TY - JOUR
T1 - Increased Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroid versus Add-On Long-acting β-Agonist for Step-Up Therapy in Asthma
AU - Israel, Elliot
AU - Roche, Nicolas
AU - Martin, Richard J
AU - Colice, Gene
AU - Dorinsky, Paul M
AU - Postma, Dirkje S
AU - Guilbert, Theresa W
AU - van Aalderen, Willem Mc
AU - Grigg, Jonathan
AU - Hillyer, Elizabeth V
AU - Burden, Anne
AU - von Ziegenweidt, Julie
AU - Thomas, Victoria
AU - Price, David B.
N1 -
Copyright © 2015 by the American Thoracic Society
Supported by an unrestricted grant from Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited (Petach Tikva, Israel) (data acquisition and analyses). Access to data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database was co-funded by Research in Real-Life Ltd (RiRL). Data were collected and analyzed by the authors in the research team at RiRL, and the first draft of the manuscript was written by one of the authors. Teva played no role in study conduct or analysis and did not modify or approve the manuscript.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - RATIONALE: Guidelines advocate adding long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as the preferred step-up therapy to increasing inhaled corticosteroid dose for patients with uncontrolled asthma on inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy. However, <5% of patients with asthma qualify for the randomized controlled trials on which guidelines are based. Thus, real-world data are needed to complement results of randomized trials with narrow entry criteria.OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of stepping up asthma therapy with an increased dose of different types of inhaled corticosteroid as compared with add-on LABA.METHODS: We performed a historical matched cohort study utilizing large primary care databases to compare asthma step-up therapy with small- and standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid vs. added LABA for patients 12-80 years old. As outcomes, we examined a composite of asthma control and rates of severe exacerbations.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The odds of asthma control and rates of severe exacerbations over 1 outcome year were comparable with increased inhaled corticosteroid dose vs. added LABA. The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for achieving asthma control with increased inhaled corticosteroid dose vs inhaled corticosteroid/LABA were 0.99 (0.88-1.12) for small-particle inhaled corticosteroid (n=3036 per cohort) and 0.85 (0.67-1.07) for standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid (n=809 per cohort). The adjusted rate ratios (95% CI) for severe exacerbations, compared with inhaled corticosteroid/LABA combination inhaler, were 1.04 (0.91-1.20) and 1.18 (0.92-1.54), respectively. The results were not affected by smoking status.CONCLUSIONS: When applied to a broad primary care population, anti-inflammatory therapy utilizing increased doses of small- or standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid is as effective as adding LABA, as measured by outcomes important to both patients and providers. Real-world populations and outcomes need to be taken into consideration when formulating treatment recommendations.
AB - RATIONALE: Guidelines advocate adding long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) as the preferred step-up therapy to increasing inhaled corticosteroid dose for patients with uncontrolled asthma on inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy. However, <5% of patients with asthma qualify for the randomized controlled trials on which guidelines are based. Thus, real-world data are needed to complement results of randomized trials with narrow entry criteria.OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of stepping up asthma therapy with an increased dose of different types of inhaled corticosteroid as compared with add-on LABA.METHODS: We performed a historical matched cohort study utilizing large primary care databases to compare asthma step-up therapy with small- and standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid vs. added LABA for patients 12-80 years old. As outcomes, we examined a composite of asthma control and rates of severe exacerbations.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The odds of asthma control and rates of severe exacerbations over 1 outcome year were comparable with increased inhaled corticosteroid dose vs. added LABA. The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for achieving asthma control with increased inhaled corticosteroid dose vs inhaled corticosteroid/LABA were 0.99 (0.88-1.12) for small-particle inhaled corticosteroid (n=3036 per cohort) and 0.85 (0.67-1.07) for standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid (n=809 per cohort). The adjusted rate ratios (95% CI) for severe exacerbations, compared with inhaled corticosteroid/LABA combination inhaler, were 1.04 (0.91-1.20) and 1.18 (0.92-1.54), respectively. The results were not affected by smoking status.CONCLUSIONS: When applied to a broad primary care population, anti-inflammatory therapy utilizing increased doses of small- or standard size-particle inhaled corticosteroid is as effective as adding LABA, as measured by outcomes important to both patients and providers. Real-world populations and outcomes need to be taken into consideration when formulating treatment recommendations.
KW - adrenergic β2-agonists
KW - antiasthmatic agents
KW - bronchodilator agents
KW - disease exacerbation
KW - glucocorticoids
U2 - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201412-580OC
DO - 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201412-580OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 25756308
VL - 12
SP - 798
EP - 806
JO - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
JF - Annals of the American Thoracic Society
SN - 2325-6621
IS - 6
ER -