Inference for a binomial proportion in the presence of ties

Paul H. Garthwaite, John R. Crawford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We suppose a case is to be compared with controls on the basis of a test that gives a single discrete score. The score of the case may tie with the scores of one or more controls. However, scores relate to an underlying quantity of interest that is continuous and so an observed score can be treated as the rounded value of an underlying continuous score. This makes it reasonable to break ties. This paper addresses the problem of forming a confidence interval for the proportion of controls that have a lower underlying score than the case. In the absence of ties, this is the standard task of making inferences about a binomial proportion and many methods for forming confidence intervals have been proposed. We give a general procedure to extend these methods to handle ties, under the assumption that ties may be broken at random. Properties of the procedure are given and an example examines its performance when it is used to extend several methods. A real example shows that an estimated confidence interval can be much too small if the uncertainty associated with ties is not taken into account. Software implementing the procedure is freely available.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1915-1934
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Applied Statistics
Volume38
Issue number9
Early online date13 Dec 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • coverage
  • Clopper-Pearson interval
  • credible interval
  • discrete distribution
  • multiple ties
  • Wald interval

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inference for a binomial proportion in the presence of ties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this