Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity

Clive Laurenece Spash

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    64 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The level and depth of information provision required for making informed judgements over environmental options has remained troublesome in various contexts from individual choice through to international policy. In the valuation literature concern has been expressed for 'information bias' leading to distorted estimates of the worth of environmental entities (e.g. wildlife, ecosystems) because peoples intentions are formed during the valuation process by the information provided. Contending psychological models on the role of information and its relationship to ethical concerns are reviewed with respect to public decision processes over environmental entities. The robustness of pre-existing environmental preferences is then linked to ethical positions but their role is unclear. Empirical evidence is reported from a contingent valuation method study of coral reef biodiversity on the strong connections between informing and forming preferences and specific ethical beliefs regarding environmental entities. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)665-687
    Number of pages23
    JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
    Volume23
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • information bias
    • contingent valuation
    • environmental ethics
    • values
    • rights based beliefs
    • coral reef biodiversity
    • WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY
    • CONTINGENT-VALUATION
    • PUBLIC-GOODS
    • PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
    • ECONOMIC VALUATION
    • ETHICS

    Cite this

    Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity. / Spash, Clive Laurenece.

    In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2002, p. 665-687.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{cc06f12e966d484eb45c9a68ff36fa5b,
    title = "Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity",
    abstract = "The level and depth of information provision required for making informed judgements over environmental options has remained troublesome in various contexts from individual choice through to international policy. In the valuation literature concern has been expressed for 'information bias' leading to distorted estimates of the worth of environmental entities (e.g. wildlife, ecosystems) because peoples intentions are formed during the valuation process by the information provided. Contending psychological models on the role of information and its relationship to ethical concerns are reviewed with respect to public decision processes over environmental entities. The robustness of pre-existing environmental preferences is then linked to ethical positions but their role is unclear. Empirical evidence is reported from a contingent valuation method study of coral reef biodiversity on the strong connections between informing and forming preferences and specific ethical beliefs regarding environmental entities. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.",
    keywords = "information bias, contingent valuation, environmental ethics, values, rights based beliefs, coral reef biodiversity, WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY, CONTINGENT-VALUATION, PUBLIC-GOODS, PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE, ECONOMIC VALUATION, ETHICS",
    author = "Spash, {Clive Laurenece}",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00123-X",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "665--687",
    journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
    issn = "0167-4870",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity

    AU - Spash, Clive Laurenece

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - The level and depth of information provision required for making informed judgements over environmental options has remained troublesome in various contexts from individual choice through to international policy. In the valuation literature concern has been expressed for 'information bias' leading to distorted estimates of the worth of environmental entities (e.g. wildlife, ecosystems) because peoples intentions are formed during the valuation process by the information provided. Contending psychological models on the role of information and its relationship to ethical concerns are reviewed with respect to public decision processes over environmental entities. The robustness of pre-existing environmental preferences is then linked to ethical positions but their role is unclear. Empirical evidence is reported from a contingent valuation method study of coral reef biodiversity on the strong connections between informing and forming preferences and specific ethical beliefs regarding environmental entities. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

    AB - The level and depth of information provision required for making informed judgements over environmental options has remained troublesome in various contexts from individual choice through to international policy. In the valuation literature concern has been expressed for 'information bias' leading to distorted estimates of the worth of environmental entities (e.g. wildlife, ecosystems) because peoples intentions are formed during the valuation process by the information provided. Contending psychological models on the role of information and its relationship to ethical concerns are reviewed with respect to public decision processes over environmental entities. The robustness of pre-existing environmental preferences is then linked to ethical positions but their role is unclear. Empirical evidence is reported from a contingent valuation method study of coral reef biodiversity on the strong connections between informing and forming preferences and specific ethical beliefs regarding environmental entities. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

    KW - information bias

    KW - contingent valuation

    KW - environmental ethics

    KW - values

    KW - rights based beliefs

    KW - coral reef biodiversity

    KW - WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY

    KW - CONTINGENT-VALUATION

    KW - PUBLIC-GOODS

    KW - PSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

    KW - ECONOMIC VALUATION

    KW - ETHICS

    U2 - 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00123-X

    DO - 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00123-X

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 665

    EP - 687

    JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

    JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

    SN - 0167-4870

    IS - 5

    ER -