Individual differences in dominance perception: dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance

Christopher D. Watkins, Benedict C. Jones, Lisa DeBruine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Masculine facial characteristics are associated with indices of men's dominance. Previous research found that shorter men were more likely to attribute high dominance to masculine men, suggesting that dominant men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men than relatively subordinate men are. In the current study, we tested for novel evidence for this hypothesis. We observed a negative correlation between men's own dominance, assessed using the dominance subscale of the international personality items pool, and the extent to which they attributed dominance to masculine male, but not female, faces. Such variation in dominance perception supports the proposal that less dominant men are more sensitive to cues of dominance in other men and may be adaptive if less dominant men incur greater costs if they incorrectly perceive the dominance of male rivals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)967-971
Number of pages5
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Volume49
Issue number8
Early online date30 Aug 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • dominance
  • individual differences
  • international personality items pool
  • facial masculinity
  • within-sex competition
  • rivalry
  • 4th digit ratio
  • voice pitch
  • sexual-dimorphism
  • testosterone responses
  • menstrual-cycle
  • schematic faces
  • masculinity
  • preferences
  • attractiveness
  • appearance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individual differences in dominance perception: dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this