Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning

Martin Kollingbaum, Timothy J. Norman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A norm-governed agent takes social norms into account in its practical reasoning. Such norms characterise its role within a specific organisational context. By adopting a role, the agent commits to fulfil and adhere to the social norms associated with that role. These commitments require the agent to act in a way that does not violate any of its prohibitions or obligations. In adopting different sets of norms, an agent may experience conflicts between these norms as well as inconsistencies between possible actions for fulfilling its obligations and its currently adopted set of norms. In order to resolve such problems, it must be informed about conflicts and inconsistencies. The NoA architecture for norm-governed agents implements a computationally efficient mechanism for identifying and indicating such problems - possible candidates for action are assigned a specific label that contains cross-referenced information of actions and norms. As actions are indicated as problematic and not simply filtered out, the agent can still choose to either act according to its norms or against them. The labelling mechanism presented in this paper is therefore a critical step towards enabling an agent to reason about norm violations - the agent becomes norm-autonomous.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCoordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems
Subtitle of host publicationAAMAS 2005 International Workshops on Agents, Norms and Institutions for Regulated Multi-Agent Systems, ANIREM 2005, and Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems, OOOP 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-26, 2005, Revised Selected Papers
EditorsOlivier Boissier, Julian A. Padget, Virginia Dignum, Gabriela Lindemann, Eric T. Matson, Sascha Ossowski, Jaime Simao Sichman, Javier Vazquez-Salceda
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Pages183-197
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-540-35176-4
ISBN (Print)978-3-540-35173-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science
PublisherSpringer-Verlag
Volume3913
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Cite this

Kollingbaum, M., & Norman, T. J. (2006). Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning. In O. Boissier, J. A. Padget, V. Dignum, G. Lindemann, E. T. Matson, S. Ossowski, J. S. Sichman, ... J. Vazquez-Salceda (Eds.), Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems: AAMAS 2005 International Workshops on Agents, Norms and Institutions for Regulated Multi-Agent Systems, ANIREM 2005, and Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems, OOOP 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-26, 2005, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 183-197). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 3913). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_13

Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning. / Kollingbaum, Martin; Norman, Timothy J.

Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems: AAMAS 2005 International Workshops on Agents, Norms and Institutions for Regulated Multi-Agent Systems, ANIREM 2005, and Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems, OOOP 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-26, 2005, Revised Selected Papers. ed. / Olivier Boissier; Julian A. Padget; Virginia Dignum; Gabriela Lindemann; Eric T. Matson; Sascha Ossowski; Jaime Simao Sichman; Javier Vazquez-Salceda. Springer-Verlag, 2006. p. 183-197 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 3913).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Kollingbaum, M & Norman, TJ 2006, Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning. in O Boissier, JA Padget, V Dignum, G Lindemann, ET Matson, S Ossowski, JS Sichman & J Vazquez-Salceda (eds), Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems: AAMAS 2005 International Workshops on Agents, Norms and Institutions for Regulated Multi-Agent Systems, ANIREM 2005, and Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems, OOOP 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-26, 2005, Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3913, Springer-Verlag, pp. 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_13
Kollingbaum M, Norman TJ. Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning. In Boissier O, Padget JA, Dignum V, Lindemann G, Matson ET, Ossowski S, Sichman JS, Vazquez-Salceda J, editors, Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems: AAMAS 2005 International Workshops on Agents, Norms and Institutions for Regulated Multi-Agent Systems, ANIREM 2005, and Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems, OOOP 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-26, 2005, Revised Selected Papers. Springer-Verlag. 2006. p. 183-197. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/11775331_13
Kollingbaum, Martin ; Norman, Timothy J. / Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning. Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems: AAMAS 2005 International Workshops on Agents, Norms and Institutions for Regulated Multi-Agent Systems, ANIREM 2005, and Organizations in Multi-Agent Systems, OOOP 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands, July 25-26, 2005, Revised Selected Papers. editor / Olivier Boissier ; Julian A. Padget ; Virginia Dignum ; Gabriela Lindemann ; Eric T. Matson ; Sascha Ossowski ; Jaime Simao Sichman ; Javier Vazquez-Salceda. Springer-Verlag, 2006. pp. 183-197 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science).
@inbook{6cbd576150a946a9a8004d094beeecdb,
title = "Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning",
abstract = "A norm-governed agent takes social norms into account in its practical reasoning. Such norms characterise its role within a specific organisational context. By adopting a role, the agent commits to fulfil and adhere to the social norms associated with that role. These commitments require the agent to act in a way that does not violate any of its prohibitions or obligations. In adopting different sets of norms, an agent may experience conflicts between these norms as well as inconsistencies between possible actions for fulfilling its obligations and its currently adopted set of norms. In order to resolve such problems, it must be informed about conflicts and inconsistencies. The NoA architecture for norm-governed agents implements a computationally efficient mechanism for identifying and indicating such problems - possible candidates for action are assigned a specific label that contains cross-referenced information of actions and norms. As actions are indicated as problematic and not simply filtered out, the agent can still choose to either act according to its norms or against them. The labelling mechanism presented in this paper is therefore a critical step towards enabling an agent to reason about norm violations - the agent becomes norm-autonomous.",
author = "Martin Kollingbaum and Norman, {Timothy J.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1007/11775331_13",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-540-35173-3",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
pages = "183--197",
editor = "Olivier Boissier and Padget, {Julian A.} and Virginia Dignum and Gabriela Lindemann and Matson, {Eric T.} and Sascha Ossowski and Sichman, {Jaime Simao} and Javier Vazquez-Salceda",
booktitle = "Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Informed deliberation during norm-governed practical reasoning

AU - Kollingbaum, Martin

AU - Norman, Timothy J.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - A norm-governed agent takes social norms into account in its practical reasoning. Such norms characterise its role within a specific organisational context. By adopting a role, the agent commits to fulfil and adhere to the social norms associated with that role. These commitments require the agent to act in a way that does not violate any of its prohibitions or obligations. In adopting different sets of norms, an agent may experience conflicts between these norms as well as inconsistencies between possible actions for fulfilling its obligations and its currently adopted set of norms. In order to resolve such problems, it must be informed about conflicts and inconsistencies. The NoA architecture for norm-governed agents implements a computationally efficient mechanism for identifying and indicating such problems - possible candidates for action are assigned a specific label that contains cross-referenced information of actions and norms. As actions are indicated as problematic and not simply filtered out, the agent can still choose to either act according to its norms or against them. The labelling mechanism presented in this paper is therefore a critical step towards enabling an agent to reason about norm violations - the agent becomes norm-autonomous.

AB - A norm-governed agent takes social norms into account in its practical reasoning. Such norms characterise its role within a specific organisational context. By adopting a role, the agent commits to fulfil and adhere to the social norms associated with that role. These commitments require the agent to act in a way that does not violate any of its prohibitions or obligations. In adopting different sets of norms, an agent may experience conflicts between these norms as well as inconsistencies between possible actions for fulfilling its obligations and its currently adopted set of norms. In order to resolve such problems, it must be informed about conflicts and inconsistencies. The NoA architecture for norm-governed agents implements a computationally efficient mechanism for identifying and indicating such problems - possible candidates for action are assigned a specific label that contains cross-referenced information of actions and norms. As actions are indicated as problematic and not simply filtered out, the agent can still choose to either act according to its norms or against them. The labelling mechanism presented in this paper is therefore a critical step towards enabling an agent to reason about norm violations - the agent becomes norm-autonomous.

U2 - 10.1007/11775331_13

DO - 10.1007/11775331_13

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-540-35173-3

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science

SP - 183

EP - 197

BT - Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems

A2 - Boissier, Olivier

A2 - Padget, Julian A.

A2 - Dignum, Virginia

A2 - Lindemann, Gabriela

A2 - Matson, Eric T.

A2 - Ossowski, Sascha

A2 - Sichman, Jaime Simao

A2 - Vazquez-Salceda, Javier

PB - Springer-Verlag

ER -