Informal economy, informal state: the case of Uzbekistan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract


Purpose – In the Soviet Union, the official command structure for economic production and distribution gave rise to, and depended upon, what has been described as a “shadow” economy. In the post-socialist context, the unregulated, often extra-legal activities of production and exchange, encompassing the survival strategies of the poor, the emergence of post-socialist “Mafias”, and much entrepreneurial activity, has been described using the concept of the “informal economy”.

Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on long-term participatory research over a period of three years.

Findings – The paper argues that what we might think of as informal economic activity in Uzbekistan cannot be understood in relation to a formal economy, but is rather an expression of a more general informalisation of lifeworlds following the end of the Soviet Union. Unlike the situation in the Soviet Union, the informal does not emerge from and exist in relation to formal political and economic structures. The state itself is experienced in personalised terms, as a “Mafia”, and the informal is all that there is.

Originality/value – This article provides an original perspective on the informal economy and informalised lifeworlds in Uzbekistan.


Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)681-696
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
Volume31
Issue number11/12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Uzbekistan
USSR
economy
shadow economy
survival strategy
political structure
organized crime
economic structure
economics
methodology
Informal economy
Soviet Union
Values
Life world

Keywords

  • Central Asia
  • corruption
  • economic conditions
  • informal economy
  • national economy
  • Soviet Union
  • state
  • Uzbekistan

Cite this

Informal economy, informal state : the case of Uzbekistan. / Rasanayagam, Johan.

In: International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 31, No. 11/12, 2011, p. 681-696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{327c52adb1af41e78b5ad6810d4123fc,
title = "Informal economy, informal state: the case of Uzbekistan",
abstract = "Purpose – In the Soviet Union, the official command structure for economic production and distribution gave rise to, and depended upon, what has been described as a “shadow” economy. In the post-socialist context, the unregulated, often extra-legal activities of production and exchange, encompassing the survival strategies of the poor, the emergence of post-socialist “Mafias”, and much entrepreneurial activity, has been described using the concept of the “informal economy”. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on long-term participatory research over a period of three years. Findings – The paper argues that what we might think of as informal economic activity in Uzbekistan cannot be understood in relation to a formal economy, but is rather an expression of a more general informalisation of lifeworlds following the end of the Soviet Union. Unlike the situation in the Soviet Union, the informal does not emerge from and exist in relation to formal political and economic structures. The state itself is experienced in personalised terms, as a “Mafia”, and the informal is all that there is. Originality/value – This article provides an original perspective on the informal economy and informalised lifeworlds in Uzbekistan.",
keywords = "Central Asia, corruption, economic conditions, informal economy, national economy, Soviet Union, state, Uzbekistan",
author = "Johan Rasanayagam",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1108/01443331111177878",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "681--696",
journal = "International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy",
issn = "0144-333X",
publisher = "Barmarick Publications",
number = "11/12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informal economy, informal state

T2 - the case of Uzbekistan

AU - Rasanayagam, Johan

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose – In the Soviet Union, the official command structure for economic production and distribution gave rise to, and depended upon, what has been described as a “shadow” economy. In the post-socialist context, the unregulated, often extra-legal activities of production and exchange, encompassing the survival strategies of the poor, the emergence of post-socialist “Mafias”, and much entrepreneurial activity, has been described using the concept of the “informal economy”. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on long-term participatory research over a period of three years. Findings – The paper argues that what we might think of as informal economic activity in Uzbekistan cannot be understood in relation to a formal economy, but is rather an expression of a more general informalisation of lifeworlds following the end of the Soviet Union. Unlike the situation in the Soviet Union, the informal does not emerge from and exist in relation to formal political and economic structures. The state itself is experienced in personalised terms, as a “Mafia”, and the informal is all that there is. Originality/value – This article provides an original perspective on the informal economy and informalised lifeworlds in Uzbekistan.

AB - Purpose – In the Soviet Union, the official command structure for economic production and distribution gave rise to, and depended upon, what has been described as a “shadow” economy. In the post-socialist context, the unregulated, often extra-legal activities of production and exchange, encompassing the survival strategies of the poor, the emergence of post-socialist “Mafias”, and much entrepreneurial activity, has been described using the concept of the “informal economy”. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is based on long-term participatory research over a period of three years. Findings – The paper argues that what we might think of as informal economic activity in Uzbekistan cannot be understood in relation to a formal economy, but is rather an expression of a more general informalisation of lifeworlds following the end of the Soviet Union. Unlike the situation in the Soviet Union, the informal does not emerge from and exist in relation to formal political and economic structures. The state itself is experienced in personalised terms, as a “Mafia”, and the informal is all that there is. Originality/value – This article provides an original perspective on the informal economy and informalised lifeworlds in Uzbekistan.

KW - Central Asia

KW - corruption

KW - economic conditions

KW - informal economy

KW - national economy

KW - Soviet Union

KW - state

KW - Uzbekistan

U2 - 10.1108/01443331111177878

DO - 10.1108/01443331111177878

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 681

EP - 696

JO - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

JF - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

SN - 0144-333X

IS - 11/12

ER -