Income Inequality in Advanced Capitalism

How Protective Institutions can Promote Egalitarian Societies

Christopher Kollmeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study develops a Polanyian perspective on income inequality in advanced capitalist countries. Polanyi’s historical account of the rise and fall of classic liberalism in Britain illustrated how social groups and society at large devised “protective institutions” to shield themselves from socially destructive market forces. Recent qualitative applications of this idea identify three protective institutions as being the most important – the public sector economy, trade unions, and the family. Using data from 16 Western countries from 1970 to 2010, this study demonstrates that cross-national and temporal variations in these protective institutions explain a considerable amount of the observed patterns of income inequality among these countries, helping to explain why some countries have recently experienced rising inequality but others have not. The study ends by arguing that a Polanyian perspective provides more analytical and theoretical leverage than other sociological approaches to understanding income inequality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-444
Number of pages25
JournalComparative Sociology
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

capitalist society
income
society
difference in income
trade union
liberalism
public sector
economy
market
Society

Keywords

  • protective institutions
  • income inequality
  • the great U-turn
  • Karl Polanyi
  • economic sociology

Cite this

Income Inequality in Advanced Capitalism : How Protective Institutions can Promote Egalitarian Societies. / Kollmeyer, Christopher.

In: Comparative Sociology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2014, p. 419-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b974c57e6002491a9e0aaa58fb70c535,
title = "Income Inequality in Advanced Capitalism: How Protective Institutions can Promote Egalitarian Societies",
abstract = "This study develops a Polanyian perspective on income inequality in advanced capitalist countries. Polanyi’s historical account of the rise and fall of classic liberalism in Britain illustrated how social groups and society at large devised “protective institutions” to shield themselves from socially destructive market forces. Recent qualitative applications of this idea identify three protective institutions as being the most important – the public sector economy, trade unions, and the family. Using data from 16 Western countries from 1970 to 2010, this study demonstrates that cross-national and temporal variations in these protective institutions explain a considerable amount of the observed patterns of income inequality among these countries, helping to explain why some countries have recently experienced rising inequality but others have not. The study ends by arguing that a Polanyian perspective provides more analytical and theoretical leverage than other sociological approaches to understanding income inequality.",
keywords = "protective institutions, income inequality, the great U-turn, Karl Polanyi, economic sociology",
author = "Christopher Kollmeyer",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1163/15691330-12341317",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "419--444",
journal = "Comparative Sociology",
issn = "1569-1322",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Income Inequality in Advanced Capitalism

T2 - How Protective Institutions can Promote Egalitarian Societies

AU - Kollmeyer, Christopher

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This study develops a Polanyian perspective on income inequality in advanced capitalist countries. Polanyi’s historical account of the rise and fall of classic liberalism in Britain illustrated how social groups and society at large devised “protective institutions” to shield themselves from socially destructive market forces. Recent qualitative applications of this idea identify three protective institutions as being the most important – the public sector economy, trade unions, and the family. Using data from 16 Western countries from 1970 to 2010, this study demonstrates that cross-national and temporal variations in these protective institutions explain a considerable amount of the observed patterns of income inequality among these countries, helping to explain why some countries have recently experienced rising inequality but others have not. The study ends by arguing that a Polanyian perspective provides more analytical and theoretical leverage than other sociological approaches to understanding income inequality.

AB - This study develops a Polanyian perspective on income inequality in advanced capitalist countries. Polanyi’s historical account of the rise and fall of classic liberalism in Britain illustrated how social groups and society at large devised “protective institutions” to shield themselves from socially destructive market forces. Recent qualitative applications of this idea identify three protective institutions as being the most important – the public sector economy, trade unions, and the family. Using data from 16 Western countries from 1970 to 2010, this study demonstrates that cross-national and temporal variations in these protective institutions explain a considerable amount of the observed patterns of income inequality among these countries, helping to explain why some countries have recently experienced rising inequality but others have not. The study ends by arguing that a Polanyian perspective provides more analytical and theoretical leverage than other sociological approaches to understanding income inequality.

KW - protective institutions

KW - income inequality

KW - the great U-turn

KW - Karl Polanyi

KW - economic sociology

U2 - 10.1163/15691330-12341317

DO - 10.1163/15691330-12341317

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 419

EP - 444

JO - Comparative Sociology

JF - Comparative Sociology

SN - 1569-1322

IS - 4

ER -