Information Asymmetries in Private Equity: Reporting Frequency, Endowments, and Governance

Sofia Johan* (Corresponding Author), Minjie Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using PitchBook’s private equity (PE) database of 4548 PE funds from 42 countries for the 2000 to 2012 period, we find that higher reporting frequency is associated with lower information asymmetry in performance reports from general partners (GPs) to limited partners. We also find that endowments are systematically associated with less reported unrealized returns as a percentage of total returns generated from GPs. Moreover, endowments receive more performance reports from their PE funds, implying more stringent governance. These findings persist after controlling for various institutional and GP characteristics and are robust to several adjustments for endogeneity concerns. This study also contributes to the finance, accounting, and business ethics literature on financial reporting quality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199–220
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume174
Early online date27 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
Sofia Johan is at the College of Business, Florida Atlantic University and Minjie Zhang is at the Odette School of Business, University of Windsor. The authors thank Omrane Guedhami, Douglas Cumming, Michael Ewens, Zhenyu Wu, Andrej Gill, Iness Aguir, Marcel Grupp, Kevin Young and Oleg Gredil for their very helpful comments.

Funding
Sofia Johan thanks the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and Phil Smith Center for Free Enterprise for financial support.

Keywords

  • private equity
  • endowments
  • financial reporting
  • law and governance
  • culture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Information Asymmetries in Private Equity: Reporting Frequency, Endowments, and Governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this