Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank

A G Sutherland, A Raafat, P Yates, J D Hutchison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To assess the rate of infection associated with use of banked allograft bone, the case records of patients receiving banked bone over one year were reviewed. The notes of patients undergoing autografting procedures during the same period were reviewed as controls. Eighty-two patients received 98 banked allograft femoral heads and there were 10 proven infections (12.2%). Fifty-seven patients had autograft procedures, with two cases of infection (3.5%). The results of bacteriological surveillance of grafts harvested during the same period were analysed; there was a discard rate due to bacterial contamination of 1.3%, and two patients received three contaminated grafts, one of these patients suffering a postoperative infection. The failure rate of procedures was 50% where there was postoperative infection and 4.2% where there was none. Procedures using banked allograft bone have a substantial infection risk, and this is associated with a much higher rate of failure of the procedure. Prospective audit of allograft use should be applied to reduce this risk.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-22
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Hospital Infection
Volume35
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Bone Banks
Scotland
Allografts
Bone and Bones
Infection
Transplants
Autologous Transplantation
Autografts
Thigh

Keywords

  • Bone Banks
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Humans
  • Infection Control
  • Medical Audit
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Surgical Wound Infection
  • Tissue and Organ Procurement
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Treatment Failure

Cite this

Sutherland, A. G., Raafat, A., Yates, P., & Hutchison, J. D. (1997). Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank. Journal of Hospital Infection, 35(3), 215-22.

Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank. / Sutherland, A G; Raafat, A; Yates, P; Hutchison, J D.

In: Journal of Hospital Infection, Vol. 35, No. 3, 1997, p. 215-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sutherland, AG, Raafat, A, Yates, P & Hutchison, JD 1997, 'Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank', Journal of Hospital Infection, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 215-22.
Sutherland, A G ; Raafat, A ; Yates, P ; Hutchison, J D. / Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank. In: Journal of Hospital Infection. 1997 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 215-22.
@article{3c19684600654e1a8705e8938fc58da7,
title = "Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank",
abstract = "To assess the rate of infection associated with use of banked allograft bone, the case records of patients receiving banked bone over one year were reviewed. The notes of patients undergoing autografting procedures during the same period were reviewed as controls. Eighty-two patients received 98 banked allograft femoral heads and there were 10 proven infections (12.2{\%}). Fifty-seven patients had autograft procedures, with two cases of infection (3.5{\%}). The results of bacteriological surveillance of grafts harvested during the same period were analysed; there was a discard rate due to bacterial contamination of 1.3{\%}, and two patients received three contaminated grafts, one of these patients suffering a postoperative infection. The failure rate of procedures was 50{\%} where there was postoperative infection and 4.2{\%} where there was none. Procedures using banked allograft bone have a substantial infection risk, and this is associated with a much higher rate of failure of the procedure. Prospective audit of allograft use should be applied to reduce this risk.",
keywords = "Bone Banks, Bone Transplantation, Humans, Infection Control, Medical Audit, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Surgical Wound Infection, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Transplantation, Homologous, Treatment Failure",
author = "Sutherland, {A G} and A Raafat and P Yates and Hutchison, {J D}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "215--22",
journal = "Journal of Hospital Infection",
issn = "0195-6701",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the north east Scotland Bone Bank

AU - Sutherland, A G

AU - Raafat, A

AU - Yates, P

AU - Hutchison, J D

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - To assess the rate of infection associated with use of banked allograft bone, the case records of patients receiving banked bone over one year were reviewed. The notes of patients undergoing autografting procedures during the same period were reviewed as controls. Eighty-two patients received 98 banked allograft femoral heads and there were 10 proven infections (12.2%). Fifty-seven patients had autograft procedures, with two cases of infection (3.5%). The results of bacteriological surveillance of grafts harvested during the same period were analysed; there was a discard rate due to bacterial contamination of 1.3%, and two patients received three contaminated grafts, one of these patients suffering a postoperative infection. The failure rate of procedures was 50% where there was postoperative infection and 4.2% where there was none. Procedures using banked allograft bone have a substantial infection risk, and this is associated with a much higher rate of failure of the procedure. Prospective audit of allograft use should be applied to reduce this risk.

AB - To assess the rate of infection associated with use of banked allograft bone, the case records of patients receiving banked bone over one year were reviewed. The notes of patients undergoing autografting procedures during the same period were reviewed as controls. Eighty-two patients received 98 banked allograft femoral heads and there were 10 proven infections (12.2%). Fifty-seven patients had autograft procedures, with two cases of infection (3.5%). The results of bacteriological surveillance of grafts harvested during the same period were analysed; there was a discard rate due to bacterial contamination of 1.3%, and two patients received three contaminated grafts, one of these patients suffering a postoperative infection. The failure rate of procedures was 50% where there was postoperative infection and 4.2% where there was none. Procedures using banked allograft bone have a substantial infection risk, and this is associated with a much higher rate of failure of the procedure. Prospective audit of allograft use should be applied to reduce this risk.

KW - Bone Banks

KW - Bone Transplantation

KW - Humans

KW - Infection Control

KW - Medical Audit

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Surgical Wound Infection

KW - Tissue and Organ Procurement

KW - Transplantation, Homologous

KW - Treatment Failure

M3 - Article

C2 - 9093920

VL - 35

SP - 215

EP - 222

JO - Journal of Hospital Infection

JF - Journal of Hospital Infection

SN - 0195-6701

IS - 3

ER -