Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review

E. Mitchell, S. Macdonald, N. C. Campbell, D. Weller, U. Macleod

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

145 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a major global health problem, with survival varying according to stage at diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can result from patient, practitioner or hospital delay. This paper reports the results of a review of the factors influencing pre-hospital delay - the time between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care or between first presentation and referral to secondary care. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Fifty-four studies were included. Patients' non-recognition of symptom seriousness increased delay, as did symptom denial. Patient delay was greater for rectal than colon cancers and the presence of more serious symptoms, such as pain, reduced delay. There appears to be no relationship between delay and patients' age, sex or socioeconomic status. Initial misdiagnosis, inadequate examination and inaccurate investigations increased practitioner delay. Use of referral guidelines may reduce delay, although evidence is currently limited. No intervention studies were identified. If delayed diagnosis is to be reduced, there must be increased recognition of the significance of symptoms among patients, and development and evaluation of interventions that are designed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and examination by practitioners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-70
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume98
Issue number1
Early online date4 Dec 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2008

Keywords

  • colorectal
  • delay
  • diagnosis
  • systematic review
  • general-practitioners
  • elderly patients
  • breast-cancer
  • patient delay
  • carcinoma
  • symptoms
  • rectum
  • care
  • guidelines
  • duration

Cite this

Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer : a systematic review. / Mitchell, E.; Macdonald, S.; Campbell, N. C.; Weller, D.; Macleod, U.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 98, No. 1, 08.01.2008, p. 60-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

Mitchell, E, Macdonald, S, Campbell, NC, Weller, D & Macleod, U 2008, 'Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review', British Journal of Cancer, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604096
Mitchell, E. ; Macdonald, S. ; Campbell, N. C. ; Weller, D. ; Macleod, U. / Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer : a systematic review. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2008 ; Vol. 98, No. 1. pp. 60-70.
@article{6451ae1f9b3b4b87ae6883cfee60c19a,
title = "Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review",
abstract = "Colorectal cancer is a major global health problem, with survival varying according to stage at diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can result from patient, practitioner or hospital delay. This paper reports the results of a review of the factors influencing pre-hospital delay - the time between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care or between first presentation and referral to secondary care. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Fifty-four studies were included. Patients' non-recognition of symptom seriousness increased delay, as did symptom denial. Patient delay was greater for rectal than colon cancers and the presence of more serious symptoms, such as pain, reduced delay. There appears to be no relationship between delay and patients' age, sex or socioeconomic status. Initial misdiagnosis, inadequate examination and inaccurate investigations increased practitioner delay. Use of referral guidelines may reduce delay, although evidence is currently limited. No intervention studies were identified. If delayed diagnosis is to be reduced, there must be increased recognition of the significance of symptoms among patients, and development and evaluation of interventions that are designed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and examination by practitioners.",
keywords = "colorectal, delay, diagnosis, systematic review, general-practitioners, elderly patients, breast-cancer, patient delay, carcinoma, symptoms, rectum, care, guidelines, duration",
author = "E. Mitchell and S. Macdonald and Campbell, {N. C.} and D. Weller and U. Macleod",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6604096",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "60--70",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Mitchell, E.

AU - Macdonald, S.

AU - Campbell, N. C.

AU - Weller, D.

AU - Macleod, U.

PY - 2008/1/8

Y1 - 2008/1/8

N2 - Colorectal cancer is a major global health problem, with survival varying according to stage at diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can result from patient, practitioner or hospital delay. This paper reports the results of a review of the factors influencing pre-hospital delay - the time between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care or between first presentation and referral to secondary care. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Fifty-four studies were included. Patients' non-recognition of symptom seriousness increased delay, as did symptom denial. Patient delay was greater for rectal than colon cancers and the presence of more serious symptoms, such as pain, reduced delay. There appears to be no relationship between delay and patients' age, sex or socioeconomic status. Initial misdiagnosis, inadequate examination and inaccurate investigations increased practitioner delay. Use of referral guidelines may reduce delay, although evidence is currently limited. No intervention studies were identified. If delayed diagnosis is to be reduced, there must be increased recognition of the significance of symptoms among patients, and development and evaluation of interventions that are designed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and examination by practitioners.

AB - Colorectal cancer is a major global health problem, with survival varying according to stage at diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis can result from patient, practitioner or hospital delay. This paper reports the results of a review of the factors influencing pre-hospital delay - the time between a patient first noticing a cancer symptom and presenting to primary care or between first presentation and referral to secondary care. A systematic methodology was applied, including extensive searches of the literature published from 1970 to 2003, systematic data extraction, quality assessment and narrative data synthesis. Fifty-four studies were included. Patients' non-recognition of symptom seriousness increased delay, as did symptom denial. Patient delay was greater for rectal than colon cancers and the presence of more serious symptoms, such as pain, reduced delay. There appears to be no relationship between delay and patients' age, sex or socioeconomic status. Initial misdiagnosis, inadequate examination and inaccurate investigations increased practitioner delay. Use of referral guidelines may reduce delay, although evidence is currently limited. No intervention studies were identified. If delayed diagnosis is to be reduced, there must be increased recognition of the significance of symptoms among patients, and development and evaluation of interventions that are designed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and examination by practitioners.

KW - colorectal

KW - delay

KW - diagnosis

KW - systematic review

KW - general-practitioners

KW - elderly patients

KW - breast-cancer

KW - patient delay

KW - carcinoma

KW - symptoms

KW - rectum

KW - care

KW - guidelines

KW - duration

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604096

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604096

M3 - Literature review

VL - 98

SP - 60

EP - 70

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 1

ER -