Increasing delirium skills at the front door: results from a repeated survey on delirium knowledge and attitudes

Rodric Peter Llewelyn Jenkin, Adam Al-Attar, Sarah Richardson, Phyo Kyaw Myint, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Daniel H J Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: delirium is under-recognised in comparison to other common and serious acute disorders. A 2006 survey of UK junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) identified poor knowledge of the diagnostic criteria and treatment of delirium. We hypothesised that increased prominence accorded to delirium in the form of national initiatives and guidelines may have had an impact on understanding among junior doctors.

OBJECTIVE: we repeated a multi-centre survey of knowledge of and attitudes to delirium in junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) assessing unselected acute medical presentations (the 'medical take').

DESIGN: questionnaire-based survey in 48 acute hospitals in UK and Ireland.

METHODS: we used questionnaires designed to test understanding of delirium, including prevalence, knowledge of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, use of specific screening tools, association with adverse outcomes and pharmacological management.

RESULTS: one thousand two hundred and fifteen trainee physicians participated. Compared with the 2006 cohort, improvements were seen in 9 of 17 knowledge-based questions and overall score improved in the 2013 cohort. Nonetheless, significant deficits in knowledge, particularly for the diagnostic criteria for delirium, remained.

CONCLUSIONS: despite improvements in some aspects of delirium knowledge, the diagnostic criteria for delirium remain poorly understood. Challenges remain in ensuring adequate training for junior doctors in delirium.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)517-522
Number of pages6
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume45
Issue number4
Early online date26 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Delirium
Surveys and Questionnaires
Ireland
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Pharmacology
Guidelines
Physicians

Keywords

  • delirium
  • survey
  • geriatric medicine

Cite this

Increasing delirium skills at the front door : results from a repeated survey on delirium knowledge and attitudes. / Jenkin, Rodric Peter Llewelyn; Al-Attar, Adam; Richardson, Sarah; Myint, Phyo Kyaw; MacLullich, Alasdair M J; Davis, Daniel H J.

In: Age and Ageing, Vol. 45, No. 4, 07.2016, p. 517-522.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jenkin, Rodric Peter Llewelyn ; Al-Attar, Adam ; Richardson, Sarah ; Myint, Phyo Kyaw ; MacLullich, Alasdair M J ; Davis, Daniel H J. / Increasing delirium skills at the front door : results from a repeated survey on delirium knowledge and attitudes. In: Age and Ageing. 2016 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 517-522.
@article{3aca081318f9404dbf44e4ef529b8992,
title = "Increasing delirium skills at the front door: results from a repeated survey on delirium knowledge and attitudes",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: delirium is under-recognised in comparison to other common and serious acute disorders. A 2006 survey of UK junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) identified poor knowledge of the diagnostic criteria and treatment of delirium. We hypothesised that increased prominence accorded to delirium in the form of national initiatives and guidelines may have had an impact on understanding among junior doctors.OBJECTIVE: we repeated a multi-centre survey of knowledge of and attitudes to delirium in junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) assessing unselected acute medical presentations (the 'medical take').DESIGN: questionnaire-based survey in 48 acute hospitals in UK and Ireland.METHODS: we used questionnaires designed to test understanding of delirium, including prevalence, knowledge of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, use of specific screening tools, association with adverse outcomes and pharmacological management.RESULTS: one thousand two hundred and fifteen trainee physicians participated. Compared with the 2006 cohort, improvements were seen in 9 of 17 knowledge-based questions and overall score improved in the 2013 cohort. Nonetheless, significant deficits in knowledge, particularly for the diagnostic criteria for delirium, remained.CONCLUSIONS: despite improvements in some aspects of delirium knowledge, the diagnostic criteria for delirium remain poorly understood. Challenges remain in ensuring adequate training for junior doctors in delirium.",
keywords = "delirium, survey, geriatric medicine",
author = "Jenkin, {Rodric Peter Llewelyn} and Adam Al-Attar and Sarah Richardson and Myint, {Phyo Kyaw} and MacLullich, {Alasdair M J} and Davis, {Daniel H J}",
note = "{\circledC} The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/ageing/afw066",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "517--522",
journal = "Age and Ageing",
issn = "0002-0729",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increasing delirium skills at the front door

T2 - results from a repeated survey on delirium knowledge and attitudes

AU - Jenkin, Rodric Peter Llewelyn

AU - Al-Attar, Adam

AU - Richardson, Sarah

AU - Myint, Phyo Kyaw

AU - MacLullich, Alasdair M J

AU - Davis, Daniel H J

N1 - © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: delirium is under-recognised in comparison to other common and serious acute disorders. A 2006 survey of UK junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) identified poor knowledge of the diagnostic criteria and treatment of delirium. We hypothesised that increased prominence accorded to delirium in the form of national initiatives and guidelines may have had an impact on understanding among junior doctors.OBJECTIVE: we repeated a multi-centre survey of knowledge of and attitudes to delirium in junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) assessing unselected acute medical presentations (the 'medical take').DESIGN: questionnaire-based survey in 48 acute hospitals in UK and Ireland.METHODS: we used questionnaires designed to test understanding of delirium, including prevalence, knowledge of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, use of specific screening tools, association with adverse outcomes and pharmacological management.RESULTS: one thousand two hundred and fifteen trainee physicians participated. Compared with the 2006 cohort, improvements were seen in 9 of 17 knowledge-based questions and overall score improved in the 2013 cohort. Nonetheless, significant deficits in knowledge, particularly for the diagnostic criteria for delirium, remained.CONCLUSIONS: despite improvements in some aspects of delirium knowledge, the diagnostic criteria for delirium remain poorly understood. Challenges remain in ensuring adequate training for junior doctors in delirium.

AB - BACKGROUND: delirium is under-recognised in comparison to other common and serious acute disorders. A 2006 survey of UK junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) identified poor knowledge of the diagnostic criteria and treatment of delirium. We hypothesised that increased prominence accorded to delirium in the form of national initiatives and guidelines may have had an impact on understanding among junior doctors.OBJECTIVE: we repeated a multi-centre survey of knowledge of and attitudes to delirium in junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) assessing unselected acute medical presentations (the 'medical take').DESIGN: questionnaire-based survey in 48 acute hospitals in UK and Ireland.METHODS: we used questionnaires designed to test understanding of delirium, including prevalence, knowledge of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, use of specific screening tools, association with adverse outcomes and pharmacological management.RESULTS: one thousand two hundred and fifteen trainee physicians participated. Compared with the 2006 cohort, improvements were seen in 9 of 17 knowledge-based questions and overall score improved in the 2013 cohort. Nonetheless, significant deficits in knowledge, particularly for the diagnostic criteria for delirium, remained.CONCLUSIONS: despite improvements in some aspects of delirium knowledge, the diagnostic criteria for delirium remain poorly understood. Challenges remain in ensuring adequate training for junior doctors in delirium.

KW - delirium

KW - survey

KW - geriatric medicine

U2 - 10.1093/ageing/afw066

DO - 10.1093/ageing/afw066

M3 - Article

C2 - 27118700

VL - 45

SP - 517

EP - 522

JO - Age and Ageing

JF - Age and Ageing

SN - 0002-0729

IS - 4

ER -