Individual patient data meta-analysis

a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine

Kimiko A. Broeze, Brent C. Opmeer, Fulco van der Veen, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Ben W. J. Mol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Systematic reviews and accompanying meta-analyses are the cornerstones of evidence-based medicine. Systematic reviews summarize clinical evidence; meta-analyses provide summary estimates of the treatment effect or the diagnostic test accuracy. Although deemed to provide the highest level of evidence, their clinical value is limited as they can only summarize aggregated data. In these meta-analyses the true variability of the treatment effects cannot be explored to the desired extent, because the meta-analyses cannot distinguish between patients with different clinical profiles. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD), described as the ‘gold standard’ for systematic reviews are a promising approach that might overcome these limitations. IPD meta-analyses allow treatment effects and diagnostic accuracy to be estimated at the level of relevant patient subgroups. This enables researchers to investigate the effectiveness of treatment in patients with different profiles. In this article, we address the opportunities of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using IPD in reproductive medicine. We discuss its potential based on three clinical examples: single versus double embryo transfer in IVF, the diagnosis of tubal pathology and the prognostic value of ovarian reserve tests. We propose to show potential advantages of IPD systematic reviews and meta-analyses in providing stratified clinical evidence, which could improve medical care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)561-567
Number of pages7
JournalHuman Reproduction Update
Volume16
Issue number6
Early online date6 Sep 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Reproductive Medicine
Meta-Analysis
Evidence-Based Medicine
Embryo Transfer
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Therapeutics
Research Personnel
Pathology

Keywords

  • systematic review
  • individual patient data meta-analysis
  • embryo transfer
  • tubal pathology
  • ovarian reserve

Cite this

Individual patient data meta-analysis : a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine. / Broeze, Kimiko A.; Opmeer, Brent C.; van der Veen, Fulco; Bossuyt, Patrick M.; Bhattacharya, Siladitya; Mol, Ben W. J.

In: Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 16, No. 6, 11.2010, p. 561-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Broeze, Kimiko A. ; Opmeer, Brent C. ; van der Veen, Fulco ; Bossuyt, Patrick M. ; Bhattacharya, Siladitya ; Mol, Ben W. J. / Individual patient data meta-analysis : a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine. In: Human Reproduction Update. 2010 ; Vol. 16, No. 6. pp. 561-567.
@article{3f5d772443fa44eba324e55025b32ae3,
title = "Individual patient data meta-analysis: a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine",
abstract = "Systematic reviews and accompanying meta-analyses are the cornerstones of evidence-based medicine. Systematic reviews summarize clinical evidence; meta-analyses provide summary estimates of the treatment effect or the diagnostic test accuracy. Although deemed to provide the highest level of evidence, their clinical value is limited as they can only summarize aggregated data. In these meta-analyses the true variability of the treatment effects cannot be explored to the desired extent, because the meta-analyses cannot distinguish between patients with different clinical profiles. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD), described as the ‘gold standard’ for systematic reviews are a promising approach that might overcome these limitations. IPD meta-analyses allow treatment effects and diagnostic accuracy to be estimated at the level of relevant patient subgroups. This enables researchers to investigate the effectiveness of treatment in patients with different profiles. In this article, we address the opportunities of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using IPD in reproductive medicine. We discuss its potential based on three clinical examples: single versus double embryo transfer in IVF, the diagnosis of tubal pathology and the prognostic value of ovarian reserve tests. We propose to show potential advantages of IPD systematic reviews and meta-analyses in providing stratified clinical evidence, which could improve medical care.",
keywords = "systematic review, individual patient data meta-analysis, embryo transfer, tubal pathology, ovarian reserve",
author = "Broeze, {Kimiko A.} and Opmeer, {Brent C.} and {van der Veen}, Fulco and Bossuyt, {Patrick M.} and Siladitya Bhattacharya and Mol, {Ben W. J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1093/humupd/dmq043",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "561--567",
journal = "Human Reproduction Update",
issn = "1355-4786",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual patient data meta-analysis

T2 - a promising approach for evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine

AU - Broeze, Kimiko A.

AU - Opmeer, Brent C.

AU - van der Veen, Fulco

AU - Bossuyt, Patrick M.

AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya

AU - Mol, Ben W. J.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Systematic reviews and accompanying meta-analyses are the cornerstones of evidence-based medicine. Systematic reviews summarize clinical evidence; meta-analyses provide summary estimates of the treatment effect or the diagnostic test accuracy. Although deemed to provide the highest level of evidence, their clinical value is limited as they can only summarize aggregated data. In these meta-analyses the true variability of the treatment effects cannot be explored to the desired extent, because the meta-analyses cannot distinguish between patients with different clinical profiles. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD), described as the ‘gold standard’ for systematic reviews are a promising approach that might overcome these limitations. IPD meta-analyses allow treatment effects and diagnostic accuracy to be estimated at the level of relevant patient subgroups. This enables researchers to investigate the effectiveness of treatment in patients with different profiles. In this article, we address the opportunities of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using IPD in reproductive medicine. We discuss its potential based on three clinical examples: single versus double embryo transfer in IVF, the diagnosis of tubal pathology and the prognostic value of ovarian reserve tests. We propose to show potential advantages of IPD systematic reviews and meta-analyses in providing stratified clinical evidence, which could improve medical care.

AB - Systematic reviews and accompanying meta-analyses are the cornerstones of evidence-based medicine. Systematic reviews summarize clinical evidence; meta-analyses provide summary estimates of the treatment effect or the diagnostic test accuracy. Although deemed to provide the highest level of evidence, their clinical value is limited as they can only summarize aggregated data. In these meta-analyses the true variability of the treatment effects cannot be explored to the desired extent, because the meta-analyses cannot distinguish between patients with different clinical profiles. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual patient data (IPD), described as the ‘gold standard’ for systematic reviews are a promising approach that might overcome these limitations. IPD meta-analyses allow treatment effects and diagnostic accuracy to be estimated at the level of relevant patient subgroups. This enables researchers to investigate the effectiveness of treatment in patients with different profiles. In this article, we address the opportunities of systematic reviews and meta-analyses using IPD in reproductive medicine. We discuss its potential based on three clinical examples: single versus double embryo transfer in IVF, the diagnosis of tubal pathology and the prognostic value of ovarian reserve tests. We propose to show potential advantages of IPD systematic reviews and meta-analyses in providing stratified clinical evidence, which could improve medical care.

KW - systematic review

KW - individual patient data meta-analysis

KW - embryo transfer

KW - tubal pathology

KW - ovarian reserve

U2 - 10.1093/humupd/dmq043

DO - 10.1093/humupd/dmq043

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 561

EP - 567

JO - Human Reproduction Update

JF - Human Reproduction Update

SN - 1355-4786

IS - 6

ER -