expression of each in relation to the other. Overall, we demonstrate that existing PI and inbreeding theories represent special cases of a more general theory, implying that intrinsic links between inbreeding and PI affect evolution of behaviour and intra-familial conflict.

AB - Inbreeding increases parent-offspring relatedness and commonly reduces offspring viability, shaping selection on reproductive interactions involving relatives and associated parental investment (PI). Nevertheless, theories predicting selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance and selection for optimal PI have only been considered separately, precluding prediction of optimal PI and associated reproductive strategy given inbreeding. We unify inbreeding and PI theory, demonstrating that optimal PI increases when a female's inbreeding decreases the viability of her offspring. Inbreeding females should therefore produce fewer offspring due to the fundamental trade-off between offspring number and PI. Accordingly, selection for inbreeding versus inbreeding avoidance changes when females can adjust PI with the degree that they inbreed. In contrast, optimal PI does not depend on whether a focal female is herself inbred. However, inbreeding causes optimal PI to increase given strict monogamy and associated biparental investment compared to female-only investment. Our model implies that understanding evolutionary dynamics of inbreeding strategy, inbreeding depression, and PI requires joint consideration of the expression of each in relation to the other. Overall, we demonstrate that existing PI and inbreeding theories represent special cases of a more general theory, implying that intrinsic links between inbreeding and PI affect evolution of behaviour and intra-familial conflict.

KW - inbreeding

KW - inclusive fitness

KW - mate choice

KW - parental investment

KW - relatedness

KW - reproductive strategy

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2016.1845

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2016.1845

M3 - Article

VL - 283

JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences

JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8452

IS - 1843

M1 - 20161845

ER -