Individual differences in processing resources modulate bimanual interference in pointing

Constanze Hesse, Laura Koroknai, Jutta Billino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Coordinating both hands during bimanual reaching is a complex task that can generate interference during action preparation as often indicated by prolonged reaction times for movements that require moving the two hands at different amplitudes. Individual processing constraints are thought to contribute to this interference effect. Most importantly, however, the amount of interference seems to depend considerably on overall task demands suggesting that interference increases as the available processing resources decrease. Here, we further investigated this idea by comparing performance in a simple direct cueing and a more difficult symbolic cueing task between three groups of participants that supposedly vary in their processing resources, i.e., musicians, young adults and older adults. We found that the size of interference effects during symbolic cueing varied in the tested groups: musicians showed the smallest and older adults the largest interference effects. More importantly, a regression model, using processing speed and processing capacity as predictor variables, revealed a clear link between the available processing resources and the size of the interference effect during symbolic cueing. In the easier direct cueing task, no reliable interference was observed on a group level. We propose that the susceptibility to bimanual interference is modulated by the task-specific processing requirements in relation with the available processing resources of an individual.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPsychological Research
Early online date17 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Individuality
Hand
Young Adult
Resources
Individual Differences
Interference

Cite this

Individual differences in processing resources modulate bimanual interference in pointing. / Hesse, Constanze; Koroknai, Laura; Billino, Jutta.

In: Psychological Research, 17.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{64c60f1b7e8d4724af2bd4e8281d3d4e,
title = "Individual differences in processing resources modulate bimanual interference in pointing",
abstract = "Coordinating both hands during bimanual reaching is a complex task that can generate interference during action preparation as often indicated by prolonged reaction times for movements that require moving the two hands at different amplitudes. Individual processing constraints are thought to contribute to this interference effect. Most importantly, however, the amount of interference seems to depend considerably on overall task demands suggesting that interference increases as the available processing resources decrease. Here, we further investigated this idea by comparing performance in a simple direct cueing and a more difficult symbolic cueing task between three groups of participants that supposedly vary in their processing resources, i.e., musicians, young adults and older adults. We found that the size of interference effects during symbolic cueing varied in the tested groups: musicians showed the smallest and older adults the largest interference effects. More importantly, a regression model, using processing speed and processing capacity as predictor variables, revealed a clear link between the available processing resources and the size of the interference effect during symbolic cueing. In the easier direct cueing task, no reliable interference was observed on a group level. We propose that the susceptibility to bimanual interference is modulated by the task-specific processing requirements in relation with the available processing resources of an individual.",
author = "Constanze Hesse and Laura Koroknai and Jutta Billino",
note = "Open Access via Springer compact agreement FundRef Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant number SFB/TRR 135",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-018-1050-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in processing resources modulate bimanual interference in pointing

AU - Hesse, Constanze

AU - Koroknai, Laura

AU - Billino, Jutta

N1 - Open Access via Springer compact agreement FundRef Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant number SFB/TRR 135

PY - 2018/7/17

Y1 - 2018/7/17

N2 - Coordinating both hands during bimanual reaching is a complex task that can generate interference during action preparation as often indicated by prolonged reaction times for movements that require moving the two hands at different amplitudes. Individual processing constraints are thought to contribute to this interference effect. Most importantly, however, the amount of interference seems to depend considerably on overall task demands suggesting that interference increases as the available processing resources decrease. Here, we further investigated this idea by comparing performance in a simple direct cueing and a more difficult symbolic cueing task between three groups of participants that supposedly vary in their processing resources, i.e., musicians, young adults and older adults. We found that the size of interference effects during symbolic cueing varied in the tested groups: musicians showed the smallest and older adults the largest interference effects. More importantly, a regression model, using processing speed and processing capacity as predictor variables, revealed a clear link between the available processing resources and the size of the interference effect during symbolic cueing. In the easier direct cueing task, no reliable interference was observed on a group level. We propose that the susceptibility to bimanual interference is modulated by the task-specific processing requirements in relation with the available processing resources of an individual.

AB - Coordinating both hands during bimanual reaching is a complex task that can generate interference during action preparation as often indicated by prolonged reaction times for movements that require moving the two hands at different amplitudes. Individual processing constraints are thought to contribute to this interference effect. Most importantly, however, the amount of interference seems to depend considerably on overall task demands suggesting that interference increases as the available processing resources decrease. Here, we further investigated this idea by comparing performance in a simple direct cueing and a more difficult symbolic cueing task between three groups of participants that supposedly vary in their processing resources, i.e., musicians, young adults and older adults. We found that the size of interference effects during symbolic cueing varied in the tested groups: musicians showed the smallest and older adults the largest interference effects. More importantly, a regression model, using processing speed and processing capacity as predictor variables, revealed a clear link between the available processing resources and the size of the interference effect during symbolic cueing. In the easier direct cueing task, no reliable interference was observed on a group level. We propose that the susceptibility to bimanual interference is modulated by the task-specific processing requirements in relation with the available processing resources of an individual.

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-018-1050-3

DO - 10.1007/s00426-018-1050-3

M3 - Article

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

ER -