Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials

Missing forms

D. Curran* (Corresponding Author), G. Molenberghs, P. M. Fayers, D. Machin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analysing quality of life (QOL) data may be complicated for several reasons, such as: repeated measures are obtained; data may be collected on ordered categorical responses; the instrument may have multidimensional scales, and complete data may not be available for all patients. In addition, it may be necessary to integrate QOL with length of life. The major undesirable effects of missing data, in QOL research, are the introduction of biases due to inadequate modes of analysis and the loss of efficiency due to reduced sample sizes. Currently, there is no standard method for handling missing data in QOL studies. In fact, there are very few references to methods of handling missing data in this context. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of methods for analysing incomplete longitudinal QOL data which have either been presented in the QOL literature or in the missing data literature. These methods of analysis include complete case, available case, summary measures, imputation and likelihood-based approaches. We also discuss the issue of bias and the need for sensitivity analyses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)697-709
Number of pages13
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume17
Issue number5-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Mar 1998

Fingerprint

Randomized Trial
Quality of Life
Missing Data
Repeated Measures
Imputation
Categorical
Sample Size
Form
Likelihood
Integrate
Necessary
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials : Missing forms. / Curran, D. (Corresponding Author); Molenberghs, G.; Fayers, P. M.; Machin, D.

In: Statistics in Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 5-7, 15.03.1998, p. 697-709.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curran, D. ; Molenberghs, G. ; Fayers, P. M. ; Machin, D. / Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials : Missing forms. In: Statistics in Medicine. 1998 ; Vol. 17, No. 5-7. pp. 697-709.
@article{f1cbdab2fb3846588961705f8cb4fa99,
title = "Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials: Missing forms",
abstract = "Analysing quality of life (QOL) data may be complicated for several reasons, such as: repeated measures are obtained; data may be collected on ordered categorical responses; the instrument may have multidimensional scales, and complete data may not be available for all patients. In addition, it may be necessary to integrate QOL with length of life. The major undesirable effects of missing data, in QOL research, are the introduction of biases due to inadequate modes of analysis and the loss of efficiency due to reduced sample sizes. Currently, there is no standard method for handling missing data in QOL studies. In fact, there are very few references to methods of handling missing data in this context. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of methods for analysing incomplete longitudinal QOL data which have either been presented in the QOL literature or in the missing data literature. These methods of analysis include complete case, available case, summary measures, imputation and likelihood-based approaches. We also discuss the issue of bias and the need for sensitivity analyses.",
author = "D. Curran and G. Molenberghs and Fayers, {P. M.} and D. Machin",
year = "1998",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<697::AID-SIM815>3.0.CO;2-Y",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "697--709",
journal = "Statistics in Medicine",
issn = "0277-6715",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5-7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials

T2 - Missing forms

AU - Curran, D.

AU - Molenberghs, G.

AU - Fayers, P. M.

AU - Machin, D.

PY - 1998/3/15

Y1 - 1998/3/15

N2 - Analysing quality of life (QOL) data may be complicated for several reasons, such as: repeated measures are obtained; data may be collected on ordered categorical responses; the instrument may have multidimensional scales, and complete data may not be available for all patients. In addition, it may be necessary to integrate QOL with length of life. The major undesirable effects of missing data, in QOL research, are the introduction of biases due to inadequate modes of analysis and the loss of efficiency due to reduced sample sizes. Currently, there is no standard method for handling missing data in QOL studies. In fact, there are very few references to methods of handling missing data in this context. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of methods for analysing incomplete longitudinal QOL data which have either been presented in the QOL literature or in the missing data literature. These methods of analysis include complete case, available case, summary measures, imputation and likelihood-based approaches. We also discuss the issue of bias and the need for sensitivity analyses.

AB - Analysing quality of life (QOL) data may be complicated for several reasons, such as: repeated measures are obtained; data may be collected on ordered categorical responses; the instrument may have multidimensional scales, and complete data may not be available for all patients. In addition, it may be necessary to integrate QOL with length of life. The major undesirable effects of missing data, in QOL research, are the introduction of biases due to inadequate modes of analysis and the loss of efficiency due to reduced sample sizes. Currently, there is no standard method for handling missing data in QOL studies. In fact, there are very few references to methods of handling missing data in this context. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of methods for analysing incomplete longitudinal QOL data which have either been presented in the QOL literature or in the missing data literature. These methods of analysis include complete case, available case, summary measures, imputation and likelihood-based approaches. We also discuss the issue of bias and the need for sensitivity analyses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642705010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<697::AID-SIM815>3.0.CO;2-Y

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980315/15)17:5/7<697::AID-SIM815>3.0.CO;2-Y

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 697

EP - 709

JO - Statistics in Medicine

JF - Statistics in Medicine

SN - 0277-6715

IS - 5-7

ER -